DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. InfinityDB vs. OpenTenBase vs. Yaacomo

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. InfinityDB vs. OpenTenBase vs. Yaacomo

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	InfinityDB  Xexclude from comparison	OpenTenBase  Xexclude from comparison	Yaacomo  Xexclude from comparison
	This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.			Yaacomo seems to be discontinued and is removed from the DB-Engines ranking
Description	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	A Java embedded Key-Value Store which extends the Java Map interface	An enterprise-level distributed HTAP open source database based on PostgreSQL	OpenCL based in-memory RDBMS, designed for efficiently utilizing the hardware via parallel computing
Primary database model	Document store Key-value store	Key-value store	Relational DBMS	Relational DBMS
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart		Score 0.08 Rank #365   Overall #55   Key-value stores	Score 0.08 Rank #370   Overall #156   Relational DBMS
Website	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	boilerbay.com	github.com/­OpenTenBase/­OpenTenBase www.opentenbase.org	yaacomo.com
Technical documentation		boilerbay.com/­infinitydb/­manual	docs.opentenbase.org docs.opentenbase.org/­en
Developer	Atos Convergence Creators	Boiler Bay Inc.	OpenAtom Foundation, previously Tencent	Q2WEB GmbH
Initial release	2016	2002		2009
Current release	1703	4.0	2.5, January 2024
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	commercial	Open Source BSD-3	commercial
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Java	Java
Server operating systems	Linux	All OS with a Java VM	Linux	Android Linux Windows
Data scheme	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	yes nested virtual Java Maps, multi-value, logical ‘tuple space’ runtime Schema upgrade	yes	yes
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	optional	yes all Java primitives, Date, CLOB, BLOB, huge sparse arrays	yes	yes
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	yes	no		no
Secondary indexes	yes	no manual creation possible, using inversions based on multi-value capability	yes	yes
SQL Support of SQL	no	no	yes	yes
APIs and other access methods	LDAP	Access via java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentNavigableMap Interface Proprietary API to InfinityDB ItemSpace (boilerbay.com/­docs/­ItemSpaceDataStructures.htm)		JDBC ODBC
Supported programming languages	All languages with LDAP bindings	Java	C Go Java PHP Python
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	no
Triggers	yes	no	yes	yes
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding cell division	none	Sharding	horizontal partitioning
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	yes	none	yes	Source-replica replication
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods		no		no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration	Immediate Consistency READ-COMMITTED or SERIALIZED	Immediate Consistency	Immediate Consistency
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	no manual creation possible, using inversions based on multi-value capability	yes	yes
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	Atomic execution of specific operations	ACID Optimistic locking for transactions; no isolation for bulk loads	ACID	ACID
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes	yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes	yes	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes	no		yes
User concepts Access control	LDAP bind authentication	no	Access rights for users, groups and roles according to SQL-standard	fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

Share this page