Featured Products: Neo4j SingleStore Milvus Datastax Astra RaimaDB

DBMS > Heroic vs. OrigoDB vs. Riak KV vs. SQL.JS

System Properties Comparison Heroic vs. OrigoDB vs. Riak KV vs. SQL.JS

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

Time Series DBMS built at Spotify based on Cassandra or Google Cloud Bigtable, and ElasticSearch

A fully ACID in-memory object graph database

Distributed, fault tolerant key-value store

Port of SQLite to JavaScript

Primary database model

Time Series DBMS

Document store
Object oriented DBMS

Key-value store

with links between data sets and object tags for the creation of secondary indexes

Relational DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.13
Rank	#335	Overall
	#29	Time Series DBMS

Score	0.00
Rank	#385	Overall
	#54	Document stores
	#21	Object oriented DBMS

Score	3.84
Rank	#76	Overall
	#9	Key-value stores

Score	0.53
Rank	#246	Overall
	#115	Relational DBMS

Website

github.com/spotify/heroic

Technical documentation

spotify.github.io/heroic

origodb.com/docs

www.tiot.jp/riak-docs/riak/kv/latest

sql.js.org/documentation/index.html

Developer

Spotify

Robert Friberg et al

OpenSource, formerly Basho Technologies

Alon Zakai

enhancements implemented by others

Initial release

2014

2009

under the name LiveDB

2009

2012

Current release

3.2.0, December 2022

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

Apache 2.0

Open Source

Open Source

Apache version 2, commercial enterprise edition

Open Source

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

no

no

no

no

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Java

C#

Erlang

JavaScript

Server operating systems

Linux
Windows

Linux
OS X

server-less, requires a JavaScript environment (browser, Node.js)

Data scheme

schema-free

yes

schema-free

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

User defined using .NET types and collections

no

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

no

no

can be achieved using .NET

no

no

Secondary indexes

yes

via Elasticsearch

yes

restricted

SQL

Support of SQL

no

no

no

yes

SQL-92 is not fully supported

APIs and other access methods

HQL (Heroic Query Language, a JSON-based language)
HTTP API

.NET Client API
HTTP API
LINQ

HTTP API
Native Erlang Interface

JavaScript API

Supported programming languages

.Net

C

unofficial client library
C#
C++

unofficial client library
Clojure

unofficial client library
Dart

unofficial client library
Erlang
Go

unofficial client library
Groovy

unofficial client library
Haskell

unofficial client library
Java
JavaScript

unofficial client library
Lisp

unofficial client library
Perl

unofficial client library
PHP
Python
Ruby
Scala

unofficial client library
Smalltalk

unofficial client library

JavaScript

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

no

yes

Erlang

no

Triggers

no

yes

Domain Events

yes

pre-commit hooks and post-commit hooks

no

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Sharding

horizontal partitioning

client side managed; servers are not synchronized

Sharding

no "single point of failure"

none

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

yes

Source-replica replication

selectable replication factor

none

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

no

no

yes

no

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Eventual Consistency
Immediate Consistency

Eventual Consistency

none

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

no

depending on model

no

links between data sets can be stored

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

no

ACID

no

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

yes

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

yes

Write ahead log

yes

no

except by serializing a db to a file

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

no

yes

yes

User concepts

Access control

Role based authorization

yes, using Riak Security

no

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

DB-Engines blog posts

New kids on the block: database management systems implemented in JavaScript
1 December 2014, Matthias Gelbmann

Recent citations in the news

Basho Revamps Riak Open-Source Database
22 September 2023, InformationWeek

Top 8 Best NoSQL Databases in 2024
9 September 2024, AIM

A Critique of Resizable Hash Tables: Riak Core & Random Slicing
26 August 2018, InfoQ.com

Riak NoSQL snapped up by Bet365
12 September 2017, ComputerWeekly.com

If you wagered Bet365 would buy up Basho's remains, you'd be a big winner right now
25 August 2017, The Register

provided by Google News

9 Best JavaScript and TypeScript ORMs for 2024
22 March 2023, SitePoint

Running PostgreSQL Inside Your Browser
8 September 2022, iProgrammer

SQLite On The Web: Absurd-sql
24 August 2021, Hackaday

React Native for beginners
31 October 2018, hackernoon.com

10 Low-Code Rules for Serious Coders
21 November 2022, Embedded Computing Design

provided by Google News

Share this page

Featured Products

Present your product here