DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Badger vs. Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs. OpenQM

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Badger vs. Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs. OpenQM

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	Badger  Xexclude from comparison	Microsoft Azure SQL Database formerly SQL Azure  Xexclude from comparison	OpenQM also called QM  Xexclude from comparison
	This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.
Description	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	An embeddable, persistent, simple and fast Key-Value Store, written purely in Go.	Database as a Service offering with high compatibility to Microsoft SQL Server	QpenQM is a high-performance, self-tuning, multi-value DBMS
Primary database model	Document store Key-value store	Key-value store	Relational DBMS	Multivalue DBMS
Secondary database models			Document store Graph DBMS Spatial DBMS
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart		Score 0.22 Rank #320   Overall #47   Key-value stores	Score 76.78 Rank #16   Overall #11   Relational DBMS	Score 0.34 Rank #284   Overall #10   Multivalue DBMS
Website	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	github.com/­dgraph-io/­badger	azure.microsoft.com/­en-us/­products/­azure-sql/­database	www.rocketsoftware.com/­products/­rocket-multivalue-application-development-platform/­rocket-open-qm
Technical documentation		godoc.org/­github.com/­dgraph-io/­badger	docs.microsoft.com/­en-us/­azure/­azure-sql
Developer	Atos Convergence Creators	DGraph Labs	Microsoft	Rocket Software, originally Martin Phillips
Initial release	2016	2017	2010	1993
Current release	1703		V12	3.4-12
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	Open Source Apache 2.0	commercial	Open Source GPLv2, extended commercial license available
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	yes	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Java	Go	C++
Server operating systems	Linux	BSD Linux OS X Solaris Windows	hosted	AIX FreeBSD Linux macOS Raspberry Pi Solaris Windows
Data scheme	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	schema-free	yes	yes with some exceptions
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	optional	no	yes
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	yes	no	yes	yes
Secondary indexes	yes	no	yes	yes
SQL Support of SQL	no	no	yes	no
APIs and other access methods	LDAP		ADO.NET JDBC ODBC
Supported programming languages	All languages with LDAP bindings	Go	.Net C# Java JavaScript (Node.js) PHP Python Ruby	.Net Basic C Java Objective C PHP Python
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	no	Transact SQL	yes
Triggers	yes	no	yes	yes
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding cell division	none		yes
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	yes	none	yes, with always 3 replicas available	yes
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods		no	no	no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration	none	Immediate Consistency	Immediate Consistency
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	no	yes	no
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	Atomic execution of specific operations	no	ACID	ACID
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes	yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes	yes	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes	no
User concepts Access control	LDAP bind authentication	no	fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard	Access rights can be defined down to the item level
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Atos Standard Common Repository	Badger	Microsoft Azure SQL Database formerly SQL Azure	OpenQM also called QM
DB-Engines blog posts			PostgreSQL is the DBMS of the Year 2020 4 January 2021, Paul Andlinger, Matthias Gelbmann Cloud-based DBMS's popularity grows at high rates 12 December 2019, Paul Andlinger The popularity of cloud-based DBMSs has increased tenfold in four years 7 February 2017, Matthias Gelbmann show all
Recent citations in the news			Copilot in Azure SQL Database in Private Preview 27 March 2024, InfoQ.com Microsoft unveils Copilot for Azure SQL Database 27 March 2024, InfoWorld Azure SQL Database migration to OCI - resources estimation and migration approach 11 January 2024, blogs.oracle.com Expand the limits of innovation with Azure data 21 March 2024, microsoft.com Why migrate Windows Server and SQL Server to Azure: ROI, innovation, and free offers 25 April 2024, microsoft.com provided by Google News

Share this page