DBMS > atoti vs. Infobright vs. OushuDB vs. Teradata

System Properties Comparison atoti vs. Infobright vs. OushuDB vs. Teradata

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

An in-memory DBMS combining transactional and analytical processing to handle the aggregation of ever-changing data.

High performant column-oriented DBMS for analytic workloads using MySQL or PostgreSQL as a frontend

A data warehouse powered by Apache HAWQ supporting descriptive analysis and advanced machine learning

A hybrid cloud data analytics software platform (Teradata Vantage)

Primary database model

Object oriented DBMS

Relational DBMS

Secondary database models

Document store
Graph DBMS
Spatial DBMS
Time Series DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.56
Rank	#245	Overall
	#10	Object oriented DBMS

Score	0.96
Rank	#194	Overall
	#91	Relational DBMS

Score	0.04
Rank	#363	Overall
	#154	Relational DBMS

Score	45.33
Rank	#21	Overall
	#15	Relational DBMS

Website

atoti.io

ignitetech.com/softwarelibrary/infobrightdb

www.oushu.com/product/oushuDB

www.teradata.com

Technical documentation

docs.atoti.io

www.oushu.com/documentation

docs.teradata.com

Developer

ActiveViam

Ignite Technologies Inc.; formerly InfoBright Inc.

Oushu

Teradata

Initial release

2005

1984

Current release

4.0.1, August 2020

Teradata Vantage 1.0 MU2, January 2019

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

free versions available

commercial

The open source (GPLv2) version did not support inserts/updates/deletes and was discontinued with July 2016

commercial

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Java

Server operating systems

Linux
Windows

Linux

hosted
Linux

Data scheme

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

Secondary indexes

Knowledge Grid Technology used instead

yes

Join-index to prejoin tables, aggregate index, sparse index, hash index

SQL

Support of SQL

Multidimensional Expressions (MDX)

yes

Full-featured ANSI SQL support

yes

SQL 2016 + extensions

APIs and other access methods

ADO.NET
JDBC
ODBC

JDBC
ODBC

.NET Client API
HTTP REST
JDBC
JMS Adapter
ODBC
OLE DB

Supported programming languages

.Net
C
C#
C++
D
Eiffel
Erlang
Haskell
Java
Objective-C
OCaml
Perl
PHP
Python
Ruby
Scheme
Tcl

C
C++

C
C++
Cobol
Java (JDBC-ODBC)
Perl
PL/1
Python
R
Ruby

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

Python

yes

UDFs, stored procedures, table functions in parallel

Triggers

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Sharding, horizontal partitioning

none

yes

Sharding

Hashing

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

Source-replica replication

Multi-source replication
Source-replica replication

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Hadoop integration

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes, multi-version concurrency control (MVCC)

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

exploiting MySQL or PostgreSQL frontend capabilities

Kerberos, SSL and role based access

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

DB-Engines blog posts

Teradata is the most popular data warehouse DBMS
2 April 2013, Paul Andlinger

show all

Recent citations in the news

Best use of cloud: ActiveViam
28 November 2023, Risk.net

FRTB product of the year: ActiveViam
28 November 2023, Risk.net

provided by Google News

Ignite Buys Database Vendor Infobright
2 May 2017, Datanami

provided by Google News

China's answer to Snowflake is shaping as data demands upgrade
8 September 2021, PingWest

provided by Google News

Should You Be Excited About Teradata Corporation's (NYSE:TDC) 78% Return On Equity?
27 May 2024, Simply Wall St

Commerce Bank Raises Stake in Teradata Co. (NYSE:TDC)
27 May 2024, Defense World

Teradata takes plunge into lakehouse waters, but not everyone is convinced
23 May 2024, The Register

Commerce Bank Increases Stock Position in Teradata Co. (NYSE:TDC)
27 May 2024, MarketBeat

Teradata Increases Sales but Misses Revenue Estimate
26 May 2024, AOL

provided by Google News

Share this page