DBMS > DataFS vs. Hyprcubd vs. Ingres vs. Oracle Coherence vs. Warp 10

System Properties Comparison DataFS vs. Hyprcubd vs. Ingres vs. Oracle Coherence vs. Warp 10

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Hyprcubd seems to be discontinued. Therefore it is excluded from the DB-Engines ranking.

Description

All data is stored inside objects which are linked by so-called link attributes. Objects consist of classes which can be extended and de-extended at runtime. Graphs can be defined with a struct.

Serverless Time Series DBMS

Well established RDBMS

Oracles in-memory data grid solution

TimeSeries DBMS specialized on timestamped geo data based on LevelDB or HBase

Primary database model

Secondary database models

Graph DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.06
Rank	#354	Overall
	#15	Object oriented DBMS

Score	4.11
Rank	#81	Overall
	#44	Relational DBMS

Score	1.92
Rank	#130	Overall
	#22	Key-value stores

Score	0.07
Rank	#349	Overall
	#32	Time Series DBMS

Website

newdatabase.com

hyprcubd.com (offline)

www.actian.com/databases/ingres

www.oracle.com/java/coherence

www.warp10.io

Technical documentation

dev.mobiland.com/Overview.xsp

docs.actian.com/ingres

docs.oracle.com/en/middleware/standalone/coherence

www.warp10.io/content/02_Getting_started

Developer

Mobiland AG

Hyprcubd, Inc.

Actian Corporation

Oracle

SenX

Initial release

2018

1974

originally developed at University Berkely in early 1970s

2007

2015

Current release

1.1.263, October 2022

11.2, May 2022

14.1, August 2023

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

Open Source

Apache License 2.0

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

yes

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Java

Server operating systems

Windows

hosted

AIX
HP Open VMS
HP-UX
Linux
Solaris
Windows

All OS with a Java VM

Linux
OS X
Windows

Data scheme

Classes, Structs, and Lists are written in proprietary DataTypeDefinitionLanguage (.dtdl) and Objects consisting of those are written in proprietary DataAccessDefinitionLanguage (.dadl)

yes

schema-free

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

time, int, uint, float, string

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

but tools for importing/exporting data from/to XML-files available

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

SQL-like query language

yes

APIs and other access methods

.NET Client API
Proprietary client DLL
WinRT client

gRPC (https)

.NET Client API
JDBC
ODBC
proprietary protocol (OpenAPI)

JCache
JPA
RESTful HTTP API

HTTP API
Jupyter
WebSocket

Supported programming languages

.Net
C
C#
C++
VB.Net

.Net
C++
Java

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

yes

WarpScript

Triggers

no, except callback-events from server when changes happened

yes

Live Events

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Proprietary Sharding system

horizontal partitioning

Ingres Star to access multiple databases simultaneously

Sharding

based on HBase

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

Ingres Replicator

yes, with selectable consistency level

selectable replication factor

based on HBase

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Eventual Consistency

Immediate Consistency

Eventual Consistency
Immediate Consistency

Immediate Consistency

based on HBase

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

configurable

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

MVCC

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

optionally

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

Windows-Profile

token access

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

authentification to access the cache via certificates or http basic authentication

Mandatory use of cryptographic tokens, containing fine-grained authorizations

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

Postgres pioneer Michael Stonebraker promises to upend the database once more
26 December 2023, The Register

New startup from Postgres creator puts the database at heart of software stack
12 March 2024, TechCrunch

Actian Launches Ingres as a Fully-Managed Cloud Service
24 September 2021, Integration Developers

PostgreSQL now top developer choice ahead of MySQL, according to massive new survey • DEVCLASS
13 June 2023, DevClass

Dr. Michael Stonebraker: A Short History of Database Systems
1 February 2019, The New Stack

provided by Google News

Create custom Event Compression Policies in Enterprise Manager to reduce event noise
21 September 2023, Oracle

Microservices with Major New Coherence and Helidon Releases
9 August 2022, Oracle

Nike achieves scalability and performance with Oracle Coherence & Exadata
20 December 2012, Oracle

New solutions for Oracle WebLogic on Azure Virtual Machines
1 April 2021, Microsoft

GridGain: Product Overview and Analysis
5 June 2019, eWeek

provided by Google News

Time Series Intelligence Software Market Business Insights, Key Trend Analysis | Google, SAP, Azure Time Series ...
24 April 2024, Amoré

provided by Google News

Share this page