DBMS > OpenQM vs. OrigoDB vs. Teradata vs. YDB

System Properties Comparison OpenQM vs. OrigoDB vs. Teradata vs. YDB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

QpenQM is a high-performance, self-tuning, multi-value DBMS

A fully ACID in-memory object graph database

A hybrid cloud data analytics software platform (Teradata Vantage)

A distributed fault-tolerant database service, with high availability, scalability, immediate consistency and ACID transactions and providing an Amazon DynamoDB compatible API

Primary database model

Multivalue DBMS

Document store
Object oriented DBMS

Relational DBMS

Document store
Relational DBMS

Secondary database models

Document store
Graph DBMS
Spatial DBMS
Time Series DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.33
Rank	#286	Overall
	#10	Multivalue DBMS

Score	0.03
Rank	#378	Overall
	#51	Document stores
	#18	Object oriented DBMS

Score	47.84
Rank	#21	Overall
	#15	Relational DBMS

Score	0.34
Rank	#285	Overall
	#43	Document stores
	#130	Relational DBMS

Website

www.rocketsoftware.com/products/rocket-multivalue-application-development-platform/rocket-open-qm

origodb.com

www.teradata.com

github.com/ydb-platform/ydb
ydb.tech

Technical documentation

origodb.com/docs

docs.teradata.com

ydb.tech/en/docs

Developer

Rocket Software, originally Martin Phillips

Robert Friberg et al

Teradata

Yandex

Initial release

1993

2009

under the name LiveDB

1984

2019

Current release

3.4-12

Teradata Vantage 1.0 MU2, January 2019

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

GPLv2, extended commercial license available

Open Source

commercial

Open Source

Apache 2.0; commercial license available

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Server operating systems

AIX
FreeBSD
Linux
macOS
Raspberry Pi
Solaris
Windows

Linux
Windows

hosted
Linux

Linux

Data scheme

yes

with some exceptions

yes

Flexible Schema (defined schema, partial schema, schema free)

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

User defined using .NET types and collections

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

can be achieved using .NET

yes

Secondary indexes

yes

Join-index to prejoin tables, aggregate index, sparse index, hash index

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

yes

SQL 2016 + extensions

SQL-like query language (YQL)

APIs and other access methods

.NET Client API
HTTP API
LINQ

.NET Client API
HTTP REST
JDBC
JMS Adapter
ODBC
OLE DB

RESTful HTTP API (DynamoDB compatible)

Supported programming languages

.Net
Basic
C
Java
Objective C
PHP
Python

.Net

C
C++
Cobol
Java (JDBC-ODBC)
Perl
PL/1
Python
R
Ruby

Go
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
PHP
Python

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

yes

UDFs, stored procedures, table functions in parallel

Triggers

yes

Domain Events

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

yes

horizontal partitioning

client side managed; servers are not synchronized

Sharding

Hashing

Sharding

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

yes

Source-replica replication

Multi-source replication
Source-replica replication

Active-passive shard replication

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

depending on model

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

Write ahead log

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

Access rights can be defined down to the item level

Role based authorization

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

Access rights defined for Yandex Cloud users

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

DB-Engines blog posts

Teradata is the most popular data warehouse DBMS
2 April 2013, Paul Andlinger

show all

Recent citations in the news

Connecting Teradata Vantage to Amazon Athena
23 April 2024, AWS Blog

An interview with Teradata CFO Claire Bramley
9 February 2024, McKinsey

Teradata's stock tumbles on flat revenue and soft guidance
12 February 2024, SiliconANGLE News

Teradata Appoints Richard Petley as Chief Revenue Officer
5 April 2024, Business Wire

Teradata Corporation (NYSE:TDC) Q4 2023 Earnings Call Transcript
13 February 2024, Yahoo Finance

provided by Google News

Personal Data Protection Service Initiates Probe into Yandex.Go App’s Data Processing
10 August 2023, Civil Georgia

Data leak from Russian delivery app shows dining habits of the secret police
3 April 2022, The Verge

Russian Court Sues Yandex CEO For LGBT Propaganda Case
3 January 2024, VOI.ID

Yandex code leak: Why hack of ‘Russian Google’s’ ranking factors has spooked the SEO industry
1 February 2023, The Indian Express

Russian secret police data leaked by food delivery app including where they live and what they eat...
4 April 2022, The Sun

provided by Google News

Share this page