DBMS > Coveo vs. Datomic vs. IRONdb vs. OpenTenBase vs. RocksDB

System Properties Comparison Coveo vs. Datomic vs. IRONdb vs. OpenTenBase vs. RocksDB

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

IRONdb seems to be discontinued. Therefore it is excluded from the DB-Engines Ranking.

Description

AI-powered hosted search, recommendation and personalization platform providing tools for both low-code and full-code development

Datomic builds on immutable values, supports point-in-time queries and uses 3rd party systems for durability

A distributed Time Series DBMS with a focus on scalability, fault tolerance and operational simplicity

An enterprise-level distributed HTAP open source database based on PostgreSQL

Embeddable persistent key-value store optimized for fast storage (flash and RAM)

Primary database model

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	2.11
Rank	#118	Overall
	#11	Search engines

Score	1.66
Rank	#144	Overall
	#66	Relational DBMS

Score	0.08
Rank	#370	Overall
	#156	Relational DBMS

Score	3.41
Rank	#86	Overall
	#11	Key-value stores

Website

www.coveo.com

www.datomic.com

www.circonus.com/solutions/time-series-database/

github.com/OpenTenBase/OpenTenBase
www.opentenbase.org

rocksdb.org

Technical documentation

docs.coveo.com

docs.datomic.com

docs.circonus.com/irondb/category/getting-started

docs.opentenbase.org
docs.opentenbase.org/en

github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki

Developer

Coveo

Cognitect

Circonus LLC.

OpenAtom Foundation, previously Tencent

Facebook, Inc.

Initial release

2012

2017

2013

Current release

1.0.7075, December 2023

V0.10.20, January 2018

2.5, January 2024

9.2.1, May 2024

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

limited edition free

commercial

Open Source

BSD-3

Open Source

BSD

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

yes

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Java, Clojure

C and C++

C++

Server operating systems

hosted

All OS with a Java VM

Linux

Data scheme

hybrid - fields need to be configured prior to indexing, but relationships can be exploited at query time without pre-configuration

yes

schema-free

yes

schema-free

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

text, numeric, histograms

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

SQL-like query language (Circonus Analytics Query Language: CAQL)

yes

APIs and other access methods

RESTful HTTP API

HTTP API

C++ API
Java API

Supported programming languages

C#
Java
JavaScript
Python

Clojure
Java

.Net
C
C++
Clojure
Erlang
Go
Haskell
Java
JavaScript
JavaScript (Node.js)
Lisp
Lua
Perl
PHP
Python
R
Ruby
Rust
Scala

C
Go
Java
PHP
Python

C
C++
Go
Java
Perl
Python
Ruby

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

yes

Transaction Functions

yes, in Lua

Triggers

yes

By using transaction functions

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

yes

none

But extensive use of caching in the application peers

Automatic, metric affinity per node

Sharding

horizontal partitioning

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

yes

none

But extensive use of caching in the application peers

configurable replication factor, datacenter aware

yes

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Immediate consistency per node, eventual consistency across nodes

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

yes

ACID

yes

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

using external storage systems (e.g. Cassandra, DynamoDB, PostgreSQL, Couchbase and others)

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

recommended only for testing and development

yes

User concepts

Access control

granular access controls, API key management, content filters

Access rights for users, groups and roles according to SQL-standard

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.