DBMS > Altibase vs. Amazon Redshift vs. AnzoGraph DB vs. atoti vs. CockroachDB

System Properties Comparison Altibase vs. Amazon Redshift vs. AnzoGraph DB vs. atoti vs. CockroachDB

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

An enterprise grade, high-performance RDBMS

Large scale data warehouse service for use with business intelligence tools

Scalable graph database built for online analytics and data harmonization with MPP scaling, high-performance analytical algorithms and reasoning, and virtualization

An in-memory DBMS combining transactional and analytical processing to handle the aggregation of ever-changing data.

CockroachDB is a distributed database architected for modern cloud applications. It is wire compatible with PostgreSQL and backed by a Key-Value Store, which is either RocksDB or a purpose-built derivative, called Pebble.

Primary database model

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	1.07
Rank	#186	Overall
	#87	Relational DBMS

Score	17.94
Rank	#34	Overall
	#21	Relational DBMS

Score	0.23
Rank	#307	Overall
	#24	Graph DBMS
	#13	RDF stores

Score	0.56
Rank	#245	Overall
	#10	Object oriented DBMS

Score	6.15
Rank	#55	Overall
	#33	Relational DBMS

Website

altibase.com

aws.amazon.com/redshift

cambridgesemantics.com/anzograph

atoti.io

www.cockroachlabs.com

Technical documentation

github.com/ALTIBASE/Documents/tree/master/Manuals

docs.aws.amazon.com/redshift

docs.cambridgesemantics.com/anzograph/userdoc/home.htm

docs.atoti.io

www.cockroachlabs.com/docs

Developer

Altibase

Amazon (based on PostgreSQL)

Cambridge Semantics

ActiveViam

Cockroach Labs

Initial release

1999

2012

2018

2015

Current release

v7.3, 2023, August 2023

2.3, January 2021

23.1.1, May 2023

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

Open source edition discontinued with March 2023

commercial

free trial version available

commercial

free versions available

Open Source

Apache 2.0, commercial license available

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

yes

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

C++

Java

Server operating systems

AIX
HP-UX
Linux

hosted

Linux

Linux
macOS
Windows

Data scheme

yes

Schema-free and OWL/RDFS-schema support

dynamic schema

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

Secondary indexes

yes

restricted

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

ANSI SQL-92

yes

does not fully support an SQL-standard

SPARQL and SPARQL* as primary query language. Cypher preview.

Multidimensional Expressions (MDX)

yes, wire compatible with PostgreSQL

APIs and other access methods

JDBC
ODBC
Proprietary protocol

JDBC
ODBC

Apache Mule
gRPC
JDBC
Kafka
OData access for BI tools
OpenCypher
RESTful HTTP API
SPARQL

JDBC

Supported programming languages

C
C++
Java

All languages supporting JDBC/ODBC

C++
Java
Python

C#
C++
Clojure
Go
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
PHP
Python
Ruby
Rust

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

stored procedures and stored functions

user defined functions

in Python

user defined functions and aggregates

Python

Triggers

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Sharding

Automatic sharding

Sharding, horizontal partitioning

horizontal partitioning (by key range)

all tables are translated to an ordered KV store and then broken down into 64MB ranges, which are then used as replicas in RAFT

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

yes

Multi-source replication in MPP-Cluster

Multi-source replication using RAFT

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Kerberos/HDFS data loading

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Immediate Consistency in MPP-Cluster

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

informational only, not enforced by the system

not needed in graphs

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

yes, multi-version concurrency control (MVCC)

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

Access rights for users and roles

Role-based access control

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.