DBMS > Cubrid vs. GigaSpaces vs. LeanXcale vs. OpenEdge

System Properties Comparison Cubrid vs. GigaSpaces vs. LeanXcale vs. OpenEdge

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

CUBRID is an open-source SQL-based relational database management system with object extensions for OLTP

High performance in-memory data grid platform, powering three products: Smart Cache, Smart ODS (Operational Data Store), Smart Augmented Transactions

A highly scalable full ACID SQL database with fast NoSQL data ingestion and GIS capabilities

Application development environment with integrated database management system

Primary database model

Relational DBMS

Document store
Object oriented DBMS

Values are user defined objects

Key-value store
Relational DBMS

Relational DBMS

Secondary database models

Graph DBMS
Search engine

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.95
Rank	#188	Overall
	#86	Relational DBMS

Score	0.94
Rank	#194	Overall
	#33	Document stores
	#7	Object oriented DBMS

Score	0.28
Rank	#285	Overall
	#41	Key-value stores
	#130	Relational DBMS

Score	3.56
Rank	#78	Overall
	#42	Relational DBMS

Website

cubrid.com (korean)
cubrid.org (english)

www.gigaspaces.com

www.leanxcale.com

www.progress.com/openedge

Technical documentation

cubrid.org/manuals

docs.gigaspaces.com/latest/landing.html

documentation.progress.com/output/ua/OpenEdge_latest

Developer

CUBRID Corporation, CUBRID Foundation

Gigaspaces Technologies

LeanXcale

Progress Software Corporation

Initial release

2008

2000

2015

1984

Current release

11.0, January 2021

15.5, September 2020

OpenEdge 12.2, March 2020

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

Apache Version 2.0

Open Source

Apache Version 2; Commercial licenses available

commercial

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

C, C++, Java

Java, C++, .Net

Server operating systems

Linux
Windows

Linux
macOS
Solaris
Windows

AIX
HP-UX
Linux
Solaris
Windows

Data scheme

yes

schema-free

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

XML can be used for describing objects metadata

yes

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

yes

SQL-99 for query and DML statements

yes

through Apache Derby

yes

close to SQL 92

APIs and other access methods

ADO.NET
JDBC
ODBC
OLE DB

GigaSpaces LRMI
Hibernate
JCache
JDBC
JPA
ODBC
RESTful HTTP API
Spring Data

JDBC
Kafka Connector
ODBC
proprietary key/value interface
Spark Connector

JDBC
ODBC

Supported programming languages

C
C#
C++
Go
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
Perl
PHP
Python
Ruby

.Net
C++
Java
Python
Scala

C
Java
Scala

Progress proprietary ABL (Advanced Business Language)

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

Java Stored Procedures

yes

Triggers

yes

yes, event driven architecture

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

none

Sharding

horizontal partitioning

since Version 11.4

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

Source-replica replication

Multi-source replication

synchronous or asynchronous
Source-replica replication

synchronous or asynchronous

Source-replica replication

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

yes

Map-Reduce pattern can be built with XAP task executors

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Consistency level configurable: ALL, QUORUM, ANY

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

Role-based access control

Users and groups

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

NHN Willing to Be More Open
24 November 2008, 코리아타임스

provided by Google News

Your occasional storage digest with GigaSpaces, Virtana and NAND ship data
7 December 2020, Blocks & Files

GigaSpaces Optimizes the Balance Between Performance and Cost with Enhanced InsightEdge Portfolio
17 February 2021, Database Trends and Applications

GigaSpaces XAP – Now on Amazon EC2
24 June 2008, AWS Blog

New Digital Integration Hub from GigaSpaces and Informatica
31 May 2019, RTInsights

Top 3 In-memory Computing Platforms
6 November 2019, Customer Think

provided by Google News

What's New in OpenEdge 12.8
15 April 2024, release.nl

4 sources of latency and how to avoid them
1 November 2017, InfoWorld

provided by Google News

Share this page