DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Microsoft Azure Table Storage vs. OpenTenBase vs. Postgres-XL

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Microsoft Azure Table Storage vs. OpenTenBase vs. Postgres-XL

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	Microsoft Azure Table Storage  Xexclude from comparison	OpenTenBase  Xexclude from comparison	Postgres-XL  Xexclude from comparison
	This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.
Description	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	A Wide Column Store for rapid development using massive semi-structured datasets	An enterprise-level distributed HTAP open source database based on PostgreSQL	Based on PostgreSQL enhanced with MPP and write-scale-out cluster features
Primary database model	Document store Key-value store	Wide column store	Relational DBMS	Relational DBMS
Secondary database models				Document store Spatial DBMS
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart		Score 4.04 Rank #77   Overall #6   Wide column stores	Score 0.08 Rank #370   Overall #156   Relational DBMS	Score 0.53 Rank #254   Overall #117   Relational DBMS
Website	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	azure.microsoft.com/­en-us/­services/­storage/­tables	github.com/­OpenTenBase/­OpenTenBase www.opentenbase.org	www.postgres-xl.org
Technical documentation			docs.opentenbase.org docs.opentenbase.org/­en	www.postgres-xl.org/­documentation
Developer	Atos Convergence Creators	Microsoft	OpenAtom Foundation, previously Tencent
Initial release	2016	2012		2014 since 2012, originally named StormDB
Current release	1703		2.5, January 2024	10 R1, October 2018
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	commercial	Open Source BSD-3	Open Source Mozilla public license
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	yes	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Java			C
Server operating systems	Linux	hosted	Linux	Linux macOS
Data scheme	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	schema-free	yes	yes
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	optional	yes	yes	yes
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	yes	no		yes XML type, but no XML query functionality
Secondary indexes	yes	no	yes	yes
SQL Support of SQL	no	no	yes	yes distributed, parallel query execution
APIs and other access methods	LDAP	RESTful HTTP API		ADO.NET JDBC native C library ODBC streaming API for large objects
Supported programming languages	All languages with LDAP bindings	.Net C# C++ Java JavaScript (Node.js) PHP Python Ruby	C Go Java PHP Python	.Net C C++ Delphi Erlang Java JavaScript (Node.js) Perl PHP Python Tcl
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	no		user defined functions
Triggers	yes	no	yes	yes
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding cell division	Sharding Implicit feature of the cloud service	Sharding	horizontal partitioning
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	yes	yes implicit feature of the cloud service. Replication either local, cross-facility or geo-redundant.	yes
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods		no		no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration	Immediate Consistency	Immediate Consistency	Immediate Consistency
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	no	yes	yes
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	Atomic execution of specific operations	optimistic locking	ACID	ACID MVCC
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes	yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes	yes	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes	no		no
User concepts Access control	LDAP bind authentication	Access rights based on private key authentication or shared access signatures	Access rights for users, groups and roles according to SQL-standard	fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Atos Standard Common Repository	Microsoft Azure Table Storage	OpenTenBase	Postgres-XL
Recent citations in the news		Working with Azure to Use and Manage Data Lakes 7 March 2024, Simplilearn How to Use C# Azure.Data.Tables SDK with Azure Cosmos DB 9 July 2021, hackernoon.com How to use Azure Table storage in .Net 14 January 2019, InfoWorld Quick Guide to Azure Storage Pricing 16 May 2023, DevOps.com How to write data to Azure Table Store with an Azure Function 14 April 2017, Experts Exchange provided by Google News

Share this page