DBMS > GBase vs. Hazelcast vs. HugeGraph vs. Warp 10

System Properties Comparison GBase vs. Hazelcast vs. HugeGraph vs. Warp 10

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

Widely used RDBMS in China, including analytical, transactional, distributed transactional, and cloud-native data warehousing.

A widely adopted in-memory data grid

A fast-speed and highly-scalable Graph DBMS

TimeSeries DBMS specialized on timestamped geo data based on LevelDB or HBase

Primary database model

Secondary database models

Document store

JSON support with IMDG 3.12

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	1.07
Rank	#185	Overall
	#86	Relational DBMS

Score	5.97
Rank	#57	Overall
	#6	Key-value stores

Score	0.13
Rank	#336	Overall
	#32	Graph DBMS

Score	0.07
Rank	#349	Overall
	#32	Time Series DBMS

Website

www.gbase.cn

hazelcast.com

github.com/hugegraph
hugegraph.apache.org

www.warp10.io

Technical documentation

hazelcast.org/imdg/docs

hugegraph.apache.org/docs

www.warp10.io/content/02_Getting_started

Developer

General Data Technology Co., Ltd.

Hazelcast

Baidu

SenX

Initial release

2004

2008

2018

2015

Current release

GBase 8a, GBase 8s, GBase 8c

5.3.6, November 2023

0.9

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

Open Source

Apache Version 2; commercial licenses available

Open Source

Apache Version 2.0

Open Source

Apache License 2.0

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

C, Java, Python

Java

Server operating systems

Linux

All OS with a Java VM

Linux
macOS
Unix

Linux
OS X
Windows

Data scheme

yes

schema-free

yes

schema-free

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

the object must implement a serialization strategy

Secondary indexes

yes

also supports composite index and range index

SQL

Support of SQL

Standard with numerous extensions

SQL-like query language

APIs and other access methods

ADO.NET
C API
JDBC
ODBC

JCache
JPA
Memcached protocol
RESTful HTTP API

Java API
RESTful HTTP API
TinkerPop Gremlin

HTTP API
Jupyter
WebSocket

Supported programming languages

.Net
C#
C++
Clojure
Go
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
Python
Scala

Groovy
Java
Python

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

user defined functions

yes

Event Listeners, Executor Services

asynchronous Gremlin script jobs

yes

WarpScript

Triggers

yes

Events

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

horizontal partitioning (by range, list and hash) and vertical partitioning

Sharding

yes

depending on used storage backend, e.g. Cassandra and HBase

Sharding

based on HBase

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

yes

Replicated Map

yes

depending on used storage backend, e.g. Cassandra and HBase

selectable replication factor

based on HBase

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

yes

via hugegraph-spark

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency selectable by user

Raft Consensus Algorithm

Eventual Consistency

Immediate Consistency

based on HBase

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

edges in graph

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

one or two-phase-commit; repeatable reads; read commited

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

yes

Role-based access control

Users, roles and permissions

Mandatory use of cryptographic tokens, containing fine-grained authorizations

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

Hazelcast Weaves Wider Logic Threads Through The Data Fabric
7 March 2024, Forbes

Hazelcast 5.4 real time data processing platform boosts AI and consistency
17 April 2024, VentureBeat

Hazelcast Achieves Record Year with Leading Brands Choosing Its Platform for Application Modernization, AI Initiatives
22 February 2024, Datanami

Research Report on Event Stream Processing Tools Market Size 2024-2030: Supply-Demand Trends, Regional ...
3 May 2024, News Channel Nebraska

Real-Time Data Platform Hazelcast Introduces New Chief Technology Officer Adrian Soars
7 November 2023, Finovate

provided by Google News

Critical Apache HugeGraph Flaw Let Attackers Execute Remote Code
23 April 2024, GBHackers

provided by Google News

Time Series Databases Software Market - A comprehensive study by Key Players | Warp 10, Amazon Timestream ...
6 February 2020, openPR

Launched Just A Year Ago, Open-Source Scality S3 Server Gains Extraordinary Momentum As It Simplifies The Life Of ...
28 June 2017, PR Newswire UK

Time Series Databases Software market latest trends, CAGR, and forecast till 2026 | eSherpa Market Reports
13 April 2020, openPR

Time Series Intelligence Software Market Business Insights, Key Trend Analysis | Google, SAP, Azure Time Series ...
24 April 2024, Amoré

provided by Google News

Share this page