DBMS > Microsoft Azure Data Explorer vs. MySQL vs. Oracle vs. PostgreSQL vs. RRDtool
Vergleich der Systemeigenschaften Microsoft Azure Data Explorer vs. MySQL vs. Oracle vs. PostgreSQL vs. RRDtool
| Redaktionelle Informationen bereitgestellt von DB-Engines | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Name | Microsoft Azure Data Explorer Xaus Vergleich ausschliessen | MySQL Xaus Vergleich ausschliessen | Oracle Xaus Vergleich ausschliessen | PostgreSQL Xaus Vergleich ausschliessen | RRDtool Xaus Vergleich ausschliessen | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kurzbeschreibung | Fully managed big data interactive analytics platform | Weit verbreitetes, allgemein einsetzbares Open Source RDBMS | Weit verbreitetes, allgemein einsetzbares RDBMS | Weit verbreitetes, allgemein einsetzbares Open Source RDBMS  Entwickelt als objektorientiertes DBMS, im Laufe der Zeit um 'Standards' wie SQL erweitert | Industry standard data logging and graphing tool for time series data. RRD is an acronym for round-robin database. The data is stored in a circular buffer, thus the system storage footprint remains constant over time. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primäres Datenbankmodell | Relational DBMS column oriented | Relational DBMS Key/Value Zugriff über memcached API | Relational DBMS | Relational DBMS mit objektorientierten Erweiterungen, z.B.: benutzerdefinierte Datentypen/Funktionen und Vererbung. Key/Value handling mit hstore Modul. | Time Series DBMS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sekundäre Datenbankmodelle | Document Store If a column is of type dynamic docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/kusto/query/scalar-data-types/dynamic then it's possible to add arbitrary JSON documents in this cell Event Store this is the general usage pattern at Microsoft. Billing, Logs, Telemetry events are stored in ADX and the state of an individual entity is defined by the arg_max(timestamps)Spatial DBMS Suchmaschine support for complex search expressions docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/kusto/query/parseoperator FTS, Geospatial docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/kusto/query/geo-point-to-geohash-function distributed search -> ADX acts as a distributed search engineTime Series DBMS see docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/data-explorer/time-series-analysis | Document Store Spatial DBMS | Document Store Graph DBMS with Oracle Spatial and GraphRDF Store with Oracle Spatial and GraphSpatial DBMS with Oracle Spatial and GraphVektor DBMS since Oracle 23 | Document Store Graph DBMS with Apache AgeSpatial DBMS Vektor DBMS with pgvector extension | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Website | azure.microsoft.com/services/data-explorer | www.mysql.com | www.oracle.com/database | www.postgresql.org | oss.oetiker.ch/rrdtool | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Technische Dokumentation | docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/data-explorer | dev.mysql.com/doc | docs.oracle.com/en/database | www.postgresql.org/docs | oss.oetiker.ch/rrdtool/doc | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Entwickler | Microsoft | Oracle seit 2010, ursprünglich MySQL AB, danach Sun | Oracle | PostgreSQL Global Development Group www.postgresql.org/developer | Tobias Oetiker | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Erscheinungsjahr | 2019 | 1995 | 1980 | 1989 1989: Postgres, 1996: PostgreSQL | 1999 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Aktuelle Version | cloud service with continuous releases | 8.4.0, April 2024 | 23c, September 2023 | 16.3, Mai 2024 | 1.8.0, 2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lizenz Commercial or Open Source | kommerziell | Open Source GPL Version 2. Kommerzielle Lizenzen mit erweiterter Funktionalität sind verfügbar. | kommerziell eingeschränkte kostenlose Version verfügbar | Open Source BSD | Open Source GPL V2 and FLOSS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ausschließlich ein Cloud-Service Nur als Cloud-Service verfügbar | ja | nein | nein | nein | nein | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| DBaaS Angebote (gesponserte Links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed. | Aiven for MySQL: Fully managed MySQL, deployable in the cloud of your choice, with seamless integrations and lightning-fast setup. |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Implementierungssprache | C und C++ | C und C++ | C | C Implementations in Java (e.g. RRD4J) and C# available | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Server Betriebssysteme | gehostet | FreeBSD Linux OS X Solaris Windows | AIX HP-UX Linux OS X Solaris Windows z/OS | FreeBSD HP-UX Linux NetBSD OpenBSD OS X Solaris Unix Windows | HP-UX Linux | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Datenschema | Fixed schema with schema-less datatypes (dynamic) | ja | ja Schemaless in JSON and XML columns | ja | ja | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Typisierung vordefinierte Datentypen, z.B. float oder date | ja bool, datetime, dynamic, guid, int, long, real, string, timespan, double: docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/kusto/query/scalar-data-types | ja | ja | ja | Numeric data only | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| XML Unterstützung Verarbeitung von Daten in XML Format, beispielsweise Speicherung von XML-Strukturen und/oder Unterstützung von XPath, XQuery, XSLT | ja | ja | ja | ja specific XML-type available, but no XML query functionality. | nein Exporting into and restoring from XML files possible | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sekundärindizes | all fields are automatically indexed | ja | ja | ja | nein | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SQL Support of SQL | Kusto Query Language (KQL), SQL subset | ja mit proprietären Erweiterungen | ja mit proprietären Erweiterungen | ja Standard mit zahlreichen Erweiterungen | nein | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| APIs und andere Zugriffskonzepte | Microsoft SQL Server communication protocol (MS-TDS) RESTful HTTP API | ADO.NET JDBC ODBC Proprietäres native API | JDBC ODBC ODP.NET Oracle Call Interface (OCI) | ADO.NET JDBC native C library ODBC streaming API for large objects | In-process Library Pipes | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Unterstützte Programmiersprachen | .Net Go Java JavaScript (Node.js) PowerShell Python R | Ada C C# C++ D Delphi Eiffel Erlang Haskell Java JavaScript (Node.js) Objective-C OCaml Perl PHP Python Ruby Scheme Tcl | C C# C++ Clojure Cobol Delphi Eiffel Erlang Fortran Groovy Haskell Java JavaScript Lisp Objective C OCaml Perl PHP Python R Ruby Scala Tcl Visual Basic | .Net C C++ Delphi Java JDBCJavaScript (Node.js) Perl PHP Python Tcl | C with librrd library C# with a different implementation of RRDToolJava with a different implementation of RRDToolJavaScript (Node.js) with a different implementation of RRDToolLua Perl PHP with a wrapper libraryPython Ruby | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Server-seitige Scripts Stored Procedures | Yes, possible languages: KQL, Python, R | ja proprietäre Syntax | PL/SQL auch Java stored procedures möglich | benutzerdefinierte Funktionen realisiert z.B. mit spezifischer Sprache PL/pgSQL, aber auch andere Sprachen möglich (Perl, Python, Tcl, etc.) | nein | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Triggers | ja see docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/kusto/management/updatepolicy | ja | ja | ja | nein | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Partitionierungsmechanismen Methoden zum Speichern von unterschiedlichen Daten auf unterschiedlichen Knoten | Sharding Implicit feature of the cloud service | horizontale Partitionierung, Sharding mit MySQL Cluster oder MySQL Fabric | Sharding, horizontal partitioning | partitioning by range, list and (since PostgreSQL 11) by hash | keine | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Replikationsmechanismen Methoden zum redundanten Speichern von Daten auf mehreren Knoten | ja Implicit feature of the cloud service. Replication either local, cross-facility or geo-redundant. | Multi-Source Replikation Source-Replica Replikation | Multi-Source Replikation Source-Replica Replikation | Source-Replica Replikation andere Varianten durch Verwendung von 3rd party - tools | keine | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| MapReduce Bietet ein API für Map/Reduce Operationen | Spark connector (open source): github.com/Azure/azure-kusto-spark | nein | nein kann in PL/SQL realisiert werden | nein | nein | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Konsistenzkonzept Methoden zur Sicherstellung der Konsistenz in einem verteilten System | Eventual Consistency Immediate Consistency | Immediate Consistency | Immediate Consistency | Immediate Consistency | keine | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fremdschlüssel referenzielle Integrität | nein | ja nicht für MyISAM Storage Engine | ja | ja | nein | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Transaktionskonzept Unterstützung zur Sicherstellung der Datenintegrität bei nicht-atomaren Datenmanipulationen | nein | ACID nicht für MyISAM Storage Engine | ACID mit parameterisierbarem isolation level | ACID | nein | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Concurrency Unterstützung von gleichzeitig ausgeführten Datenmanipulationen | ja | ja Table Locks oder Row Locks abhängig von Storage Engine | ja | ja | ja by using the rrdcached daemon | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Durability Dauerhafte Speicherung der Daten | ja | ja | ja | ja | ja | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| In-Memory Unterstützung Gibt es Möglichkeiten einige oder alle Strukturen nur im Hauptspeicher zu halten | nein | ja | ja Version 12c introduced the new option 'Oracle Database In-Memory' | nein | ja | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Berechtigungskonzept Zugriffskontrolle | Azure Active Directory Authentication | Benutzer mit feingranularem Berechtigungskonzept keine Benutzergruppen oder Rollen | Benutzer mit feingranularem Berechtigungskonzept entsprechend SQL-Standard | Benutzer mit feingranularem Berechtigungskonzept entsprechend SQL-Standard | nein | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weitere Informationen bereitgestellt vom SystemherstellerWir laden Vertreter der Systemhersteller ein uns zu kontaktieren, um die Systeminformationen zu aktualisieren und zu ergänzen, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Zugehörige Produkte und Dienstleistungen | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Drittanbieter | CData: Connect to Big Data & NoSQL through standard Drivers. » mehr Navicat for MySQL is the ideal solution for MySQL/MariaDB administration and development. » mehr Aiven for MySQL: Fully managed MySQL, deployable in the cloud of your choice, with seamless integrations and lightning-fast setup. » mehr Navicat Monitor is a safe, simple and agentless remote server monitoring tool for MySQL and many other database management systems. » mehr | Devart ODBC driver for Oracle accesses Oracle databases from ODBC-compliant reporting, analytics, BI, and ETL tools on both 32 and 64-bit Windows, macOS, and Linux. » mehr Navicat for Oracle improves the efficiency and productivity of Oracle developers and administrators with a streamlined working environment. » mehr | Timescale: Calling all PostgreSQL users – the 2023 State of PostgreSQL survey is now open! Share your favorite extensions, preferred frameworks, community experiences, and more. Take the survey today!
» mehr Navicat Monitor is a safe, simple and agentless remote server monitoring tool for PostgreSQL and many other database management systems. » mehr CYBERTEC is your professional partner in PostgreSQL topics for over 20 years. As our main aim is to be your single-source all-in-one IT service provider, we offer a wide range of products and services. Visit our website for more details. » mehr SharePlex is the reliable and affordable data replication solution for PostgreSQL migrations, high availability and more. » mehr Instaclustr: Fully Hosted & Managed PostgreSQL » mehr Navicat for PostgreSQL is an easy-to-use graphical tool for PostgreSQL database development. » mehr Fujitsu Enterprise Postgres: An Enterprise Grade PostgreSQL with the flexibility of a hybrid cloud solution combined with industry leading security, availability and performance. » mehr pgDash: In-Depth PostgreSQL Monitoring. » mehr Aiven for PostgreSQL: Fully managed PostgreSQL for developers with 70+ extensions and flexible orchestration tools. » mehr Redgate webinars: A series of key topics for new PostgreSQL users. » mehr | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wir laden Vertreter von Anbietern von zugehörigen Produkten ein uns zu kontaktieren, um hier Informationen über ihre Angebote zu präsentieren. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Weitere Ressourcen | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Microsoft Azure Data Explorer | MySQL | Oracle | PostgreSQL | RRDtool | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| DB-Engines Blog Posts | MySQL is the DBMS of the Year 2019 MariaDB strengthens its position in the open source RDBMS market The struggle for the hegemony in Oracle's database empire | MySQL is the DBMS of the Year 2019 The struggle for the hegemony in Oracle's database empire Architecting eCommerce Platforms for Zero Downtime on Black Friday and Beyond | PostgreSQL is the DBMS of the Year 2023 Snowflake is the DBMS of the Year 2022, defending the title from last year Snowflake is the DBMS of the Year 2021 | Time Series DBMS are the database category with the fastest increase in popularity Time Series DBMS as a new trend? Oracle Cloud World Monitoring PostgreSQL with Redgate Monitor Azure Data Explorer: Log and telemetry analytics benchmark Providing modern data transfer and storage service at Microsoft with Microsoft Azure - Inside Track Blog Controlling costs in Azure Data Explorer using down-sampling and aggregation Individually great, collectively unmatched: Announcing updates to 3 great Azure Data Services Analytics in Azure is up to 14x faster and costs 94% less than other cloud providers. Why go anywhere else? bereitgestellt von Google News Amazon Aurora MySQL version 2 (with MySQL 5.7 compatibility) to version 3 (with MySQL 8.0 compatibility) upgrade ... Ultimate MySQL Workbench Installation Guide [2024 Edition] Zendesk Moves from DynamoDB to MySQL and S3 to Save over 80% in Costs How to Create a MySQL 8 Database User With Remote Access Rule::array() and whereJsonOverlaps() for MySQL in Laravel 11.7 bereitgestellt von Google News Understanding the different Oracle Database options under the OCI-Microsoft Azure partnership AI-Fueled Enterprise Data Management: The Rise Of Oracle Database 23ai Oracle Database 23ai Brings the Power of AI to Enterprise Data and Applications Oracle Database 23ai - all of your data should be in one place, argues CTO Larry Ellison Exadata System Software 24ai - Delivers mission critical AI at any scale bereitgestellt von Google News At Build, Microsoft Fabric, PostgreSQL and Cosmos DB get AI enhancements Nutanix partners with EDB to fit database service for AI – Blocks and Files Nutanix and EDB Partner to Deliver a Modern Data Platform Let PostgreSQL Pick An Index For You Continuously replicate Amazon DynamoDB changes to Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL using AWS Lambda | Amazon ... bereitgestellt von Google News SQLi vulnerability in Cacti could lead to RCE (CVE-2023-51448) A plotting utility for text mode consoles and terminals @tenox77 How to install Cacti SNMP Monitor on Ubuntu Cacti servers under attack by attackers exploiting CVE-2022-46169 Installation Guide for Collectd and Collectd-Web to Monitor Server Resources in Linux bereitgestellt von Google News | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Teilen sie diese Seite mit ihrem Netzwerk
