DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Sequoiadb vs. Teradata vs. YottaDB

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Sequoiadb vs. Teradata vs. YottaDB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.

Description

Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks

NewSQL database with distributed OLTP and SQL

A hybrid cloud data analytics software platform (Teradata Vantage)

A fast and solid embedded Key-value store

Primary database model

Document store
Key-value store

Document store
Relational DBMS

Relational DBMS

Key-value store

Secondary database models

Document store
Graph DBMS
Spatial DBMS
Time Series DBMS

Relational DBMS

using the Octo plugin

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.50
Rank	#258	Overall
	#41	Document stores
	#120	Relational DBMS

Score	44.87
Rank	#22	Overall
	#15	Relational DBMS

Score	0.28
Rank	#306	Overall
	#44	Key-value stores

Website

atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository

www.sequoiadb.com

www.teradata.com

yottadb.com

Technical documentation

www.sequoiadb.com/en/index.php?m=Files&a=index

docs.teradata.com

yottadb.com/resources/documentation

Developer

Atos Convergence Creators

Sequoiadb Ltd.

Teradata

YottaDB, LLC

Initial release

2016

2013

1984

2001

Current release

1703

Teradata Vantage 1.0 MU2, January 2019

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

Open Source

Server: AGPL; Client: Apache V2

commercial

Open Source

AGPL 3.0

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Java

C++

Server operating systems

Linux

hosted
Linux

Docker
Linux

Data scheme

Schema and schema-less with LDAP views

schema-free

yes

schema-free

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

optional

yes

oid, date, timestamp, binary, regex

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

Secondary indexes

yes

Join-index to prejoin tables, aggregate index, sparse index, hash index

SQL

Support of SQL

SQL-like query language

yes

SQL 2016 + extensions

by using the Octo plugin

APIs and other access methods

LDAP

proprietary protocol using JSON

.NET Client API
HTTP REST
JDBC
JMS Adapter
ODBC
OLE DB

PostgreSQL wire protocol

using the Octo plugin
Proprietary protocol

Supported programming languages

All languages with LDAP bindings

.Net
C++
Java
PHP
Python

C
C++
Cobol
Java (JDBC-ODBC)
Perl
PL/1
Python
R
Ruby

C
Go
JavaScript (Node.js)
Lua
M
Perl
Python
Rust

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

JavaScript

yes

UDFs, stored procedures, table functions in parallel

Triggers

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Sharding

cell division

Sharding

Hashing

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

yes

Source-replica replication

Multi-source replication
Source-replica replication

yes

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration

Eventual Consistency

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

Atomic execution of specific operations

Document is locked during a transaction

ACID

optimistic locking

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

LDAP bind authentication

simple password-based access control

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

Users and groups based on OS-security mechanisms

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

DB-Engines blog posts

Teradata is the most popular data warehouse DBMS
2 April 2013, Paul Andlinger

show all

Recent citations in the news

Teradata Buys Data Archiving Firm RainStor
31 May 2024, Data Center Knowledge

Is There Now An Opportunity In Teradata Corporation (NYSE:TDC)?
28 May 2024, Yahoo Finance

Lakehouse dam breaks after departure of long-time Teradata CTO
1 May 2024, The Register

Should You Be Excited About Teradata Corporation's (NYSE:TDC) 78% Return On Equity?
27 May 2024, Simply Wall St

Corient Private Wealth LLC Sells 41,270 Shares of Teradata Co. (NYSE:TDC)
30 May 2024, MarketBeat

provided by Google News

Share this page