DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Teradata vs. Valentina Server vs. VelocityDB

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Teradata vs. Valentina Server vs. VelocityDB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	Teradata  Xexclude from comparison	Valentina Server  Xexclude from comparison	VelocityDB  Xexclude from comparison
	This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.
Description	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	A hybrid cloud data analytics software platform (Teradata Vantage)	Object-relational database and reports server	A .NET Object Database that can be embedded/distributed and extended to a graph data model (VelocityGraph)
Primary database model	Document store Key-value store	Relational DBMS	Relational DBMS	Graph DBMS Object oriented DBMS
Secondary database models		Document store Graph DBMS Spatial DBMS Time Series DBMS
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart		Score 44.87 Rank #22   Overall #15   Relational DBMS	Score 0.21 Rank #325   Overall #144   Relational DBMS	Score 0.11 Rank #354   Overall #37   Graph DBMS #16   Object oriented DBMS
Website	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	www.teradata.com	www.valentina-db.net	velocitydb.com
Technical documentation		docs.teradata.com	valentina-db.com/­docs/­dokuwiki/­v5/­doku.php	velocitydb.com/­UserGuide
Developer	Atos Convergence Creators	Teradata	Paradigma Software	VelocityDB Inc
Initial release	2016	1984	1999	2011
Current release	1703	Teradata Vantage 1.0 MU2, January 2019	5.7.5	7.x
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	commercial	commercial	commercial
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Java			C#
Server operating systems	Linux	hosted Linux	Linux OS X Windows	Any that supports .NET
Data scheme	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	yes	yes	yes
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	optional	yes	yes	yes
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	yes	yes		no
Secondary indexes	yes	yes Join-index to prejoin tables, aggregate index, sparse index, hash index	yes	yes
SQL Support of SQL	no	yes SQL 2016 + extensions	yes	no
APIs and other access methods	LDAP	.NET Client API HTTP REST JDBC JMS Adapter ODBC OLE DB	ODBC	.Net
Supported programming languages	All languages with LDAP bindings	C C++ Cobol Java (JDBC-ODBC) Perl PL/1 Python R Ruby	.Net C C# C++ Objective-C PHP Ruby Visual Basic Visual Basic.NET	.Net
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	yes UDFs, stored procedures, table functions in parallel	yes	no
Triggers	yes	yes	yes	Callbacks are triggered when data changes
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding cell division	Sharding Hashing		Sharding
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	yes	Multi-source replication Source-replica replication
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods		no	no	no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration	Immediate Consistency		Immediate Consistency
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	yes	yes	no
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	Atomic execution of specific operations	ACID		ACID
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes		yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes	yes	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes	yes	yes	yes
User concepts Access control	LDAP bind authentication	fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard	fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard	Based on Windows Authentication
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Atos Standard Common Repository	Teradata	Valentina Server	VelocityDB
DB-Engines blog posts		Teradata is the most popular data warehouse DBMS 2 April 2013, Paul Andlinger show all
Recent citations in the news		Teradata Co. (NYSE:TDC) Given Average Rating of “Hold” by Analysts 16 June 2024, Defense World TERADATA ALERT: Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. Announces that a Class Action Lawsuit Has Been Filed Against ... 15 June 2024, GlobeNewswire SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Pomerantz Law Firm Reminds Shareholders with Losses on their Investment in Teradata ... 15 June 2024, PR Newswire Teradata Stock: Much More Enticing Now Than Last Year, But Uncertainty Lingers (NYSE:TDC) 14 June 2024, Seeking Alpha Is There Now An Opportunity In Teradata Corporation (NYSE:TDC)? 11 June 2024, Simply Wall St provided by Google News	A Look at Valentina — SitePoint 18 April 2014, SitePoint MySQL GUI Tools for Windows and Ubuntu/Linux: Top 8 free or open source 7 December 2018, H2S Media provided by Google News

Share this page