DBMS > Apache Phoenix vs. Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Badger vs. JaguarDB

System Properties Comparison Apache Phoenix vs. Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Badger vs. JaguarDB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Apache Phoenix  Xexclude from comparison	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	Badger  Xexclude from comparison	JaguarDB  Xexclude from comparison
		This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.
Description	A scale-out RDBMS with evolutionary schema built on Apache HBase	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	An embeddable, persistent, simple and fast Key-Value Store, written purely in Go.	Performant, highly scalable DBMS for AI and IoT applications
Primary database model	Relational DBMS	Document store Key-value store	Key-value store	Key-value store Vector DBMS
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart	Score 2.06 Rank #123   Overall #58   Relational DBMS		Score 0.22 Rank #320   Overall #47   Key-value stores	Score 0.06 Rank #381   Overall #59   Key-value stores #13   Vector DBMS
Website	phoenix.apache.org	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	github.com/­dgraph-io/­badger	www.jaguardb.com
Technical documentation	phoenix.apache.org		godoc.org/­github.com/­dgraph-io/­badger	www.jaguardb.com/­support.html
Developer	Apache Software Foundation	Atos Convergence Creators	DGraph Labs	DataJaguar, Inc.
Initial release	2014	2016	2017	2015
Current release	5.0-HBase2, July 2018 and 4.15-HBase1, December 2019	1703		3.3 July 2023
License Commercial or Open Source	Open Source Apache Version 2.0	commercial	Open Source Apache 2.0	Open Source GPL V3.0
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Java	Java	Go	C++ the server part. Clients available in other languages
Server operating systems	Linux Unix Windows	Linux	BSD Linux OS X Solaris Windows	Linux
Data scheme	yes late-bound, schema-on-read capabilities	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	schema-free	yes
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	yes	optional	no	yes
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	no	yes	no	no
Secondary indexes	yes	yes	no	yes
SQL Support of SQL	yes	no	no	A subset of ANSI SQL is implemented but no views, foreign keys, triggers
APIs and other access methods	JDBC	LDAP		JDBC ODBC
Supported programming languages	C C# C++ Go Groovy Java PHP Python Scala	All languages with LDAP bindings	Go	C C++ Go Java JavaScript (Node.js) PHP Python Ruby Scala
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	user defined functions	no	no	no
Triggers	no	yes	no	no
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding	Sharding cell division	none	Sharding
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	Multi-source replication Source-replica replication	yes	none	Multi-source replication
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods	Hadoop integration		no	no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration	none	Eventual Consistency
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	no	no	no
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	ACID	Atomic execution of specific operations	no	no
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes	yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes	yes	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes	yes	no	no
User concepts Access control	Access Control Lists (using HBase ACL) for RBAC, integration with Apache Ranger for RBAC & ABAC, multi-tenancy	LDAP bind authentication	no	rights management via user accounts
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Apache Phoenix	Atos Standard Common Repository	Badger	JaguarDB
DB-Engines blog posts	Cloudera's HBase PaaS offering now supports Complex Transactions 11 August 2021,  Krishna Maheshwari (sponsor)  show all
Recent citations in the news	Supercharge SQL on Your Data in Apache HBase with Apache Phoenix | Amazon Web Services 2 June 2016, AWS Blog Bridge the SQL-NoSQL gap with Apache Phoenix 4 February 2016, InfoWorld Apache Calcite, FreeMarker, Gora, Phoenix, and Solr updated 27 March 2017, SDTimes.com Azure HDInsight Analytics Platform Now Supports Apache Hadoop 3.0 18 April 2019, eWeek Deep dive into Azure HDInsight 4.0 25 September 2018, azure.microsoft.com provided by Google News	Infographic: What makes a Mobile Operator's setup future proof? 10 February 2024, Atos provided by Google News

Share this page