DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. SQL.JS vs. Stardog vs. Transwarp KunDB

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. SQL.JS vs. Stardog vs. Transwarp KunDB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	SQL.JS  Xexclude from comparison	Stardog  Xexclude from comparison	Transwarp KunDB  Xexclude from comparison
	This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.
Description	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	Port of SQLite to JavaScript	Enterprise Knowledge Graph platform and graph DBMS with high availability, high performance reasoning, and virtualization	OLTP DBMS based on a distributed architecture and highly compatible with MySQL and Oracle
Primary database model	Document store Key-value store	Relational DBMS	Graph DBMS RDF store	Relational DBMS
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart		Score 0.63 Rank #241   Overall #112   Relational DBMS	Score 2.07 Rank #122   Overall #11   Graph DBMS #6   RDF stores	Score 0.14 Rank #341   Overall #149   Relational DBMS
Website	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	sql.js.org	www.stardog.com	www.transwarp.cn/­en/­product/­kundb
Technical documentation		sql.js.org/­documentation/­index.html	docs.stardog.com
Developer	Atos Convergence Creators	Alon Zakai enhancements implemented by others	Stardog-Union	Transwarp
Initial release	2016	2012	2010
Current release	1703		7.3.0, May 2020
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	Open Source	commercial 60-day fully-featured trial license; 1-year fully-featured non-commercial use license for academics/students	commercial
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Java	JavaScript	Java
Server operating systems	Linux	server-less, requires a JavaScript environment (browser, Node.js)	Linux macOS Windows
Data scheme	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	yes	schema-free and OWL/RDFS-schema support	yes
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	optional	yes	yes	yes
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	yes	no	no Import/export of XML data possible
Secondary indexes	yes		yes supports real-time indexing in full-text and geospatial	yes
SQL Support of SQL	no	yes SQL-92 is not fully supported	Yes, compatible with all major SQL variants through dedicated BI/SQL Server	yes
APIs and other access methods	LDAP	JavaScript API	GraphQL query language HTTP API Jena RDF API OWL RDF4J API Sesame REST HTTP Protocol SNARL SPARQL Spring Data Stardog Studio TinkerPop 3
Supported programming languages	All languages with LDAP bindings	JavaScript	.Net Clojure Groovy Java JavaScript Python Ruby
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	no	user defined functions and aggregates, HTTP Server extensions in Java	yes
Triggers	yes	no	yes via event handlers	yes
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding cell division	none	none	horizontal partitioning
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	yes	none	Multi-source replication in HA-Cluster
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods		no	no	no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration	none	Immediate Consistency in HA-Cluster	Immediate Consistency
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	yes	yes relationships in graphs	yes
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	Atomic execution of specific operations	ACID	ACID	ACID
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes		yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	no except by serializing a db to a file	yes	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes	yes	yes
User concepts Access control	LDAP bind authentication	no	Access rights for users and roles	yes
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Atos Standard Common Repository	SQL.JS	Stardog	Transwarp KunDB
DB-Engines blog posts		New kids on the block: database management systems implemented in JavaScript 1 December 2014, Matthias Gelbmann show all
Recent citations in the news		9 Best JavaScript and TypeScript ORMs for 2024 — SitePoint 22 March 2023, SitePoint Execute millions of SQL statements in milliseconds in the browser with WebAssembly and Web Workers. 14 January 2017, hackernoon.com SQLite On The Web: Absurd-sql 24 August 2021, Hackaday In Praise Of SQLite 28 July 2022, iProgrammer 10 Low-Code Rules for Serious Coders 21 November 2022, Embedded Computing Design provided by Google News

Share this page