DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Blueflood vs. Teradata vs. VelocityDB

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Blueflood vs. Teradata vs. VelocityDB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	Blueflood  Xexclude from comparison	Teradata  Xexclude from comparison	VelocityDB  Xexclude from comparison
	This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.
Description	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	Scalable TimeSeries DBMS based on Cassandra	A hybrid cloud data analytics software platform (Teradata Vantage)	A .NET Object Database that can be embedded/distributed and extended to a graph data model (VelocityGraph)
Primary database model	Document store Key-value store	Time Series DBMS	Relational DBMS	Graph DBMS Object oriented DBMS
Secondary database models			Document store Graph DBMS Spatial DBMS Time Series DBMS
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart		Score 0.13 Rank #346   Overall #33   Time Series DBMS	Score 44.87 Rank #22   Overall #15   Relational DBMS	Score 0.11 Rank #354   Overall #37   Graph DBMS #15   Object oriented DBMS
Website	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	blueflood.io	www.teradata.com	velocitydb.com
Technical documentation		github.com/­rax-maas/­blueflood/­wiki	docs.teradata.com	velocitydb.com/­UserGuide
Developer	Atos Convergence Creators	Rackspace	Teradata	VelocityDB Inc
Initial release	2016	2013	1984	2011
Current release	1703		Teradata Vantage 1.0 MU2, January 2019	7.x
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	Open Source Apache 2.0	commercial	commercial
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Java	Java		C#
Server operating systems	Linux	Linux OS X	hosted Linux	Any that supports .NET
Data scheme	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	predefined scheme	yes	yes
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	optional	yes	yes	yes
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	yes	no	yes	no
Secondary indexes	yes	no	yes Join-index to prejoin tables, aggregate index, sparse index, hash index	yes
SQL Support of SQL	no	no	yes SQL 2016 + extensions	no
APIs and other access methods	LDAP	HTTP REST	.NET Client API HTTP REST JDBC JMS Adapter ODBC OLE DB	.Net
Supported programming languages	All languages with LDAP bindings		C C++ Cobol Java (JDBC-ODBC) Perl PL/1 Python R Ruby	.Net
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	no	yes UDFs, stored procedures, table functions in parallel	no
Triggers	yes	no	yes	Callbacks are triggered when data changes
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding cell division	Sharding based on Cassandra	Sharding Hashing	Sharding
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	yes	selectable replication factor based on Cassandra	Multi-source replication Source-replica replication
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods		no	no	no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration	Eventual Consistency based on Cassandra Immediate Consistency based on Cassandra	Immediate Consistency	Immediate Consistency
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	no	yes	no
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	Atomic execution of specific operations	no	ACID	ACID
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes	yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes	yes	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes	no	yes	yes
User concepts Access control	LDAP bind authentication	no	fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard	Based on Windows Authentication
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Atos Standard Common Repository	Blueflood	Teradata	VelocityDB
DB-Engines blog posts			Teradata is the most popular data warehouse DBMS 2 April 2013, Paul Andlinger show all
Recent citations in the news		Real-Time Performance and Health Monitoring Using Netdata 2 September 2019, CNX Software provided by Google News	Teradata Co. (NYSE:TDC) Given Average Rating of “Hold” by Analysts 16 June 2024, Defense World TERADATA ALERT: Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. Announces that a Class Action Lawsuit Has Been Filed Against ... 15 June 2024, GlobeNewswire SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Pomerantz Law Firm Reminds Shareholders with Losses on their Investment in Teradata ... 15 June 2024, PR Newswire Teradata Stock: Much More Enticing Now Than Last Year, But Uncertainty Lingers (NYSE:TDC) 14 June 2024, Seeking Alpha Is There Now An Opportunity In Teradata Corporation (NYSE:TDC)? 11 June 2024, Simply Wall St provided by Google News

Share this page