DBMS > Galaxybase vs. Hawkular Metrics vs. SAP Advantage Database Server vs. Teradata

System Properties Comparison Galaxybase vs. Hawkular Metrics vs. SAP Advantage Database Server vs. Teradata

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Galaxybase  Xexclude from comparison	Hawkular Metrics  Xexclude from comparison	SAP Advantage Database Server former name: Sybase ADS  Xexclude from comparison	Teradata  Xexclude from comparison
			SAP Advantage Database Server seems to be discontinued. Therefore it is excluded from the DB-Engines Ranking.
Description	Scalable, ACID-compliant native distributed parallel graph platform	Hawkular metrics is the metric storage of the Red Hat sponsored Hawkular monitoring system. It is based on Cassandra.	Low-cost RDBMS with access to ISAM and FoxPro data structures	A hybrid cloud data analytics software platform (Teradata Vantage)
Primary database model	Graph DBMS	Time Series DBMS	Relational DBMS	Relational DBMS
Secondary database models				Document store Graph DBMS Spatial DBMS Time Series DBMS
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart	Score 0.07 Rank #377   Overall #40   Graph DBMS	Score 0.08 Rank #366   Overall #39   Time Series DBMS		Score 44.87 Rank #22   Overall #15   Relational DBMS
Website	galaxybase.com	www.hawkular.org	www.sap.com/products/advantage-database-server.html	www.teradata.com
Technical documentation		www.hawkular.org/­hawkular-metrics/­docs/­user-guide		docs.teradata.com
Developer	Chuanglin(Createlink) Technology Co., Ltd 浙江创邻科技有限公司	Community supported by Red Hat	Sybase, SAP	Teradata
Initial release	2017	2014	1993	1984
Current release	Nov 20, November 2021			Teradata Vantage 1.0 MU2, January 2019
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	Open Source Apache 2.0	commercial	commercial
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	C and Java	Java
Server operating systems	Linux	Linux OS X Windows	Linux Windows	hosted Linux
Data scheme	Strong typed schema	schema-free	yes	yes
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	yes	yes	yes	yes
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	no	no	no	yes
Secondary indexes	yes	no	yes	yes Join-index to prejoin tables, aggregate index, sparse index, hash index
SQL Support of SQL	no	no	yes	yes SQL 2016 + extensions
APIs and other access methods	Browser interface console (shell) Graph API (Gremlin) OpenCypher Proprietary native API	HTTP REST	.NET Client API ADO.NET JDBC ODBC OLE DB	.NET Client API HTTP REST JDBC JMS Adapter ODBC OLE DB
Supported programming languages	Go Java Python	Go Java Python Ruby	Delphi Perl PHP	C C++ Cobol Java (JDBC-ODBC) Perl PL/1 Python R Ruby
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	user defined procedures and functions	no	yes	yes UDFs, stored procedures, table functions in parallel
Triggers		yes via Hawkular Alerting	yes	yes
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding	Sharding based on Cassandra	none	Sharding Hashing
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes		selectable replication factor based on Cassandra	Multi-source replication CONFLICT Trigger to resolve replication conflicts Source-replica replication	Multi-source replication Source-replica replication
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods	no	no	no	no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency	Eventual Consistency based on Cassandra Immediate Consistency based on Cassandra	Immediate Consistency	Immediate Consistency
Foreign keys Referential integrity	yes Relationships in graphs	no	yes	yes
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	ACID	no	ACID	ACID
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes	yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes	yes	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes	no	no caching of (temporary) tables can be configured	yes
User concepts Access control	Role-based access control	no	fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard	fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Galaxybase	Hawkular Metrics	SAP Advantage Database Server former name: Sybase ADS	Teradata
DB-Engines blog posts				Teradata is the most popular data warehouse DBMS 2 April 2013, Paul Andlinger show all
Recent citations in the news		Waiting for Red Hat OpenShift 4.0? Too late, 4.1 has already arrived… • DEVCLASS 5 June 2019, DevClass provided by Google News	SAP Announces Q3 2023 Results: Asia Pacific and Japan View 19 October 2023, SAP News provided by Google News	Teradata Co. (NYSE:TDC) Shares Sold by Capital International Investors 8 June 2024, MarketBeat Teradata to Present at Upcoming Investor Conference 6 June 2024, businesswire.com Teradata (TDC) Down 2.5% Since Last Earnings Report: Can It Rebound? 5 June 2024, Yahoo Finance Teradata Fails to Block Software Broker From Selling Its Products 3 June 2024, Bloomberg Law What to Expect From Teradata 7 June 2024, AOL provided by Google News

Share this page