DBMS > atoti vs. EsgynDB vs. Oracle Berkeley DB vs. Qdrant

System Properties Comparison atoti vs. EsgynDB vs. Oracle Berkeley DB vs. Qdrant

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

An in-memory DBMS combining transactional and analytical processing to handle the aggregation of ever-changing data.

Enterprise-class SQL-on-Hadoop solution, powered by Apache Trafodion

Widely used in-process key-value store

A high-performance vector database with neural network or semantic-based matching

Primary database model

Object oriented DBMS

Relational DBMS

Key-value store

supports sorted and unsorted key sets
Native XML DBMS

in the Oracle Berkeley DB XML version

Vector DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.45
Rank	#253	Overall
	#13	Object oriented DBMS

Score	0.15
Rank	#325	Overall
	#144	Relational DBMS

Score	1.88
Rank	#130	Overall
	#23	Key-value stores
	#3	Native XML DBMS

Score	1.53
Rank	#145	Overall
	#7	Vector DBMS

Website

atoti.io

www.esgyn.cn

www.oracle.com/database/technologies/related/berkeleydb.html

github.com/qdrant/qdrant
qdrant.tech

Technical documentation

docs.atoti.io

docs.oracle.com/cd/E17076_05/html/index.html

qdrant.tech/documentation

Developer

ActiveViam

Esgyn

Oracle

originally developed by Sleepycat, which was acquired by Oracle

Qdrant

Initial release

2015

1994

2021

Current release

18.1.40, May 2020

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

free versions available

commercial

Open Source

commercial license available

Open Source

Apache Version 2.0

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Java

C++, Java

C, Java, C++ (depending on the Berkeley DB edition)

Rust

Server operating systems

Linux

AIX
Android
FreeBSD
iOS
Linux
OS X
Solaris
VxWorks
Windows

Docker
Linux
macOS
Windows

Data scheme

yes

schema-free

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

Numbers, Strings, Geo, Boolean

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

only with the Berkeley DB XML edition

Secondary indexes

yes

Keywords, numberic ranges, geo, full-text

SQL

Support of SQL

Multidimensional Expressions (MDX)

yes

SQL interfaced based on SQLite is available

APIs and other access methods

ADO.NET
JDBC
ODBC

gRPC
OpenAPI 3.0
RESTful HTTP/JSON API

OpenAPI 3.0

Supported programming languages

All languages supporting JDBC/ODBC/ADO.Net

.Net

Figaro is a .Net framework assembly that extends Berkeley DB XML into an embeddable database engine for .NET
others

Third-party libraries to manipulate Berkeley DB files are available for many languages
C
C#
C++
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)

3rd party binding
Perl
Python
Tcl

.Net
Go
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
Python
Rust

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

Python

Java Stored Procedures

Triggers

yes

only for the SQL API

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Sharding, horizontal partitioning

Sharding

none

Sharding

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

Multi-source replication between multi datacenters

Source-replica replication

Collection-level replication

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

yes

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Eventual Consistency, tunable consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes, multi-version concurrency control (MVCC)

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

Key-based authentication

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

Best use of cloud: ActiveViam
28 November 2023, Risk.net

ActiveViam Announces Leadership Succession
4 September 2024, businesswire.com

FRTB product of the year: ActiveViam
28 November 2023, Risk.net

provided by Google News

What is NoSQL (Not Only SQL database)?
28 February 2022, TechTarget

Margo I. Seltzer
18 August 2020, Berkman Klein Center

Database Trends Report: SQL Beats NoSQL, MySQL Most Popular
5 March 2019, ADT Magazine

How to store financial market data for backtesting
26 January 2019, Towards Data Science

A complete beginners guide to installing a Bitcoin Full Node on Linux (2018 Edition)
3 May 2018, hackernoon.com

provided by Google News

Qdrant review: A highly flexible option for vector search
29 July 2024, InfoWorld

Vector database company Qdrant wants RAG to be more cost-effective
2 July 2024, VentureBeat

Open source vector database startup Qdrant raises $28M
23 January 2024, TechCrunch

Qdrant Announces an Industry-First Hybrid Cloud Offering For Enterprise AI Applications
16 April 2024, businesswire.com

Qdrant unveils hybrid vector algorithm for improved RAG
2 July 2024, Blocks & Files

provided by Google News

Share this page