DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Riak TS vs. RisingWave vs. SiteWhere

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Riak TS vs. RisingWave vs. SiteWhere

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.

Description

Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks

Riak TS is a distributed NoSQL database optimized for time series data and based on Riak KV

A distributed RDBMS for stream processing, wire-compatible with PostgreSQL

M2M integration platform for persisting/querying time series data

Primary database model

Document store
Key-value store

Time Series DBMS

Relational DBMS

Time Series DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.17
Rank	#318	Overall
	#27	Time Series DBMS

Score	0.61
Rank	#237	Overall
	#111	Relational DBMS

Score	0.07
Rank	#347	Overall
	#33	Time Series DBMS

Website

atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository

www.risingwave.com/database

github.com/sitewhere/sitewhere

Technical documentation

www.tiot.jp/riak-docs/riak/ts/latest

docs.risingwave.com/docs/current/intro

sitewhere1.sitewhere.io/index.html

Developer

Atos Convergence Creators

Open Source, formerly Basho Technologies

RisingWave Labs

SiteWhere

Initial release

2016

2015

2022

2010

Current release

1703

3.0.0, September 2022

1.2, September 2023

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

Open Source

Apache Version 2.0

Open Source

Common Public Attribution License Version 1.0

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Java

Erlang

Rust

Java

Server operating systems

Linux

Linux
OS X

Docker
Linux
macOS

Linux
OS X
Windows

Data scheme

Schema and schema-less with LDAP views

schema-free

yes

predefined scheme

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

optional

Standard SQL-types and JSON

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

Secondary indexes

yes

restricted

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

yes, limited

yes

APIs and other access methods

LDAP

HTTP API
Native Erlang Interface

JDBC
PostgreSQL wire protocol

HTTP REST

Supported programming languages

All languages with LDAP bindings

unofficial client library
C#
C++

unofficial client library
Clojure

unofficial client library
Dart

unofficial client library
Erlang
Go

unofficial client library
Groovy

unofficial client library
Haskell

unofficial client library
Java
JavaScript

unofficial client library
Lisp

unofficial client library
Perl

unofficial client library
PHP
Python
Ruby
Scala

unofficial client library
Smalltalk

unofficial client library

Go
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
Python

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

Erlang

UDFs in Python or Java

Triggers

yes

pre-commit hooks and post-commit hooks

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Sharding

cell division

Sharding

based on HBase

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

yes

selectable replication factor

based on HBase

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

yes

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration

Eventual Consistency

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

links between datasets can be stored

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

Atomic execution of specific operations

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

LDAP bind authentication

Users and Roles

Users with fine-grained authorization concept

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

Is Riak A Good NoSQL Database Option For Enterprises?
1 July 2019, AIM

Best open source databases for IoT applications
26 May 2017, Open Source For You

provided by Google News

Streaming Databases: Embracing the Convergence of Stream Processing and Databases
17 May 2024, InfoQ.com

Infostealers on the Rise: A New Wave of Major Data Breaches?
1 July 2024, Security Boulevard

Open Source Ibis 8.0 Lets Data Teams Write Code Once and
12 February 2024, GlobeNewswire

A rising wave of tech disruptors: The future of defense innovation?
22 February 2024, McKinsey

RisingWave Cloud Democratizes Event Stream Processing, Making It Affordable at Cloud Scale
27 June 2023, Datanami

provided by Google News

SiteWhere: An open platform for connected devices
11 July 2017, Open Source For You

Top Open-Source Tools for IoT Development in 2024
5 September 2024, Analytics Insight

11 Best Open source IoT Platforms To Develop Smart Projects
9 March 2023, H2S Media

provided by Google News

Share this page