DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Oracle NoSQL vs. Transwarp StellarDB vs. Yaacomo

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Oracle NoSQL vs. Transwarp StellarDB vs. Yaacomo

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	Oracle NoSQL  Xexclude from comparison	Transwarp StellarDB  Xexclude from comparison	Yaacomo  Xexclude from comparison
	This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.			Yaacomo seems to be discontinued and is removed from the DB-Engines ranking
Description	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	A multi-model, scalable, distributed NoSQL database, designed to provide highly reliable, flexible, and available data management across a configurable set of storage nodes	A distributed graph DBMS built for enterprise-level graph applications	OpenCL based in-memory RDBMS, designed for efficiently utilizing the hardware via parallel computing
Primary database model	Document store Key-value store	Document store Key-value store Relational DBMS	Graph DBMS	Relational DBMS
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart		Score 3.05 Rank #97   Overall #17   Document stores #16   Key-value stores #50   Relational DBMS	Score 0.07 Rank #371   Overall #39   Graph DBMS
Website	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	www.oracle.com/­database/­nosql/­technologies/­nosql	www.transwarp.cn/­en/­product/­stellardb	yaacomo.com
Technical documentation		docs.oracle.com/­en/­database/­other-databases/­nosql-database/­index.html
Developer	Atos Convergence Creators	Oracle	Transwarp	Q2WEB GmbH
Initial release	2016	2011		2009
Current release	1703	24.1, May 2024
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	Open Source Proprietary for Enterprise Edition (Oracle Database EE license has Oracle NoSQL database EE covered: details)	commercial	commercial
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Java	Java
Server operating systems	Linux	Linux Solaris SPARC/x86		Android Linux Windows
Data scheme	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	Support Fixed schema and Schema-less deployment with the ability to interoperate between them.		yes
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	optional	optional		yes
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	yes	no		no
Secondary indexes	yes	yes		yes
SQL Support of SQL	no	SQL-like DML and DDL statements	SQL-like query language	yes
APIs and other access methods	LDAP	RESTful HTTP API	OpenCypher	JDBC ODBC
Supported programming languages	All languages with LDAP bindings	C C# Go Java JavaScript (Node.js) Python
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	no
Triggers	yes	no		yes
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding cell division	Sharding	horizontal partitioning	horizontal partitioning
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	yes	Electable source-replica replication per shard. Support distributed global deployment with Multi-region table feature		Source-replica replication
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods		with Hadoop integration		no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration	Eventual Consistency Immediate Consistency depending on configuration		Immediate Consistency
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	no		yes
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	Atomic execution of specific operations	configurable ACID within a storage node (=shard)		ACID
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes	yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes	yes	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes	yes off heap cache		yes
User concepts Access control	LDAP bind authentication	Access rights for users and roles	yes	fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Atos Standard Common Repository	Oracle NoSQL	Transwarp StellarDB	Yaacomo
Recent citations in the news		Oracle Beefs Up Its NoSQL Database Offering 31 May 2024, Data Center Knowledge OpenWorld 2013: Oracle NoSQL Database On the Rise? 13 December 2023, Channel Futures Blog Theme - Details 21 August 2023, blogs.oracle.com We built a geo-distributed, serverless modern app using the Oracle NoSQL Database Cloud Service 18 November 2021, blogs.oracle.com Oracle NoSQL database comes to the cloud 2 April 2020, TechTarget provided by Google News

Share this page