DBMS > Amazon Redshift vs. Citus vs. FoundationDB vs. GigaSpaces vs. Oracle
System Properties Comparison Amazon Redshift vs. Citus vs. FoundationDB vs. GigaSpaces vs. Oracle
Editorial information provided by DB-Engines | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name | Amazon Redshift Xexclude from comparison | Citus Xexclude from comparison | FoundationDB Xexclude from comparison | GigaSpaces Xexclude from comparison | Oracle Xexclude from comparison | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Created as commercial project in 2013, FoundationDB has been acquired by Apple in March 2015 and was withdrawn from the market. As a consequence, the product was removed from the DB-Engines ranking. In April 2018, Apple open-sourced FoundationDB and it therefore reappears in the ranking. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description | Large scale data warehouse service for use with business intelligence tools | Scalable hybrid operational and analytics RDBMS for big data use cases based on PostgreSQL | Ordered key-value store. Core features are complimented by layers. | High performance in-memory data grid platform, powering three products: Smart Cache, Smart ODS (Operational Data Store), Smart Augmented Transactions | Widely used RDBMS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Primary database model | Relational DBMS | Relational DBMS | Document store supported via specific layer Key-value store Relational DBMS supported via specific SQL-layer | Document store Object oriented DBMS Values are user defined objects | Relational DBMS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Secondary database models | Document store | Graph DBMS Search engine | Document store Graph DBMS with Oracle Spatial and Graph RDF store with Oracle Spatial and Graph Spatial DBMS with Oracle Spatial and Graph Vector DBMS since Oracle 23 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Website | aws.amazon.com/redshift | www.citusdata.com | github.com/apple/foundationdb | www.gigaspaces.com | www.oracle.com/database | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Technical documentation | docs.aws.amazon.com/redshift | docs.citusdata.com | apple.github.io/foundationdb | docs.gigaspaces.com/latest/landing.html | docs.oracle.com/en/database | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developer | Amazon (based on PostgreSQL) | FoundationDB | Gigaspaces Technologies | Oracle | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Initial release | 2012 | 2010 | 2013 | 2000 | 1980 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current release | 8.1, December 2018 | 6.2.28, November 2020 | 15.5, September 2020 | 23c, September 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
License Commercial or Open Source | commercial | Open Source AGPL, commercial license also available | Open Source Apache 2.0 | Open Source Apache Version 2; Commercial licenses available | commercial restricted free version is available | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service | yes | no | no | no | no | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Implementation language | C | C | C++ | Java, C++, .Net | C and C++ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Server operating systems | hosted | Linux | Linux OS X Windows | Linux macOS Solaris Windows | AIX HP-UX Linux OS X Solaris Windows z/OS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Data scheme | yes | yes | schema-free some layers support schemas | schema-free | yes Schemaless in JSON and XML columns | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Typing predefined data types such as float or date | yes | yes | no some layers support typing | yes | yes | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT. | no | yes specific XML type available, but no XML query functionality | no XML can be used for describing objects metadata | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Secondary indexes | restricted | yes | no | yes | yes | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SQL Support of SQL | yes does not fully support an SQL-standard | yes standard, with numerous extensions | supported in specific SQL layer only | SQL-99 for query and DML statements | yes with proprietary extensions | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APIs and other access methods | JDBC ODBC | ADO.NET JDBC native C library ODBC streaming API for large objects | GigaSpaces LRMI Hibernate JCache JDBC JPA ODBC RESTful HTTP API Spring Data | JDBC ODBC ODP.NET Oracle Call Interface (OCI) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Supported programming languages | All languages supporting JDBC/ODBC | .Net C C++ Delphi Java JavaScript (Node.js) Perl PHP Python Tcl | .Net C C++ Go Java JavaScript Node.js PHP Python Ruby Swift | .Net C++ Java Python Scala | C C# C++ Clojure Cobol Delphi Eiffel Erlang Fortran Groovy Haskell Java JavaScript Lisp Objective C OCaml Perl PHP Python R Ruby Scala Tcl Visual Basic | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Server-side scripts Stored procedures | user defined functions in Python | user defined functions realized in proprietary language PL/pgSQL or with common languages like Perl, Python, Tcl etc. | in SQL-layer only | yes | PL/SQL also stored procedures in Java possible | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Triggers | no | yes | no | yes, event driven architecture | yes | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes | Sharding | Sharding | Sharding | Sharding | Sharding, horizontal partitioning | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes | yes | Source-replica replication other methods possible by using 3rd party extensions | yes | Multi-source replication synchronous or asynchronous Source-replica replication synchronous or asynchronous | Multi-source replication Source-replica replication | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods | no | no | no | yes Map-Reduce pattern can be built with XAP task executors | no can be realized in PL/SQL | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system | Immediate Consistency | Immediate Consistency | Linearizable consistency | Immediate Consistency Consistency level configurable: ALL, QUORUM, ANY | Immediate Consistency | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign keys Referential integrity | yes informational only, not enforced by the system | yes | in SQL-layer only | no | yes | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data | ACID | ACID | ACID | ACID | ACID isolation level can be parameterized | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Durability Support for making data persistent | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only. | yes | no | yes | yes Version 12c introduced the new option 'Oracle Database In-Memory' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
User concepts Access control | fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard | fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard | no | Role-based access control | fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
More information provided by the system vendorWe invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related products and services | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3rd parties | CData: Connect to Big Data & NoSQL through standard Drivers. » more | Navicat for Oracle improves the efficiency and productivity of Oracle developers and administrators with a streamlined working environment. » more Devart ODBC driver for Oracle accesses Oracle databases from ODBC-compliant reporting, analytics, BI, and ETL tools on both 32 and 64-bit Windows, macOS, and Linux. » more | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
More resources | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amazon Redshift | Citus | FoundationDB | GigaSpaces | Oracle | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DB-Engines blog posts | Cloud-based DBMS's popularity grows at high rates The popularity of cloud-based DBMSs has increased tenfold in four years Increased popularity for consuming DBMS services out of the cloud | MySQL is the DBMS of the Year 2019 The struggle for the hegemony in Oracle's database empire Architecting eCommerce Platforms for Zero Downtime on Black Friday and Beyond Oracle Cloud World Revolutionizing data querying: Amazon Redshift and Visual Studio Code integration | Amazon Web Services Amazon Redshift adds new AI capabilities, including Amazon Q, to boost efficiency and productivity | Amazon Web ... Best practices to implement near-real-time analytics using Amazon Redshift Streaming Ingestion with Amazon MSK ... Power analytics as a service capabilities using Amazon Redshift | Amazon Web Services Amazon Aurora MySQL zero-ETL integration with Amazon Redshift is now generally available | Amazon Web Services provided by Google News Ubicloud wants to build an open source alternative to AWS How Citus Health Uses AWS to Provide Secure and Real-Time Virtual Patient Care - AWS Startups Microsoft Benchmarks Distributed PostgreSQL DBs Microsoft acquires Citus Data, re-affirming its commitment to Open Source and accelerating Azure PostgreSQL ... Distributed PostgreSQL Benchmarks: Azure Cosmos DB, CockroachDB, and YugabyteDB provided by Google News FoundationDB team's new venture, Antithesis, raises $47M to enhance software testing Stonebraker Seeks to Invert the Computing Paradigm with DBOS Antithesis raises $47M to launch an automated testing platform for software Deno adds scaleable messaging with new Queues feature, sparks debate about proprietary services • DEVCLASS FoundationDB, a very interesting NoSQL database owned by Apple, is now an open-source project provided by Google News GigaSpaces to hand out almost $14 million in dividends following Cloudify’s acquisition by Dell Data Sciences Corporation partners with GigaSpaces Technologies to usher DIH technology to enterprises in SA GigaSpaces Announces Version 16.0 with Breakthrough Data Integration Tools to Ease Enterprises' Digital ... GigaSpaces Spins Off Cloudify, Its Open Source Cloud Orchestration Unit Your occasional storage digest with GigaSpaces, Virtana and NAND ship data – Blocks and Files provided by Google News AI-Fueled Enterprise Data Management: The Rise Of Oracle Database 23ai Observability & Management services to manage a large Oracle Database fleet Oracle Database 23ai - all of your data should be in one place, argues CTO Larry Ellison Oracle CEO says more tech can help offset tech's worst effects Oracle renames Database 23c to 23ai, makes it generally available provided by Google News |
Share this page