DBMS > Transbase vs. Transwarp StellarDB vs. VelocityDB vs. YottaDB

System Properties Comparison Transbase vs. Transwarp StellarDB vs. VelocityDB vs. YottaDB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

A resource-optimized, high-performance, universally applicable RDBMS

A distributed graph DBMS built for enterprise-level graph applications

A .NET Object Database that can be embedded/distributed and extended to a graph data model (VelocityGraph)

A fast and solid embedded Key-value store

Primary database model

Relational DBMS

Graph DBMS

Graph DBMS
Object oriented DBMS

Key-value store

Secondary database models

Relational DBMS

using the Octo plugin

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.11
Rank	#341	Overall
	#150	Relational DBMS

Score	0.00
Rank	#383	Overall
	#39	Graph DBMS

Score	0.05
Rank	#358	Overall
	#36	Graph DBMS
	#16	Object oriented DBMS

Score	0.20
Rank	#317	Overall
	#47	Key-value stores

Website

www.transaction.de/en/products/transbase.html

www.transwarp.cn/en/product/stellardb

velocitydb.com

yottadb.com

Technical documentation

www.transaction.de/en/products/transbase/features.html

velocitydb.com/UserGuide

yottadb.com/resources/documentation

Developer

Transaction Software GmbH

Transwarp

VelocityDB Inc

YottaDB, LLC

Initial release

1987

2011

2001

Current release

Transbase 8.3, 2022

7.x

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

free development license

commercial

Open Source

AGPL 3.0

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

C and C++

Server operating systems

FreeBSD
Linux
macOS
Solaris
Windows

Any that supports .NET

Docker
Linux

Data scheme

yes

schema-free

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

yes

SQL-like query language

by using the Octo plugin

APIs and other access methods

ADO.NET
JDBC
ODBC
Proprietary native API

OpenCypher

.Net

PostgreSQL wire protocol

using the Octo plugin
Proprietary protocol

Supported programming languages

C
C#
C++
Java
JavaScript
Kotlin
Objective-C
PHP
Python

.Net

C
Go
JavaScript (Node.js)
Lua
M
Perl
Python
Rust

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

yes

Triggers

yes

Callbacks are triggered when data changes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

horizontal partitioning

Sharding

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

Source-replica replication

yes

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

yes

ACID

optimistic locking

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

yes

Based on Windows Authentication

Users and groups based on OS-security mechanisms

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

Share this page