DBMS > EventStoreDB vs. GBase vs. MarkLogic vs. TimesTen

System Properties Comparison EventStoreDB vs. GBase vs. MarkLogic vs. TimesTen

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

Industrial-strength, open-source database solution built from the ground up for event sourcing.

Widely used RDBMS in China, including analytical, transactional, distributed transactional, and cloud-native data warehousing.

Operational and transactional Enterprise NoSQL database

An in-memory SQL relational database that delivers microsecond response and high throughput for OLTP applications. TimesTen can be deployed as a standalone database or as a cache to a backend Oracle database.

Primary database model

Event Store

Relational DBMS

Document store
Native XML DBMS
RDF store

as of version 7
Search engine

Relational DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	1.07
Rank	#181	Overall
	#1	Event Stores

Score	1.11
Rank	#173	Overall
	#78	Relational DBMS

Score	4.15
Rank	#70	Overall
	#11	Document stores
	#1	Native XML DBMS
	#1	RDF stores
	#8	Search engines

Score	1.26
Rank	#164	Overall
	#75	Relational DBMS

Website

www.eventstore.com

www.gbase.cn

www.progress.com/marklogic

www.oracle.com/database/technologies/related/timesten.html

Technical documentation

developers.eventstore.com

www.progress.com/marklogic/documentation

docs.oracle.com/en/database/other-databases/timesten/index.html

Developer

Event Store Limited

General Data Technology Co., Ltd.

MarkLogic Corp.

Oracle

originally founded in HP Labs it was acquired by Oracle in 2005

Initial release

2012

2004

2001

1998

Current release

21.2, February 2021

GBase 8a, GBase 8s, GBase 8c

11.0, December 2022

Release 22.1

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

commercial

restricted free version is available

commercial

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

C, Java, Python

C++

Server operating systems

Linux
Windows

Linux

Linux
OS X
Windows

IBM AIX Power PC 64-bit
Linux arm64
Linux x86-64
Solaris SPARC 64
Solaris SPARC/x86
Solaris x86-64

Data scheme

yes

schema-free

Schema can be enforced

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

Standard with numerous extensions

yes

SQL92

yes

APIs and other access methods

ADO.NET
C API
JDBC
ODBC

Java API
Node.js Client API
ODBC
proprietary Optic API

Proprietary Query API, introduced with version 9
RESTful HTTP API
SPARQL
WebDAV
XDBC
XQuery
XSLT

ODBC
ODP.NET
Oracle Call Interface (OCI)
Pro*C/C++ programming interfaces
SQL and PL/SQL via JDBC

Supported programming languages

C
C#
C++
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
Perl
PHP
Python
Ruby

C
C++
Java
Node.js
PL/SQL
Python

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

user defined functions

yes

via XQuery or JavaScript

PL/SQL

Triggers

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

horizontal partitioning (by range, list and hash) and vertical partitioning

Sharding

none

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

yes

Multi-source replication
Source-replica replication

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

yes

via Hadoop Connector, HDFS Direct Access and in-database MapReduce jobs

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

can act as a resource manager in an XA/JTA transaction

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

by means of logfiles and checkpoints

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes, with Range Indexes

yes

User concepts

Access control

yes

Role-based access control at the document and subdocument levels

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Conferences, events and webinars

more DBMS events

Progress MarkLogic World
Washington DC, 23-25 September 2024

Recent citations in the news

Progress Software announces speaker lineup for MarkLogic World Tour US
18 September 2024, TipRanks

Progress Brings Industry Leaders Together to Share Insights on AI and Data at MarkLogic World Tour US 2024
18 September 2024, Progress Investor Relations

Progress Brings Industry Leaders Together to Share Insights on AI and Data at MarkLogic World Tour US 2024
18 September 2024, StockTitan

Progress Introduces MarkLogic FastTrack, Helping Organizations Harness the Power of Connected Data
23 July 2024, Yahoo Finance

Vantage Closes Wholesale Deal in Santa Clara
30 May 2024, Data Center Knowledge

provided by Google News

Oracle starts peddling Exalytics in-memory appliance
12 March 2012, The Register

SAP S&D Benchmark - The Intel Xeon E7-8800 v3 Review: The POWER8 Killer?
8 May 2015, AnandTech

provided by Google News

Share this page