DBMS > ObjectBox vs. Sequoiadb vs. SiriDB vs. Teradata

System Properties Comparison ObjectBox vs. Sequoiadb vs. SiriDB vs. Teradata

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

Lightweight, fast on-device database for IoT, Mobile and Embedded devices, persisting and synchronising objects and vectors

NewSQL database with distributed OLTP and SQL

Open Source Time Series DBMS

A hybrid cloud data analytics software platform (Teradata Vantage)

Primary database model

Object oriented DBMS
Vector DBMS

Document store
Relational DBMS

Time Series DBMS

Relational DBMS

Secondary database models

Time Series DBMS

Document store
Graph DBMS
Spatial DBMS
Time Series DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	1.08
Rank	#179	Overall
	#6	Object oriented DBMS
	#9	Vector DBMS

Score	0.42
Rank	#263	Overall
	#41	Document stores
	#121	Relational DBMS

Score	0.00
Rank	#385	Overall
	#40	Time Series DBMS

Score	41.47
Rank	#22	Overall
	#15	Relational DBMS

Website

github.com/objectbox
objectbox.io

www.sequoiadb.com

siridb.com

www.teradata.com

Technical documentation

docs.objectbox.io

www.sequoiadb.com/en/index.php?m=Files&a=index

docs.siridb.com

docs.teradata.com

Developer

ObjectBox Limited

Sequoiadb Ltd.

Cesbit

Teradata

Initial release

2017

2013

2017

1984

Current release

4.0 (May 2024)

Teradata Vantage 1.0 MU2, January 2019

License

Commercial or Open Source

Bindings are released under Apache 2.0

Apache License 2.0

Open Source

Server: AGPL; Client: Apache V2

Open Source

MIT License

commercial

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

C and C++

C++

Server operating systems

Android
Any POSIX system
Docker
iOS
Linux
macOS
QNX
Windows

Linux

hosted
Linux

Data scheme

yes

schema-free

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes, plus "flex" map-like types

yes

oid, date, timestamp, binary, regex

yes

Numeric data

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

Secondary indexes

yes

Join-index to prejoin tables, aggregate index, sparse index, hash index

SQL

Support of SQL

SQL-like query language

yes

SQL 2016 + extensions

APIs and other access methods

Proprietary native API

proprietary protocol using JSON

HTTP API

.NET Client API
HTTP REST
JDBC
JMS Adapter
ODBC
OLE DB

Supported programming languages

C
C++
Dart (Flutter)
Go
Java
Kotlin
Python
Swift

.Net
C++
Java
PHP
Python

C
C++
Go
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
PHP
Python
R

C
C++
Cobol
Java (JDBC-ODBC)
Perl
PL/1
Python
R
Ruby

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

JavaScript

yes

UDFs, stored procedures, table functions in parallel

Triggers

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

none

Sharding

Hashing

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

Data sync between devices allowing occasional connected databases to work completely offline

Source-replica replication

yes

Multi-source replication
Source-replica replication

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Eventual Consistency

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Document is locked during a transaction

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

yes

simple password-based access control

simple rights management via user accounts

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

More information provided by the system vendor

News

MongoDB Realm & Device Sync alternatives – ObjectBox
17 September 2024

Local AI – what it is and why we need it
11 September 2024

First on-device Vector Database (aka Semantic Index) for iOS
24 July 2024

Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) with vector databases: Expanding AI Capabilities
18 June 2024

The on-device Vector Database for Android and Java
29 May 2024

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

DB-Engines blog posts

Teradata is the most popular data warehouse DBMS
2 April 2013, Paul Andlinger

show all

Recent citations in the news

Teradata wants you to think differently about data and innovation – and take inspiration from the likes of Shazam
17 September 2024, ITPro

Teradata: Award-Winning Tech Firm Has Capital Gains Potential At Undervalued Price (NYSE:TDC)
20 September 2024, Seeking Alpha

Teradata’s ClearScape Analytics Enhancements Will Speed up AI Projects & Lower Costs
18 September 2024, insideBIGDATA

Teradata ClearScape Analytics update targets ROI on AI, ML
17 September 2024, TechTarget

Analytics and Data Science News for the Week of September 20; Updates from Firebolt, Qrvey, Teradata & More
20 September 2024, Solutions Review

provided by Google News

Share this page