DBMS > IBM Db2 warehouse vs. Quasardb vs. Riak KV vs. Transwarp ArgoDB

System Properties Comparison IBM Db2 warehouse vs. Quasardb vs. Riak KV vs. Transwarp ArgoDB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

Cloud-based data warehousing service

Distributed, high-performance timeseries database

Distributed, fault tolerant key-value store

Distributed Analytical Database to replace Hadoop+MPP hybrid architecture

Primary database model

Relational DBMS

Time Series DBMS

Key-value store

with links between data sets and object tags for the creation of secondary indexes

Relational DBMS

Secondary database models

Search engine

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	1.26
Rank	#162	Overall
	#73	Relational DBMS

Score	0.13
Rank	#332	Overall
	#28	Time Series DBMS

Score	3.84
Rank	#76	Overall
	#9	Key-value stores

Score	0.04
Rank	#361	Overall
	#153	Relational DBMS

Website

www.ibm.com/products/db2/warehouse

quasar.ai

www.transwarp.cn/en/product/argodb

Technical documentation

doc.quasar.ai/master

www.tiot.jp/riak-docs/riak/kv/latest

docs.transwarp.cn/#/documents-support/docs?category=ARGODB

Developer

IBM

quasardb

OpenSource, formerly Basho Technologies

Transwarp

Initial release

2014

2009

Current release

3.14.1, January 2024

3.2.0, December 2022

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

Free community edition, Non-profit organizations and non-commercial usage are eligible for free licenses

Open Source

Apache version 2, commercial enterprise edition

commercial

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

yes

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

C++

Erlang

Server operating systems

hosted

BSD
Linux
OS X
Windows

Linux
OS X

Data scheme

yes

schema-free

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

integer and binary

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

Import/export of XML data possible

Secondary indexes

yes

with tags

restricted

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

yes

SQL-like query language

yes

APIs and other access methods

.NET Client API
JDBC
ODBC
OLE DB

HTTP API

HTTP API
Native Erlang Interface

Supported programming languages

Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
Perl
PHP
Python
R
Ruby

.Net
C
C#
C++
Go
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
PHP
Python
R

unofficial client library
C#
C++

unofficial client library
Clojure

unofficial client library
Dart

unofficial client library
Erlang
Go

unofficial client library
Groovy

unofficial client library
Haskell

unofficial client library
Java
JavaScript

unofficial client library
Lisp

unofficial client library
Perl

unofficial client library
PHP
Python
Ruby
Scala

unofficial client library
Smalltalk

unofficial client library

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

PL/SQL, SQL PL

Erlang

Triggers

yes

pre-commit hooks and post-commit hooks

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Sharding

consistent hashing

Sharding

no "single point of failure"

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

yes

Source-replica replication with selectable replication factor

selectable replication factor

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

with Hadoop integration

yes

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Eventual Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

links between data sets can be stored

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

by using LevelDB

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

Transient mode

User concepts

Access control

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

Cryptographically strong user authentication and audit trail

yes, using Riak Security

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

A major upgrade to Db2® Warehouse on IBM Cloud®
26 June 2024, IBM

Announcing the deprecation of prior generation Db2 Warehouse plans on AWS
16 October 2023, IBM

Data Mining in Db2 Warehouse: the basics
23 June 2020, Towards Data Science

Top 7 Cloud Data Warehouse Companies
31 May 2023, Datamation

Tackling AI’s data challenges with IBM databases on AWS
14 March 2024, IBM

provided by Google News

NVIDIA to Present Innovations at Hot Chips That Boost Data Center Performance and Energy Efficiency
23 August 2024, NVIDIA Blog

Webb captures a staggering quasar-galaxy merger in the remote universe
5 July 2024, Phys.org

When a Quasar Remote Access Tool Falls Into the Wrong Hands
23 February 2024, darktrace.com

Record quasar is most luminous object in the universe
20 February 2024, EarthSky

Hubble Unexpectedly Finds Double Quasar in Distant Universe
5 April 2023, Science@NASA

provided by Google News

Basho Revamps Riak Open-Source Database
22 September 2023, InformationWeek

Top 8 Best NoSQL Databases in 2024
9 September 2024, AIM

A Critique of Resizable Hash Tables: Riak Core & Random Slicing
26 August 2018, InfoQ.com

Riak NoSQL snapped up by Bet365
12 September 2017, ComputerWeekly.com

If you wagered Bet365 would buy up Basho's remains, you'd be a big winner right now
25 August 2017, The Register

provided by Google News

Share this page