DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. JanusGraph vs. Valentina Server vs. Yanza

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. JanusGraph vs. Valentina Server vs. Yanza

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	JanusGraph successor of Titan  Xexclude from comparison	Valentina Server  Xexclude from comparison	Yanza  Xexclude from comparison
	This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.			Yanza seems to be discontinued. Therefore it is excluded from the DB-Engines Ranking.
Description	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	A Graph DBMS optimized for distributed clusters It was forked from the latest code base of Titan in January 2017	Object-relational database and reports server	Time Series DBMS for IoT Applications
Primary database model	Document store Key-value store	Graph DBMS	Relational DBMS	Time Series DBMS
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart		Score 2.02 Rank #125   Overall #12   Graph DBMS	Score 0.21 Rank #325   Overall #144   Relational DBMS
Website	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	janusgraph.org	www.valentina-db.net	yanza.com
Technical documentation		docs.janusgraph.org	valentina-db.com/­docs/­dokuwiki/­v5/­doku.php
Developer	Atos Convergence Creators	Linux Foundation; originally developed as Titan by Aurelius	Paradigma Software	Yanza
Initial release	2016	2017	1999	2015
Current release	1703	0.6.3, February 2023	5.7.5
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	Open Source Apache 2.0	commercial	commercial free version available
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	no	no but mainly used as a service provided by Yanza
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Java	Java
Server operating systems	Linux	Linux OS X Unix Windows	Linux OS X Windows	Windows
Data scheme	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	yes	yes	schema-free
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	optional	yes	yes	no
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	yes	no		no
Secondary indexes	yes	yes	yes	no
SQL Support of SQL	no	no	yes	no
APIs and other access methods	LDAP	Java API TinkerPop Blueprints TinkerPop Frames TinkerPop Gremlin TinkerPop Rexster	ODBC	HTTP API
Supported programming languages	All languages with LDAP bindings	Clojure Java Python	.Net C C# C++ Objective-C PHP Ruby Visual Basic Visual Basic.NET	any language that supports HTTP calls
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	yes	yes	no
Triggers	yes	yes	yes	yes Timer and event based
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding cell division	yes depending on the used storage backend (e.g. Cassandra, HBase, BerkeleyDB)		none
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	yes	yes		none
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods		yes via Faunus, a graph analytics engine	no	no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration	Eventual Consistency Immediate Consistency		Immediate Consistency
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	yes Relationships in graphs	yes	no
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	Atomic execution of specific operations	ACID		no
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes		yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes Supports various storage backends: Cassandra, HBase, Berkeley DB, Akiban, Hazelcast	yes	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes		yes
User concepts Access control	LDAP bind authentication	User authentification and security via Rexster Graph Server	fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard	no
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Atos Standard Common Repository	JanusGraph successor of Titan	Valentina Server	Yanza
Recent citations in the news	Infographic: What makes a Mobile Operator's setup future proof? 10 February 2024, Atos provided by Google News	Database Deep Dives: JanusGraph 8 August 2019, IBM JanusGraph Picks Up Where TitanDB Left Off 13 January 2017, Datanami From graph db to graph embedding. In 7 simple steps. | by Andy Greatorex 30 July 2020, Towards Data Science Nordstrom Builds Flexible Backend Ops with Kubernetes, Spark and JanusGraph 3 October 2019, The New Stack Compose for JanusGraph arrives on Bluemix 15 September 2017, IBM provided by Google News	A Look at Valentina — SitePoint 18 April 2014, SitePoint MySQL GUI Tools for Windows and Ubuntu/Linux: Top 8 free or open source 7 December 2018, H2S Media provided by Google News

Share this page