DBMS > ClickHouse vs. jBASE vs. ScyllaDB vs. Tarantool vs. ToroDB

Vergleich der Systemeigenschaften ClickHouse vs. jBASE vs. ScyllaDB vs. Tarantool vs. ToroDB

Redaktionelle Informationen bereitgestellt von DB-Engines

Name

ToroDB seems to be discontinued. Therefore it is excluded from the DB-Engines Ranking.

Kurzbeschreibung

A high-performance, column-oriented SQL DBMS for online analytical processing (OLAP) that uses all available system resources to their full potential to process each analytical query as fast as possible. It is available as both an open-source software and a cloud offering.

A robust multi-value DBMS comprising development tools and middleware

Cassandra and DynamoDB compatible wide column store

In-memory computing platform with a flexible data schema for efficiently building high-performance applications

A MongoDB-compatible JSON document store, built on top of PostgreSQL

Primäres Datenbankmodell

Relational DBMS

Multivalue DBMS

Wide Column Store

Document Store
Key-Value Store
Relational DBMS

Document Store

Sekundäre Datenbankmodelle

Time Series DBMS

Key-Value Store

Spatial DBMS

with Tarantool/GIS extension

DB-Engines Ranking misst die Popularität von Datenbankmanagement- systemen
Trend Chart

Punkte	16,34
Rang	#38	Overall
	#23	Relational DBMS

Punkte	1,41
Rang	#159	Overall
	#3	Multivalue DBMS

Punkte	4,75
Rang	#68	Overall
	#5	Wide Column Stores

Punkte	1,72
Rang	#144	Overall
	#25	Document Stores
	#25	Key-Value Stores
	#66	Relational DBMS

Website

clickhouse.com

www.rocketsoftware.com/products/rocket-multivalue-application-development-platform/rocket-jbase

www.scylladb.com

www.tarantool.io

github.com/torodb/server

Technische Dokumentation

clickhouse.com/docs

docs.rocketsoftware.com/bundle?labelkey=jbase_5.9

docs.scylladb.com

www.tarantool.io/en/doc

Entwickler

Clickhouse Inc.

Rocket Software (früher Zumasys)

ScyllaDB

8Kdata

Erscheinungsjahr

2016

1991

2015

2008

2016

Aktuelle Version

v24.4.1.2088-stable, Mai 2024

5.7

ScyllaDB Open Source 5.4.1, Jaenner 2024

2.10.0, Mai 2022

Lizenz

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

Apache 2.0

kommerziell

Open Source

Open Source (AGPL), commercial license available

Open Source

BSD-2, source-available extensions (modules), commercial licenses for Tarantool Enterprise

Open Source

AGPL-V3

Ausschließlich ein Cloud-Service

Nur als Cloud-Service verfügbar

nein

DBaaS Angebote (gesponserte Links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

DoubleCloud: Fully managed ClickHouse alongside best-in-class managed open-source services to build analytics at scale.
ClickHouse Cloud: Get the performance you love from open source ClickHouse in a serverless offering that takes care of the details so you can spend more time getting insight out of the fastest database on earth.
Aiven for Clickhouse: Managed cloud data warehousing with high-speed analytics.

Scylla Cloud: Create real-time applications that run at global scale with Scylla Cloud, the industry’s most powerful NoSQL DBaaS

Implementierungssprache

C++

C und C++

Java

Server Betriebssysteme

FreeBSD
Linux
macOS

AIX
Linux
Windows

Linux

BSD
Linux
macOS

Alle Betriebssysteme mit einer Java 7 VM

Datenschema

schemafrei

Flexible data schema: relational definition for tables with ability to store json-like documents in columns

schemafrei

Typisierung

vordefinierte Datentypen, z.B. float oder date

optional

string, double, decimal, uuid, integer, blob, boolean, datetime

string, integer, double, boolean, date, object_id

XML Unterstützung

Verarbeitung von Daten in XML Format, beispielsweise Speicherung von XML-Strukturen und/oder Unterstützung von XPath, XQuery, XSLT

nein

Sekundärindizes

yes

cluster global secondary indices

SQL

Support of SQL

Close to ANSI SQL (SQL/JSON + extensions)

Embedded SQL for jBASE in BASIC

SQL-like DML and DDL statements (CQL)

Full-featured ANSI SQL support

APIs und andere Zugriffskonzepte

gRPC
HTTP REST
JDBC
MySQL wire protocol
ODBC
PostgreSQL wire protocol
Proprietäres Protokoll

JDBC
ODBC
Propriätäres Protokoll
RESTful HTTP API
SOAP-basiertes API

Proprietäres Protokoll

compatible with CQL (Cassandra Query Language, an SQL-like language)
RESTful HTTP API (DynamoDB compatible)
Thrift

Open binary protocol

Unterstützte Programmiersprachen

3rd party library
C++
Elixir

3rd party library
Go

3rd party library
Java

3rd party library
JavaScript (Node.js)

3rd party library
Kotlin

3rd party library
Nim

3rd party library
Perl

3rd party library
PHP

3rd party library
Python

3rd party library
R

3rd party library
Ruby

3rd party library
Rust
Scala

3rd party library

.Net
Basic
Jabbascript
Java

For CQL interface: C#, C++, Clojure, Erlang, Go, Haskell, Java, JavaScript, Node.js, Perl, PHP, Python, Ruby, Rust, Scala
For DynamoDB interface: .Net, ColdFusion, Erlang, Groovy, Java, JavaScript, Perl, PHP, Python, Ruby

C
C#
C++
Erlang
Go
Java
JavaScript
Lua
Perl
PHP
Python
Rust

Server-seitige Scripts

Stored Procedures

yes, Lua

Lua, C and SQL stored procedures

Triggers

nein

Partitionierungsmechanismen

Methoden zum Speichern von unterschiedlichen Daten auf unterschiedlichen Knoten

key based and custom

Sharding

Sharding, partitioned with virtual buckets by user defined affinity key. Live resharding for scale up and scale down without maintenance downtime.

Sharding

Replikationsmechanismen

Methoden zum redundanten Speichern von Daten auf mehreren Knoten

Asynchronous and synchronous physical replication; geographically distributed replicas; support for object storages.

frei wählbarer Replikationsfaktor

Representation of geographical distribution of servers is possible

Asynchronous replication with multi-master option
Configurable replication topology (full-mesh, chain, star)
Synchronous quorum replication (with Raft)

Source-Replica Replikation

MapReduce

Bietet ein API für Map/Reduce Operationen

nein

Konsistenzkonzept

Methoden zur Sicherstellung der Konsistenz in einem verteilten System

Immediate Consistency

Eventual Consistency
Tunable Consistency

can be individually decided for each write operation

Casual consistency across sharding partitions
Eventual consistency within replicaset partition

when using asyncronous replication
Immediate Consistency within single instance
Sequential consistency including linearizable read within replicaset partition

when using Raft

Eventual Consistency
Immediate Consistency

Fremdschlüssel

referenzielle Integrität

nein

yes

nein

Transaktionskonzept

Unterstützung zur Sicherstellung der Datenintegrität bei nicht-atomaren Datenmanipulationen

nein

ACID

nein

Atomicity and isolation are supported for single operations

ACID, with serializable isolation and linearizable read (within partition); Configurable MVCC (within partition); No cross-shard distributed transactions

nein

Concurrency

Unterstützung von gleichzeitig ausgeführten Datenmanipulationen

Durability

Dauerhafte Speicherung der Daten

yes, write ahead logging

In-Memory Unterstützung

Gibt es Möglichkeiten einige oder alle Strukturen nur im Hauptspeicher zu halten

in-memory tables

yes, full featured in-memory storage engine with persistence

Berechtigungskonzept

Zugriffskontrolle

Access rights for users and roles. Column and row based policies. Quotas and resource limits. Pluggable authentication with LDAP and Kerberos. Password based, X.509 certificate, and SSH key authentication.

Access rights can be defined down to the item level

Access rights for users can be defined per object

Access Control Lists
Mutual TLS authentication for Tarantol Enterprise
Password based authentication
Role-based access control (RBAC) and LDAP for Tarantol Enterprise
Users and Roles

Zugriffsrechte für Benutzer und Rollen

Weitere Informationen bereitgestellt vom Systemhersteller

Specific characteristics

ScyllaDB is engineered to deliver predictable performance at scale. It’s adopted...
» mehr

Competitive advantages

Highly-performant (efficiently utilizes full resources of a node and network; millions...
» mehr

Typical application scenarios

ScyllaDB is ideal for applications that require high throughput and low latency at...
» mehr

Key customers

Discord, Epic Games, Expedia, Zillow, Comcast, Disney+ Hotstar, Samsung, ShareChat,...
» mehr

Market metrics

ScyllaDB typically offers ~75% total cost of ownership savings, with ~5X higher throughput...
» mehr

Licensing and pricing models

ScyllaDB Open Source - free open source software (AGPL) ScyllaDB Enterprise - subscription-based...
» mehr

Wir laden Vertreter der Systemhersteller ein uns zu kontaktieren, um die Systeminformationen zu aktualisieren und zu ergänzen,
sowie um Herstellerinformationen wie Schlüsselkunden, Vorteile gegenüber Konkurrenten und Marktmetriken anzuzeigen.

Zugehörige Produkte und Dienstleistungen

Drittanbieter

Aiven for Clickhouse: Managed cloud data warehousing with high-speed analytics.
» mehr

DoubleCloud: Fully managed ClickHouse alongside best-in-class managed open-source services to build analytics at scale.
» mehr

Wir laden Vertreter von Anbietern von zugehörigen Produkten ein uns zu kontaktieren, um hier Informationen über ihre Angebote zu präsentieren.

Weitere Ressourcen

DB-Engines Blog Posts

Data processing speed and reliability: in-memory synchronous replication
9. November 2021, Vladimir Perepelytsya, Tarantool (sponsor)

alle anzeigen

Erwähnungen in aktuellen Nachrichten

Ubuntu 24.04 + Linux 6.9 Intel & AMD Server Performance
23. Mai 2024, Phoronix

Why Clickhouse Should Be Your Next Database
6. Juli 2023, The New Stack

ClickHouse Cloud & Amazon S3 Express One Zone: Making a blazing fast analytical database even faster | Amazon ...
28. November 2023, AWS Blog

ClickHouse Announces Launch of ClickPipes
26. September 2023, Datanami

From Open Source to SaaS: the Journey of ClickHouse
16. Januar 2024, InfoQ.com

bereitgestellt von Google News

Temenos signs first customer in India
24. August 2009, Finextra

bereitgestellt von Google News

Sleeping at Scale - Delivering 10k Timers per Second per Node with Rust, Tokio, Kafka, and Scylla
26. April 2024, InfoQ.com

ScyllaDB on AWS is a NoSQL Database Built for Gigabyte-to-Petabyte Scale | Amazon Web Services
6. Januar 2023, AWS Blog

Scylla Eyes Cassandra's NoSQL Workloads
13. Februar 2018, Datanami

ScyllaDB Database Review | eWeek
21. August 2018, eWeek

ScyllaDB Launches Scylla Cloud Database as a Service
14. April 2019, insideBIGDATA

bereitgestellt von Google News

Deploying Tarantool Cartridge applications with zero effort (Part 1)
16. Dezember 2019, Хабр

Тarantool Cartridge: Sharding Lua Backend in Three Lines
9. Oktober 2019, Хабр

VShard — horizontal scaling in Tarantool
7. März 2019, Хабр

Accelerating PHP connectors for Tarantool using Async, Swoole, and Parallel
18. Dezember 2019, Хабр

bereitgestellt von Google News

Teilen sie diese Seite mit ihrem Netzwerk