DBMS > LMDB vs. OpenTenBase vs. OrigoDB vs. Percona Server for MySQL vs. XTDB

System Properties Comparison LMDB vs. OpenTenBase vs. OrigoDB vs. Percona Server for MySQL vs. XTDB

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

A high performant, light-weight, embedded key-value database library

An enterprise-level distributed HTAP open source database based on PostgreSQL

A fully ACID in-memory object graph database

Enhanced drop-in replacement for MySQL based on XtraDB or TokuDB storage engines with improved performance and additional diagnostic and management features.

A general purpose database with bitemporal SQL and Datalog and graph queries

Primary database model

Key-value store

Relational DBMS

Document store
Object oriented DBMS

Relational DBMS

Document store

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	1.99
Rank	#125	Overall
	#21	Key-value stores

Score	0.00
Rank	#383	Overall
	#158	Relational DBMS

Score	0.00
Rank	#383	Overall
	#53	Document stores
	#20	Object oriented DBMS

Score	2.03
Rank	#122	Overall
	#57	Relational DBMS

Score	0.11
Rank	#343	Overall
	#46	Document stores

Website

www.symas.com/symas-embedded-database-lmdb

github.com/OpenTenBase/OpenTenBase
www.opentenbase.org

origodb.com

www.percona.com/software/mysql-database/percona-server

github.com/xtdb/xtdb
www.xtdb.com

Technical documentation

www.lmdb.tech/doc

docs.opentenbase.org
docs.opentenbase.org/en

origodb.com/docs

www.percona.com/downloads/Percona-Server-LATEST

www.xtdb.com/docs

Developer

Symas

OpenAtom Foundation, previously Tencent

Robert Friberg et al

Percona

Juxt Ltd.

Initial release

2011

2009

under the name LiveDB

2008

2019

Current release

0.9.32, January 2024

2.5, January 2024

8.0.36-28, 2024

1.19, September 2021

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

BSD-3

Open Source

GPL version 2

Open Source

MIT License

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

C and C++

Clojure

Server operating systems

Linux
Unix
Windows

Linux

Linux
Windows

Linux

All OS with a Java 8 (and higher) VM
Linux

Data scheme

schema-free

yes

schema-free

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

User defined using .NET types and collections

yes

yes, extensible-data-notation format

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

can be achieved using .NET

yes

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

yes

limited SQL, making use of Apache Calcite

APIs and other access methods

.NET Client API
HTTP API
LINQ

ADO.NET
JDBC
ODBC

HTTP REST
JDBC

Supported programming languages

.Net
C
C++
Clojure
Go
Haskell
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
Lisp
Lua
MatLab
Nim
Objective C
OCaml
Perl
PHP
Python
R
Ruby
Rust
Swift
Tcl

C
Go
Java
PHP
Python

.Net

Ada
C
C#
C++
D
Eiffel
Erlang
Haskell
Java
Objective-C
OCaml
Perl
PHP
Python
Ruby
Scheme
Tcl

Clojure
Java

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

yes

Triggers

yes

Domain Events

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

none

Sharding

horizontal partitioning

client side managed; servers are not synchronized

none

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

none

yes

Source-replica replication

Multi-source replication
Source-replica replication
XtraDB Cluster

yes, each node contains all data

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

depending on model

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

Write ahead log

yes

yes, flexibel persistency by using storage technologies like Apache Kafka, RocksDB or LMDB

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

Access rights for users, groups and roles according to SQL-standard

Role based authorization

Users with fine-grained authorization concept

no user groups or roles

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

The Tom Brady Data Biography
8 September 2023, StatsBomb

Automating SAP S/4HANA Migration with IT-Conductor, BGP Managed Services, and AWS | Amazon Web Services
22 August 2023, AWS Blog

The Lightning Memory-mapped Database
2 March 2016, InfoQ.com

Branch Out Your SQLite Database With LiteTree
2 September 2018, Hackaday

PowerDNS an open source DNS server
23 January 2021, Desde Linux

provided by Google News

A Momentous 2023, Headlined by a 19% increase of ARR, Positions Percona for Even Greater Success in the Year ...
27 March 2024, Business Wire

Update or migrate? Planning for MySQL 5.7 EOL
22 June 2023, InfoWorld

Sizing Up Servers: Intel's Skylake-SP Xeon versus AMD's EPYC 7000 - The Server CPU Battle of the Decade?
11 July 2017, AnandTech

ScaleFlux computational storage makes Percona MySQL faster – Blocks and Files
5 August 2020, Blocks & Files

How to deploy the Percona database performance monitor with Docker
24 February 2023, TechRepublic

provided by Google News

Share this page