DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Hazelcast vs. Transwarp KunDB vs. Warp 10

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Hazelcast vs. Transwarp KunDB vs. Warp 10

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	Hazelcast  Xexclude from comparison	Transwarp KunDB  Xexclude from comparison	Warp 10  Xexclude from comparison
	This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.
Description	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	A widely adopted in-memory data grid	OLTP DBMS based on a distributed architecture and highly compatible with MySQL and Oracle	TimeSeries DBMS specialized on timestamped geo data based on LevelDB or HBase
Primary database model	Document store Key-value store	Key-value store	Relational DBMS	Time Series DBMS
Secondary database models		Document store JSON support with IMDG 3.12
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart		Score 5.46 Rank #61   Overall #7   Key-value stores	Score 0.14 Rank #341   Overall #149   Relational DBMS	Score 0.14 Rank #344   Overall #32   Time Series DBMS
Website	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	hazelcast.com	www.transwarp.cn/­en/­product/­kundb	www.warp10.io
Technical documentation		hazelcast.org/­imdg/­docs		www.warp10.io/­content/­02_Getting_started
Developer	Atos Convergence Creators	Hazelcast	Transwarp	SenX
Initial release	2016	2008		2015
Current release	1703	5.3.6, November 2023
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	Open Source Apache Version 2; commercial licenses available	commercial	Open Source Apache License 2.0
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Java	Java		Java
Server operating systems	Linux	All OS with a Java VM		Linux OS X Windows
Data scheme	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	schema-free	yes	schema-free
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	optional	yes	yes	yes
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	yes	yes the object must implement a serialization strategy		no
Secondary indexes	yes	yes	yes	no
SQL Support of SQL	no	SQL-like query language	yes	no
APIs and other access methods	LDAP	JCache JPA Memcached protocol RESTful HTTP API		HTTP API Jupyter WebSocket
Supported programming languages	All languages with LDAP bindings	.Net C# C++ Clojure Go Java JavaScript (Node.js) Python Scala
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	yes Event Listeners, Executor Services	yes	yes WarpScript
Triggers	yes	yes Events	yes	no
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding cell division	Sharding	horizontal partitioning	Sharding based on HBase
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	yes	yes Replicated Map		selectable replication factor based on HBase
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods		yes	no	no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency selectable by user Raft Consensus Algorithm	Immediate Consistency	Immediate Consistency based on HBase
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	no	yes	no
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	Atomic execution of specific operations	one or two-phase-commit; repeatable reads; read commited	ACID	no
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes	yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes	yes	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes	yes		yes
User concepts Access control	LDAP bind authentication	Role-based access control	yes	Mandatory use of cryptographic tokens, containing fine-grained authorizations
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Atos Standard Common Repository	Hazelcast	Transwarp KunDB	Warp 10
Recent citations in the news	Infographic: What makes a Mobile Operator's setup future proof? 10 February 2024, Atos provided by Google News	Hazelcast appoints Anthony Griffin as Chief Architect - 11 June 2024, Enterprise Times Hazelcast Weaves Wider Logic Threads Through The Data Fabric 7 March 2024, Forbes Hazelcast 5.4 real time data processing platform boosts AI and consistency 17 April 2024, VentureBeat Hazelcast Showcases Real-Time Data Platform at 2024 Gartner Summit 15 May 2024, Datanami Real-Time Data Platform Hazelcast Introduces New Chief Technology Officer Adrian Soars 7 November 2023, Finovate provided by Google News		Time Series Databases Software market latest trends, CAGR, and forecast till 2026 | eSherpa Market Reports 13 April 2020, openPR provided by Google News

Share this page