DBMS > Amazon SimpleDB vs. Atos Standard Common Repository vs. BigObject vs. Transwarp KunDB

System Properties Comparison Amazon SimpleDB vs. Atos Standard Common Repository vs. BigObject vs. Transwarp KunDB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Amazon SimpleDB  Xexclude from comparison	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	BigObject  Xexclude from comparison	Transwarp KunDB  Xexclude from comparison
		This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.
Description	Hosted simple database service by Amazon, with the data stored in the Amazon Cloud. There is an unrelated product called SimpleDB developed by Edward Sciore	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	Analytic DBMS for real-time computations and queries	OLTP DBMS based on a distributed architecture and highly compatible with MySQL and Oracle
Primary database model	Key-value store	Document store Key-value store	Relational DBMS a hierachical model (tree) can be imposed	Relational DBMS
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart	Score 1.88 Rank #133   Overall #23   Key-value stores		Score 0.19 Rank #329   Overall #146   Relational DBMS	Score 0.14 Rank #341   Overall #149   Relational DBMS
Website	aws.amazon.com/­simpledb	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	bigobject.io	www.transwarp.cn/­en/­product/­kundb
Technical documentation	docs.aws.amazon.com/­simpledb		docs.bigobject.io
Developer	Amazon	Atos Convergence Creators	BigObject, Inc.	Transwarp
Initial release	2007	2016	2015
Current release		1703
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	commercial	commercial free community edition available	commercial
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	yes	no	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language		Java
Server operating systems	hosted	Linux	Linux distributed as a docker-image OS X distributed as a docker-image (boot2docker) Windows distributed as a docker-image (boot2docker)
Data scheme	schema-free	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	yes	yes
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	no	optional	yes	yes
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.		yes	no
Secondary indexes	yes All columns are indexed automatically	yes	yes	yes
SQL Support of SQL	no	no	SQL-like DML and DDL statements	yes
APIs and other access methods	RESTful HTTP API	LDAP	fluentd ODBC RESTful HTTP API
Supported programming languages	.Net C C++ Erlang Java PHP Python Ruby Scala	All languages with LDAP bindings
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	no	Lua	yes
Triggers	no	yes	no	yes
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	none Sharding must be implemented in the application	Sharding cell division	none	horizontal partitioning
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	yes	yes	none
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods	no		no	no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Eventual Consistency Immediate Consistency can be specified for read operations	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration	none	Immediate Consistency
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	no	yes automatically between fact table and dimension tables	yes
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	no Concurrent data updates can be detected by the application	Atomic execution of specific operations	no	ACID
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes	yes Read/write lock on objects (tables, trees)	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes	yes	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.		yes	yes
User concepts Access control	Access rights for users and roles can be defined via the AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM)	LDAP bind authentication	no	yes
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Amazon SimpleDB	Atos Standard Common Repository	BigObject	Transwarp KunDB
DB-Engines blog posts	The popularity of cloud-based DBMSs has increased tenfold in four years 7 February 2017, Matthias Gelbmann Amazon - the rising star in the DBMS market 3 August 2015, Matthias Gelbmann show all
Recent citations in the news	A Place for Everything – Amazon SimpleDB | AWS News Blog 14 December 2007, AWS Blog Amazon DynamoDB Serves Trillions Of Requests Per Month While Counterpart SimpleDB Is No Longer A Listed ... 12 November 2013, TechCrunch Amazon SimpleDB Management in Eclipse | AWS News Blog 22 July 2009, AWS Blog Good Advice on Keeping Your Database Simple and Fast. 25 March 2009, All Things Distributed Amazon Goes Back to the Future With 'NoSQL' Database 19 January 2012, WIRED provided by Google News

Share this page