DBMS > Microsoft SQL Server vs. MySQL vs. Oracle

System Properties Comparison Microsoft SQL Server vs. MySQL vs. Oracle

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

Microsofts flagship relational DBMS

Widely used open source RDBMS

Widely used RDBMS

Primary database model

Relational DBMS

Key/Value like access via memcached API

Relational DBMS

Secondary database models

Document store
Graph DBMS
Spatial DBMS

Document store
Spatial DBMS

Document store
Graph DBMS

with Oracle Spatial and Graph
RDF store

with Oracle Spatial and Graph
Spatial DBMS

with Oracle Spatial and Graph
Vector DBMS

since Oracle 23

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	754.15
Rank	#3	Overall
	#3	Relational DBMS

Score	915.46
Rank	#2	Overall
	#2	Relational DBMS

Score	1220.70
Rank	#1	Overall
	#1	Relational DBMS

Website

www.microsoft.com/en-us/sql-server

www.mysql.com

www.oracle.com/database

Technical documentation

learn.microsoft.com/en-US/sql/sql-server

dev.mysql.com/doc

docs.oracle.com/en/database

Developer

Microsoft

Oracle

since 2010, originally MySQL AB, then Sun

Oracle

Initial release

1989

1995

1980

Current release

SQL Server 2022, November 2022

9.0.0, July 2024

23c, September 2023

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

restricted free version is available

Open Source

GPL version 2. Commercial licenses with extended functionallity are available

commercial

restricted free version is available

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

C++

C and C++

Server operating systems

Linux
Windows

FreeBSD
Linux
OS X
Solaris
Windows

AIX
HP-UX
Linux
OS X
Solaris
Windows
z/OS

Data scheme

yes

Schemaless in JSON and XML columns

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

yes

with proprietary extensions

yes

with proprietary extensions

APIs and other access methods

ADO.NET
JDBC
ODBC
OLE DB
Tabular Data Stream (TDS)

ADO.NET
JDBC
ODBC
Proprietary native API

JDBC
ODBC
ODP.NET
Oracle Call Interface (OCI)

Supported programming languages

C#
C++
Delphi
Go
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
PHP
Python
R
Ruby
Visual Basic

Ada
C
C#
C++
D
Delphi
Eiffel
Erlang
Haskell
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
Objective-C
OCaml
Perl
PHP
Python
Ruby
Scheme
Tcl

C
C#
C++
Clojure
Cobol
Delphi
Eiffel
Erlang
Fortran
Groovy
Haskell
Java
JavaScript
Lisp
Objective C
OCaml
Perl
PHP
Python
R
Ruby
Scala
Tcl
Visual Basic

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

Transact SQL, .NET languages, R, Python and (with SQL Server 2019) Java

yes

proprietary syntax

PL/SQL

also stored procedures in Java possible

Triggers

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

tables can be distributed across several files (horizontal partitioning); sharding through federation

horizontal partitioning, sharding with MySQL Cluster or MySQL Fabric

Sharding, horizontal partitioning

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

yes, but depending on the SQL-Server Edition

Multi-source replication
Source-replica replication

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

can be realized in PL/SQL

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

not for MyISAM storage engine

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

not for MyISAM storage engine

ACID

isolation level can be parameterized

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

table locks or row locks depending on storage engine

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

Version 12c introduced the new option 'Oracle Database In-Memory'

User concepts

Access control

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

Users with fine-grained authorization concept

no user groups or roles

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

DB-Engines blog posts

MySQL is the DBMS of the Year 2019
3 January 2020, Matthias Gelbmann, Paul Andlinger

The struggle for the hegemony in Oracle's database empire
2 May 2017, Paul Andlinger

Microsoft SQL Server is the DBMS of the Year
4 January 2017, Matthias Gelbmann, Paul Andlinger

show all

MySQL is the DBMS of the Year 2019
3 January 2020, Matthias Gelbmann, Paul Andlinger

MariaDB strengthens its position in the open source RDBMS market
5 April 2018, Matthias Gelbmann

The struggle for the hegemony in Oracle's database empire
2 May 2017, Paul Andlinger

show all

DB-Engines shares Q1 2025 database industry rankings and top climbers: Snowflake and PostgreSQL trending
1 May 2025, DB-Engines

MySQL is the DBMS of the Year 2019
3 January 2020, Matthias Gelbmann, Paul Andlinger

The struggle for the hegemony in Oracle's database empire
2 May 2017, Paul Andlinger

show all

Recent citations in the news

New Azure Arc Tool Speeds Up SQL Server Migration with Less Downtime
31 July 2025, Petri IT Knowledgebase

Accelerate SQL Server Migration to Azure with Azure Arc
17 July 2025, Microsoft

Microsoft Build: SQL Server 2025 Is (Almost) Here
19 May 2025, Redmondmag.com

Microsoft Patches 130 Vulnerabilities, Including Critical Flaws in SPNEGO and SQL Server
9 July 2025, The Hacker News

Microsoft SQL Server 0-Day Vulnerability Exposes Sensitive Data Over Network
9 July 2025, CyberSecurityNews

provided by Google News

"Serious" MySQL bug celebrates 20 years unfixed - another reason to switch to PostgreSQL?
24 June 2025, devclass

Implement row-level security in Amazon Aurora MySQL and Amazon RDS for MySQL
16 June 2025, Amazon Web Services

Build global MySQL apps using Cloudflare Workers and Hyperdrive
8 April 2025, The Cloudflare Blog

PostgreSQL vs. MySQL in 2025: Choosing the Best Database for Your Backend
20 February 2025, nucamp.co

Top 6 MySQL Database Management Struggles for Laravel Developers (And Smart Fixes)
30 June 2025, Laravel News

provided by Google News

Federal Bank improves development by 3X with Oracle APEX and Autonomous Database
30 July 2025, Oracle

Oracle Database@AWS Now Generally Available
8 July 2025, Oracle

Oracle Supports White House’s Vision for Healthcare Data Interoperability
30 July 2025, Oracle

POSCO Enhances Global Business Agility with Oracle Autonomous Database
31 July 2025, Oracle

Introducing Oracle Database@AWS for simplified Oracle Exadata migrations to the AWS Cloud | Amazon Web Services
8 July 2025, Amazon Web Services

provided by Google News

Share this page