DBMS > AgensGraph vs. Amazon Redshift vs. Apache Druid

System Properties Comparison AgensGraph vs. Amazon Redshift vs. Apache Druid

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

Multi-model database supporting relational and graph data models and built upon PostgreSQL

Large scale data warehouse service for use with business intelligence tools

Open-source analytics data store designed for sub-second OLAP queries on high dimensionality and high cardinality data

Primary database model

Graph DBMS
Relational DBMS

Relational DBMS

Relational DBMS
Time Series DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.20
Rank	#321	Overall
	#27	Graph DBMS
	#143	Relational DBMS

Score	17.94
Rank	#34	Overall
	#21	Relational DBMS

Score	3.34
Rank	#88	Overall
	#48	Relational DBMS
	#7	Time Series DBMS

Website

bitnine.net/agensgraph

aws.amazon.com/redshift

druid.apache.org

Technical documentation

bitnine.net/documentation

docs.aws.amazon.com/redshift

druid.apache.org/docs/latest/design

Developer

Bitnine Global Inc.

Amazon (based on PostgreSQL)

Apache Software Foundation and contributors

Initial release

2016

2012

Current release

2.1, December 2018

29.0.1, April 2024

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

Apache License 2.0

commercial

Open Source

Apache license v2

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

yes

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Java

Server operating systems

Linux
OS X
Windows

hosted

Linux
OS X
Unix

Data scheme

depending on used data model

yes

schema-less columns are supported

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

Secondary indexes

yes

restricted

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

yes

does not fully support an SQL-standard

SQL for querying

APIs and other access methods

Cypher Query Language
JDBC

JDBC
ODBC

JDBC
RESTful HTTP/JSON API

Supported programming languages

C
Java
JavaScript
Python

All languages supporting JDBC/ODBC

Clojure
JavaScript
PHP
Python
R
Ruby
Scala

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

yes

user defined functions

in Python

Triggers

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

no, but can be realized using table inheritance

Sharding

manual/auto, time-based

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

Source-replica replication

yes

yes, via HDFS, S3 or other storage engines

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

informational only, not enforced by the system

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

RBAC using LDAP or Druid internals for users and groups for read/write by datasource and system

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.