DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. JaguarDB vs. Transbase vs. Typesense

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. JaguarDB vs. Transbase vs. Typesense

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	JaguarDB  Xexclude from comparison	Transbase  Xexclude from comparison	Typesense  Xexclude from comparison
	This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.
Description	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	Performant, highly scalable DBMS for AI and IoT applications	A resource-optimized, high-performance, universally applicable RDBMS	A typo-tolerant, in-memory search engine optimized for instant search-as-you-type experiences and developer productivity
Primary database model	Document store Key-value store	Key-value store Vector DBMS	Relational DBMS	Search engine
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart		Score 0.06 Rank #381   Overall #59   Key-value stores #15   Vector DBMS	Score 0.17 Rank #334   Overall #148   Relational DBMS	Score 0.76 Rank #219   Overall #14   Search engines
Website	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	www.jaguardb.com	www.transaction.de/­en/­products/­transbase.html	typesense.org
Technical documentation		www.jaguardb.com/­support.html	www.transaction.de/­en/­products/­transbase/­features.html	typesense.org/­docs
Developer	Atos Convergence Creators	DataJaguar, Inc.	Transaction Software GmbH
Initial release	2016	2015	1987	2015
Current release	1703	3.3 July 2023	Transbase 8.3, 2022
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	Open Source GPL V3.0	commercial free development license	Open Source GPL V3
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Java	C++ the server part. Clients available in other languages	C and C++	C++
Server operating systems	Linux	Linux	FreeBSD Linux macOS Solaris Windows	Linux
Data scheme	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	yes	yes	schema-free pre-defined schema optional
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	optional	yes	yes	yes
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	yes	no	no
Secondary indexes	yes	yes	yes	yes
SQL Support of SQL	no	A subset of ANSI SQL is implemented but no views, foreign keys, triggers	yes	no
APIs and other access methods	LDAP	JDBC ODBC	ADO.NET JDBC ODBC Proprietary native API	RESTful HTTP API
Supported programming languages	All languages with LDAP bindings	C C++ Go Java JavaScript (Node.js) PHP Python Ruby Scala	C C# C++ Java JavaScript Kotlin Objective-C PHP Python	.Net community maintained Clojure community maintained Dart community maintained Go community maintained Java community maintained JavaScript Perl community maintained PHP Python Ruby Rust community maintained Swift community maintained
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	no	yes	no
Triggers	yes	no	yes
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding cell division	Sharding
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	yes	Multi-source replication	Source-replica replication	Multi-source replication using RAFT
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods		no	no	no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration	Eventual Consistency	Immediate Consistency
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	no	yes	no
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	Atomic execution of specific operations	no	yes	no
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes	yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes	yes	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes	no	no	yes
User concepts Access control	LDAP bind authentication	rights management via user accounts	fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Atos Standard Common Repository	JaguarDB	Transbase	Typesense
Recent citations in the news				Laravel Scout Adds Typesense, A Lightening-fast Open-source Search 17 January 2024, Laravel News Elasticsearch alternatives: 8 to consider after the license change 11 March 2021, TechGenix 5 Recipe Search Engines to Cook Based on Time, Budget, & Ingredients - MUO 19 April 2022, MakeUseOf Olivia Munn & John Mulaney's Toddler Malcolm Is a Style Icon 5 May 2023, SheKnows provided by Google News

Share this page