DBMS > Blazegraph vs. GRAKN.AI
System Properties Comparison Blazegraph vs. GRAKN.AI
Please select another system to include it in the comparison.
|Editorial information provided by DB-Engines|
|Name||Blazegraph Xexclude from comparison||GRAKN.AI Xexclude from comparison|
|Amazon has acquired Blazegraph's domain and (probably) product. It is said that Amazon Neptune is based on Blazegraph.|
|Description||High-performance graph database supporting Semantic Web (RDF/SPARQL) and Graph Database (tinkerpop3, blueprints, vertex-centric) APIs with scale-out and High Availability.||Grakn is a distributed, hyper-relational database for managing complex data that serves as a knowledge base for cognitive/AI systems.|
|Primary database model||Graph DBMS|
Relational DBMS Often described as a 'hyper-relational' database, since it implements the 'Entity-Relationship Paradigm' to manage complex data structures and ontologies.
|Developer||Blazegraph||Grakn Labs Ltd|
|Current release||2.1.4, August 2016||1.5.8, August 2019|
|License Commercial or Open Source||Open Source extended commercial license available||Open Source GPL Version 3, commercial licenses available|
|Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service||no||no|
|DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service|
Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
|Server operating systems||Linux|
|Typing predefined data types such as float or date||yes RDF literal types||yes|
|XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.||no|
|SQL Support of SQL||SPARQL is used as query language||no|
|APIs and other access methods||Java API|
RESTful HTTP API
Workbase (visualisation software)
|Supported programming languages||.Net|
|All JVM based languages|
|Server-side scripts Stored procedures||yes||no|
|Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes||Sharding||Sharding by using Cassandra|
|Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes||yes||Master-master replication by using Cassandra|
|MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods||no||yes by using Apache Kafka and Apache Zookeeper|
|Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system||Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration||Immediate Consistency|
|Foreign keys Referential integrity||yes Relationships in Graphs||no substituted by the relationship feature|
|Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data||ACID||ACID|
|Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data||yes||yes|
|Durability Support for making data persistent||yes||yes|
|In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.||no|
|User concepts Access control||Security and Authentication via Web Application Container (Tomcat, Jetty)||yes at REST API level; other APIs in progress|
|More information provided by the system vendor|
|Specific characteristics||Grakn is the knowledge graph to organise complex networks of data and making it queryable,...|
|Competitive advantages||Expressive and flexible data model: The meta-schema of Grakn allows for modelling...|
|Typical application scenarios||Life sciences : Grakn makes working with biological data much easier and accelerates...|
|Licensing and pricing models||AGPL and Commercial . The commercial license is priced based on cluster resources...|
Blazegraph 2.1.4 Release
Blazegraph 2.1.2 Release
Blazegraph 2.1.1 Release!
Blazegraph 2.1.0 Release!
Blazegraph 2.0.0 Release!
Related products and services
We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
|Recent citations in the news|
GPU Database Market 2019 explosive growth with technical aspects by major players BlazingDB, Anaconda, OmniSci, Blazegraph, Fuzzy Logix, NVIDIA, Zilliz, Brytlyt, HeteroDB, SQream
GPU Database Market Estimated to Rising at a Lucrative CAGR of +20% between 2019 and 2028 with Leading Vendors: Kinetica, OmniSci, SQream, Neo4j, NVIDIA, Brytlyt, Blazegraph, BlazingDB
Graph Database Market 2019 Major Manufacturers, Technology Trends and Industry Growth till 2025
Graph Database Market Research Technology Outlook 2019-2025
Technological Trends in Graph Database Market by 2019-2025 | Leading Players IBM, Microsoft, Oracle, AWS, Neo4j, Orientdb, Teradata, Tibco Software, Franz, Openlink Software, Marklogic
provided by Google News
Get Started With GRAKN.AI
GRAKN.AI: How Haikal Pribadi went from being a refugee to building a database for AI systems
What Is an Ontology?
Kannur-based startup ArticBot bets big on machine learning
Oracle launches startup cloud accelerator in Bristol
provided by Google News
ANALYST, IT, SR
Semantic Java Developer - Scientific Computing
Share this page