DBMS > Hawkular Metrics vs. Kingbase vs. OrigoDB vs. SAP Advantage Database Server

System Properties Comparison Hawkular Metrics vs. Kingbase vs. OrigoDB vs. SAP Advantage Database Server

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Hawkular Metrics  Xexclude from comparison	Kingbase  Xexclude from comparison	OrigoDB  Xexclude from comparison	SAP Advantage Database Server former name: Sybase ADS  Xexclude from comparison
				SAP Advantage Database Server seems to be discontinued. Therefore it is excluded from the DB-Engines Ranking.
Description	Hawkular metrics is the metric storage of the Red Hat sponsored Hawkular monitoring system. It is based on Cassandra.	An enterprise-class RDBMS compatible with PostgreSQL and Oracle and widely used in China.	A fully ACID in-memory object graph database	Low-cost RDBMS with access to ISAM and FoxPro data structures
Primary database model	Time Series DBMS	Relational DBMS	Document store Object oriented DBMS	Relational DBMS
Secondary database models		Document store Spatial DBMS
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart	Score 0.08 Rank #366   Overall #39   Time Series DBMS	Score 0.50 Rank #257   Overall #119   Relational DBMS	Score 0.06 Rank #380   Overall #50   Document stores #18   Object oriented DBMS
Website	www.hawkular.org	www.kingbase.com.cn	origodb.com	www.sap.com/products/advantage-database-server.html
Technical documentation	www.hawkular.org/­hawkular-metrics/­docs/­user-guide		origodb.com/­docs
Developer	Community supported by Red Hat	BeiJing KINGBASE Information technologies inc.	Robert Friberg et al	Sybase, SAP
Initial release	2014	1999	2009 under the name LiveDB	1993
Current release		V8.0, August 2021
License Commercial or Open Source	Open Source Apache 2.0	commercial	Open Source	commercial
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Java	C and Java	C#
Server operating systems	Linux OS X Windows	Linux Windows	Linux Windows	Linux Windows
Data scheme	schema-free	yes	yes	yes
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	yes	yes	User defined using .NET types and collections	yes
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	no	yes	no can be achieved using .NET	no
Secondary indexes	no	yes	yes	yes
SQL Support of SQL	no	Standard with numerous extensions	no	yes
APIs and other access methods	HTTP REST	ADO.NET gokb JDBC kdbndp ODBC PDI PDO Pro*C psycopg2 QT	.NET Client API HTTP API LINQ	.NET Client API ADO.NET JDBC ODBC OLE DB
Supported programming languages	Go Java Python Ruby	.Net C C++ Go Java JavaScript (Node.js) Perl PHP Python	.Net	Delphi Perl PHP
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	user defined functions	yes	yes
Triggers	yes via Hawkular Alerting	yes	yes Domain Events	yes
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding based on Cassandra	horizontal partitioning (by range, list and hash) and vertical partitioning	horizontal partitioning client side managed; servers are not synchronized	none
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	selectable replication factor based on Cassandra	yes	Source-replica replication	Multi-source replication CONFLICT Trigger to resolve replication conflicts Source-replica replication
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods	no	no	no	no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Eventual Consistency based on Cassandra Immediate Consistency based on Cassandra	Immediate Consistency		Immediate Consistency
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	yes	depending on model	yes
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	no	ACID	ACID	ACID
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes	yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes	yes Write ahead log	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	no		yes	no caching of (temporary) tables can be configured
User concepts Access control	no	fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard	Role based authorization	fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Hawkular Metrics	Kingbase	OrigoDB	SAP Advantage Database Server former name: Sybase ADS
Recent citations in the news	Waiting for Red Hat OpenShift 4.0? Too late, 4.1 has already arrived… • DEVCLASS 5 June 2019, DevClass provided by Google News	Made in China 2025 is back, with a new name and a focus on database companies – The China Project 19 December 2022, The China Project Opening preparation - Alekhine defense, Saemisch variation 18 April 2016, Chess.com Backup & Recovery Solutions from China 4 August 2022, Хабр provided by Google News		SAP Announces Q3 2023 Results: Asia Pacific and Japan View 19 October 2023, SAP News provided by Google News

Share this page