DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Lovefield vs. SAP Advantage Database Server vs. TerarkDB

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Lovefield vs. SAP Advantage Database Server vs. TerarkDB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	Lovefield  Xexclude from comparison	SAP Advantage Database Server former name: Sybase ADS  Xexclude from comparison	TerarkDB  Xexclude from comparison
	This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.		SAP Advantage Database Server seems to be discontinued. Therefore it is excluded from the DB-Engines Ranking.
Description	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	Embeddable relational database for web apps written in pure JavaScript	Low-cost RDBMS with access to ISAM and FoxPro data structures	A key-value store forked from RocksDB with advanced compression algorithms. It can be used standalone or as a storage engine for MySQL and MongoDB
Primary database model	Document store Key-value store	Relational DBMS	Relational DBMS	Key-value store
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart		Score 0.33 Rank #286   Overall #131   Relational DBMS		Score 0.08 Rank #367   Overall #56   Key-value stores
Website	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	google.github.io/­lovefield	www.sap.com/products/advantage-database-server.html	github.com/­bytedance/­terarkdb
Technical documentation		github.com/­google/­lovefield/­blob/­master/­docs/­spec_index.md		bytedance.larkoffice.com/­docs/­doccnZmYFqHBm06BbvYgjsHHcKc
Developer	Atos Convergence Creators	Google	Sybase, SAP	ByteDance, originally Terark
Initial release	2016	2014	1993	2016
Current release	1703	2.1.12, February 2017
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	Open Source Apache 2.0	commercial	commercial restricted open source version available
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Java	JavaScript		C++
Server operating systems	Linux	server-less, requires a JavaScript environment (browser, Node.js) tested with Chrome, Firefox, IE, Safari	Linux Windows
Data scheme	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	yes	yes	schema-free
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	optional	yes	yes	no
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	yes	no	no	no
Secondary indexes	yes	yes	yes	no
SQL Support of SQL	no	SQL-like query language via JavaScript builder pattern	yes	no
APIs and other access methods	LDAP		.NET Client API ADO.NET JDBC ODBC OLE DB	C++ API Java API
Supported programming languages	All languages with LDAP bindings	JavaScript	Delphi Perl PHP	C++ Java
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	no	yes	no
Triggers	yes	Using read-only observers	yes	no
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding cell division	none	none	none
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	yes	none	Multi-source replication CONFLICT Trigger to resolve replication conflicts Source-replica replication	none
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods		no	no	no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration		Immediate Consistency
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	yes	yes	no
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	Atomic execution of specific operations	ACID	ACID	no
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes	yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes, by using IndexedDB or the cloud service Firebase Realtime Database	yes	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes	yes using MemoryDB	no caching of (temporary) tables can be configured	yes
User concepts Access control	LDAP bind authentication	no	fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard	no
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Atos Standard Common Repository	Lovefield	SAP Advantage Database Server former name: Sybase ADS	TerarkDB
Recent citations in the news			SAP Announces Q3 2023 Results: Asia Pacific and Japan View 19 October 2023, SAP News provided by Google News	A Chinese company is making the cloud 200x faster · TechNode 3 July 2017, TechNode provided by Google News

Share this page