DBMS > DataFS vs. Ehcache vs. EsgynDB vs. Immudb vs. Netezza

System Properties Comparison DataFS vs. Ehcache vs. EsgynDB vs. Immudb vs. Netezza

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

All data is stored inside objects which are linked by so-called link attributes. Objects consist of classes which can be extended and de-extended at runtime. Graphs can be defined with a struct.

A widely adopted Java cache with tiered storage options

Enterprise-class SQL-on-Hadoop solution, powered by Apache Trafodion

An open source immutable (append-only) database with cryptographic verification which makes it tamper-resistant and fully auditable.

Data warehouse and analytics appliance part of IBM PureSystems

Primary database model

Secondary database models

Graph DBMS

Relational DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.00
Rank	#386	Overall
	#20	Object oriented DBMS

Score	4.52
Rank	#65	Overall
	#8	Key-value stores

Score	0.15
Rank	#325	Overall
	#145	Relational DBMS

Score	0.31
Rank	#278	Overall
	#39	Key-value stores

Score	6.70
Rank	#52	Overall
	#31	Relational DBMS

Website

newdatabase.com

www.ehcache.org

www.esgyn.cn

github.com/codenotary/immudb
immudb.io

www.ibm.com/products/netezza

Technical documentation

dev.mobiland.com/Overview.xsp

www.ehcache.org/documentation

docs.immudb.io

Developer

Mobiland AG

Terracotta Inc, owned by Software AG

Esgyn

Codenotary

IBM

Initial release

2018

2009

2015

2020

2000

Current release

1.1.263, October 2022

3.10.0, March 2022

1.2.3, April 2022

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

Open Source

Apache Version 2; commercial licenses available

commercial

Open Source

Apache Version 2.0

commercial

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Java

C++, Java

Server operating systems

Windows

All OS with a Java VM

Linux

BSD
Linux
macOS
Solaris
Windows
z/OS

Linux

included in appliance

Data scheme

Classes, Structs, and Lists are written in proprietary DataTypeDefinitionLanguage (.dtdl) and Objects consisting of those are written in proprietary DataAccessDefinitionLanguage (.dadl)

schema-free

yes

schema-free

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

yes

SQL-like syntax

yes

APIs and other access methods

.NET Client API
Proprietary client DLL
WinRT client

JCache

ADO.NET
JDBC
ODBC

gRPC protocol
PostgreSQL wire protocol

JDBC
ODBC
OLE DB

Supported programming languages

.Net
C
C#
C++
VB.Net

Java

All languages supporting JDBC/ODBC/ADO.Net

.Net
Go
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
Python

C
C++
Fortran
Java
Lua
Perl
Python
R

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

Java Stored Procedures

yes

Triggers

no, except callback-events from server when changes happened

yes

Cache Event Listeners

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Proprietary Sharding system

Sharding

by using Terracotta Server

Sharding

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

yes

by using Terracotta Server

Multi-source replication between multi datacenters

Source-replica replication

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

yes

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Tunable Consistency (Strong, Eventual, Weak)

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

yes

supports JTA and can work as an XA resource

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

using a tiered cache-storage approach

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

Windows-Profile

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

Users with fine-grained authorization concept

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

Jira Data Center user? Here's a critical Ehcache vulnerability to spoil your day
22 July 2021, The Register

Atlassian asks customers to patch critical Jira vulnerability
22 July 2021, BleepingComputer

How to partition Sonatype Nexus Repository: Targets, privileges, and roles
9 February 2010, Sonatype Blog

provided by Google News

How Open-Source Database immudb Plans to Handle All That Metaverse Data
10 October 2022, Acceleration Economy

Codenotary brings its immutable database to the cloud
21 June 2023, TechCrunch

Storage news ticker – November 15
15 November 2021, Blocks & Files

Codenotary introduces Software Bill of Materials service for Kubernetes
28 June 2022, ZDNet

Codenotary raises $6M of additional capital to scale business operations
8 September 2022, Help Net Security

provided by Google News

How to migrate a large data warehouse from IBM Netezza to Amazon Redshift with no downtime
21 August 2019, AWS Blog

Five real-life Netezza performance server use cases
29 June 2020, ibm.com

AWS and IBM Netezza come out in support of Iceberg in table format face-off
1 August 2023, The Register

IBM Completes Acquisition of Netezza
26 October 2017, PR Newswire

U.S. Navy Chooses Yellowbrick, Sunsets IBM Netezza
22 March 2023, Business Wire

provided by Google News

Share this page