DBMS > Elasticsearch vs. Microsoft Access vs. openGauss vs. PostgreSQL vs. Tarantool
Vergleich der Systemeigenschaften Elasticsearch vs. Microsoft Access vs. openGauss vs. PostgreSQL vs. Tarantool
Redaktionelle Informationen bereitgestellt von DB-Engines | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name | Elasticsearch Xaus Vergleich ausschliessen | Microsoft Access Xaus Vergleich ausschliessen | openGauss Xaus Vergleich ausschliessen | PostgreSQL Xaus Vergleich ausschliessen | Tarantool Xaus Vergleich ausschliessen | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kurzbeschreibung | Eine moderne Such- und Analyseplattform basierend auf Apache Lucene Elasticsearch lets you perform and combine many types of searches such as structured, unstructured, geo, and metric | Microsoft Access kombiniert ein Backend (JET bzw. ACE Engine) mit einem grafischen Frontend zur Datenabfrage bzw. Datenmanipulation. Das Access-Frontend wird häufig auch für Zugriff auf andere Datenquellen (DBMS, Excel, etc) verwendet. | An enterprise-class RDBMS compatible with high-performance, high-availability and high-performance originally developed by Huawei | Weit verbreitetes, allgemein einsetzbares Open Source RDBMS Entwickelt als objektorientiertes DBMS, im Laufe der Zeit um 'Standards' wie SQL erweitert | In-memory computing platform with a flexible data schema for efficiently building high-performance applications | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Primäres Datenbankmodell | Suchmaschine | Relational DBMS | Relational DBMS | Relational DBMS mit objektorientierten Erweiterungen, z.B.: benutzerdefinierte Datentypen/Funktionen und Vererbung. Key/Value handling mit hstore Modul. | Document Store Key-Value Store Relational DBMS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sekundäre Datenbankmodelle | Document Store Spatial DBMS Vektor DBMS | Document Store Spatial DBMS | Document Store Graph DBMS with Apache Age Spatial DBMS Vektor DBMS with pgvector extension | Spatial DBMS with Tarantool/GIS extension | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Website | www.elastic.co/elasticsearch | www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/access | gitee.com/opengauss opengauss.org | www.postgresql.org | www.tarantool.io | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Technische Dokumentation | www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/index.html | developer.microsoft.com/en-us/access | docs.opengauss.org/en gitee.com/opengauss/docs | www.postgresql.org/docs | www.tarantool.io/en/doc | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Entwickler | Elastic | Microsoft | Huawei and openGauss community | PostgreSQL Global Development Group www.postgresql.org/developer | VK | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Erscheinungsjahr | 2010 | 1992 | 2019 | 1989 1989: Postgres, 1996: PostgreSQL | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Aktuelle Version | 8.6, January 2023 | 1902 (16.0.11328.20222), Maerz 2019 | 3.0, March 2022 | 16.3, Mai 2024 | 2.10.0, Mai 2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lizenz Commercial or Open Source | Open Source Elastic License | kommerziell Gebündelt mit Microsoft Office Lizenzen | Open Source | Open Source BSD | Open Source BSD-2, source-available extensions (modules), commercial licenses for Tarantool Enterprise | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ausschließlich ein Cloud-Service Nur als Cloud-Service verfügbar | nein | nein | nein | nein | nein | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBaaS Angebote (gesponserte Links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed. |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Implementierungssprache | Java | C++ | C, C++, Java | C | C und C++ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Server Betriebssysteme | Alle Betriebssysteme mit einer Java VM | Windows Kein eigentlicher Datenbank-Server, sondern Ausführung von DLL's. | Linux | FreeBSD HP-UX Linux NetBSD OpenBSD OS X Solaris Unix Windows | BSD Linux macOS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Datenschema | schemafrei Flexible Typdefinitionen, die - sobald definiert - persistent bleiben. | ja | ja | ja | Flexible data schema: relational definition for tables with ability to store json-like documents in columns | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Typisierung vordefinierte Datentypen, z.B. float oder date | ja | ja | ja | ja | string, double, decimal, uuid, integer, blob, boolean, datetime | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
XML Unterstützung Verarbeitung von Daten in XML Format, beispielsweise Speicherung von XML-Strukturen und/oder Unterstützung von XPath, XQuery, XSLT | nein | nein | ja specific XML-type available, but no XML query functionality. | nein | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sekundärindizes | ja Alle Suchfelder werden automatisch indiziert | ja | ja | ja | ja | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SQL Support of SQL | SQL-like query language | ja aber nicht SQL Standard konform | ANSI SQL 2011 | ja Standard mit zahlreichen Erweiterungen | Full-featured ANSI SQL support | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APIs und andere Zugriffskonzepte | Java API RESTful HTTP/JSON API | ADO.NET DAO ODBC OLE DB | JDBC ODBC | ADO.NET JDBC native C library ODBC streaming API for large objects | Open binary protocol | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unterstützte Programmiersprachen | .Net Groovy Community Contributed Clients Java JavaScript Perl PHP Python Ruby | C C# C++ Delphi Java (JDBC-ODBC) VBA Visual Basic.NET | C C++ Java | .Net C C++ Delphi Java JDBC JavaScript (Node.js) Perl PHP Python Tcl | C C# C++ Erlang Go Java JavaScript Lua Perl PHP Python Rust | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Server-seitige Scripts Stored Procedures | ja | ja ab Access 2010 mit ACE-Engine | ja | benutzerdefinierte Funktionen realisiert z.B. mit spezifischer Sprache PL/pgSQL, aber auch andere Sprachen möglich (Perl, Python, Tcl, etc.) | Lua, C and SQL stored procedures | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Triggers | ja Mittels Verwendung des 'Percolation' features | ja ab Access 2010 mit ACE-Engine | ja | ja | ja | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Partitionierungsmechanismen Methoden zum Speichern von unterschiedlichen Daten auf unterschiedlichen Knoten | Sharding | keine | horizontal partitioning (by range, list and hash) | partitioning by range, list and (since PostgreSQL 11) by hash | Sharding, partitioned with virtual buckets by user defined affinity key. Live resharding for scale up and scale down without maintenance downtime. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Replikationsmechanismen Methoden zum redundanten Speichern von Daten auf mehreren Knoten | ja | keine | Source-Replica Replikation | Source-Replica Replikation andere Varianten durch Verwendung von 3rd party - tools | Asynchronous replication with multi-master option Configurable replication topology (full-mesh, chain, star) Synchronous quorum replication (with Raft) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MapReduce Bietet ein API für Map/Reduce Operationen | ES-Hadoop Connector | nein | nein | nein | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Konsistenzkonzept Methoden zur Sicherstellung der Konsistenz in einem verteilten System | Eventual Consistency Synchrone dokumentenbasierte Replikation. Write consistency konfigurierbar: one, quorum, all | Immediate Consistency | Immediate Consistency | Casual consistency across sharding partitions Eventual consistency within replicaset partition when using asyncronous replication Immediate Consistency within single instance Sequential consistency including linearizable read within replicaset partition when using Raft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fremdschlüssel referenzielle Integrität | nein | ja | ja | ja | yes | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transaktionskonzept Unterstützung zur Sicherstellung der Datenintegrität bei nicht-atomaren Datenmanipulationen | nein | ACID aber keine Files für Transaktions-Logging | ACID | ACID | ACID, with serializable isolation and linearizable read (within partition); Configurable MVCC (within partition); No cross-shard distributed transactions | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Concurrency Unterstützung von gleichzeitig ausgeführten Datenmanipulationen | ja | ja | ja | ja | ja | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Durability Dauerhafte Speicherung der Daten | ja | ja aber keine Files für Transaktions-Logging | ja | ja | yes, write ahead logging | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In-Memory Unterstützung Gibt es Möglichkeiten einige oder alle Strukturen nur im Hauptspeicher zu halten | Memcached and Redis integration | nein | nein | yes, full featured in-memory storage engine with persistence | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Berechtigungskonzept Zugriffskontrolle | nein einfache Benutzerverwaltung war vorhanden bis zur Version Access 2003 | Access rights for users, groups and roles according to SQL-standard | Benutzer mit feingranularem Berechtigungskonzept entsprechend SQL-Standard | Access Control Lists Mutual TLS authentication for Tarantol Enterprise Password based authentication Role-based access control (RBAC) and LDAP for Tarantol Enterprise Users and Roles | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weitere Informationen bereitgestellt vom SystemherstellerWir laden Vertreter der Systemhersteller ein uns zu kontaktieren, um die Systeminformationen zu aktualisieren und zu ergänzen, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Zugehörige Produkte und Dienstleistungen | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Drittanbieter | Navicat for PostgreSQL is an easy-to-use graphical tool for PostgreSQL database development. » mehr Fujitsu Enterprise Postgres: An Enterprise Grade PostgreSQL with the flexibility of a hybrid cloud solution combined with industry leading security, availability and performance. » mehr pgDash: In-Depth PostgreSQL Monitoring. » mehr Instaclustr: Fully Hosted & Managed PostgreSQL » mehr Redgate webinars: A series of key topics for new PostgreSQL users. » mehr SharePlex is the reliable and affordable data replication solution for PostgreSQL migrations, high availability and more. » mehr Timescale: Calling all PostgreSQL users – the 2023 State of PostgreSQL survey is now open! Share your favorite extensions, preferred frameworks, community experiences, and more. Take the survey today! » mehr Aiven for PostgreSQL: Fully managed PostgreSQL for developers with 70+ extensions and flexible orchestration tools. » mehr CYBERTEC is your professional partner in PostgreSQL topics for over 20 years. As our main aim is to be your single-source all-in-one IT service provider, we offer a wide range of products and services. Visit our website for more details. » mehr Navicat Monitor is a safe, simple and agentless remote server monitoring tool for PostgreSQL and many other database management systems. » mehr | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wir laden Vertreter von Anbietern von zugehörigen Produkten ein uns zu kontaktieren, um hier Informationen über ihre Angebote zu präsentieren. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weitere Ressourcen | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Elasticsearch | Microsoft Access | openGauss | PostgreSQL | Tarantool | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DB-Engines Blog Posts | PostgreSQL is the DBMS of the Year 2017 Elasticsearch moved into the top 10 most popular database management systems MySQL, PostgreSQL and Redis are the winners of the March ranking | MS Access drops in DB-Engines Ranking Microsoft SQL Server regained rank 2 in the DB-Engines popularity ranking New DB-Engines Ranking shows the popularity of database management systems | PostgreSQL is the DBMS of the Year 2023 Snowflake is the DBMS of the Year 2022, defending the title from last year Snowflake is the DBMS of the Year 2021 | Data processing speed and reliability: in-memory synchronous replication Monitoring PostgreSQL with Redgate Monitor Elasticsearch Enables 400 Criteo Engineers to Search 4 TB of Log Data per Week Netflix Uses Elasticsearch Percolate Queries to Implement Reverse Searches Efficiently Splunk vs Elasticsearch | A Comparison and How to Choose Introducing Elasticsearch Vector Database to Azure OpenAI Service On Your Data (Preview) ElasticSearch Goes Deep on OpenTelemetry with eBPF Donation bereitgestellt von Google News Abusing Microsoft Access "Linked Table" Feature to Perform NTLM Forced Authentication Attacks Hackers Exploit Microsoft Access Feature to Steal Windows User’s NTLM Tokens MS access program to increase awareness and independence of those living with MS and disability How to Connect MS Access to MySQL via ODBC Driver People living with MS who are severely immunocompromised can access newly funded shingles vaccine bereitgestellt von Google News openGauss Open Source Community Officially Launch The openGauss powers database industry forward through innovation bereitgestellt von Google News Continuously replicate Amazon DynamoDB changes to Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL using AWS Lambda | Amazon ... SolarWinds Unveils Enhanced Database Performance Analyzer with Advanced PostgreSQL Support General availability: Microsoft Entra ID integration with Azure Cosmos DB for PostgreSQL | Azure updates ServiceNow trades MariaDB for RaptorDB (PostgreSQL) Best of Makers: PostgreSQL Takes a New Turn bereitgestellt von Google News Deploying Tarantool Cartridge applications with zero effort (Part 1) VShard — horizontal scaling in Tarantool Accelerating PHP connectors for Tarantool using Async, Swoole, and Parallel bereitgestellt von Google News |
Teilen sie diese Seite mit ihrem Netzwerk