DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Hawkular Metrics vs. Sequoiadb vs. SWC-DB

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Hawkular Metrics vs. Sequoiadb vs. SWC-DB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	Hawkular Metrics  Xexclude from comparison	Sequoiadb  Xexclude from comparison	SWC-DB Super Wide Column Database  Xexclude from comparison
	This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.
Description	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	Hawkular metrics is the metric storage of the Red Hat sponsored Hawkular monitoring system. It is based on Cassandra.	NewSQL database with distributed OLTP and SQL	A high performance, scalable Wide Column DBMS
Primary database model	Document store Key-value store	Time Series DBMS	Document store Relational DBMS	Wide column store
Secondary database models				Time Series DBMS
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart		Score 0.08 Rank #366   Overall #39   Time Series DBMS	Score 0.50 Rank #258   Overall #41   Document stores #120   Relational DBMS	Score 0.08 Rank #364   Overall #13   Wide column stores
Website	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	www.hawkular.org	www.sequoiadb.com	github.com/­kashirin-alex/­swc-db www.swcdb.org
Technical documentation		www.hawkular.org/­hawkular-metrics/­docs/­user-guide	www.sequoiadb.com/­en/­index.php?m=Files&a=index
Developer	Atos Convergence Creators	Community supported by Red Hat	Sequoiadb Ltd.	Alex Kashirin
Initial release	2016	2014	2013	2020
Current release	1703			0.5, April 2021
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	Open Source Apache 2.0	Open Source Server: AGPL; Client: Apache V2	Open Source GPL V3
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Java	Java	C++	C++
Server operating systems	Linux	Linux OS X Windows	Linux	Linux
Data scheme	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	schema-free	schema-free	schema-free
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	optional	yes	yes oid, date, timestamp, binary, regex
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	yes	no	no	no
Secondary indexes	yes	no	yes
SQL Support of SQL	no	no	SQL-like query language	SQL-like query language
APIs and other access methods	LDAP	HTTP REST	proprietary protocol using JSON	Proprietary protocol Thrift
Supported programming languages	All languages with LDAP bindings	Go Java Python Ruby	.Net C++ Java PHP Python	C++
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	no	JavaScript	no
Triggers	yes	yes via Hawkular Alerting	no	no
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding cell division	Sharding based on Cassandra	Sharding	Sharding
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	yes	selectable replication factor based on Cassandra	Source-replica replication
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods		no	no	no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration	Eventual Consistency based on Cassandra Immediate Consistency based on Cassandra	Eventual Consistency	Immediate Consistency
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	no	no
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	Atomic execution of specific operations	no	Document is locked during a transaction
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes	yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes	yes	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes	no	no	no
User concepts Access control	LDAP bind authentication	no	simple password-based access control
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Atos Standard Common Repository	Hawkular Metrics	Sequoiadb	SWC-DB Super Wide Column Database
Recent citations in the news		Waiting for Red Hat OpenShift 4.0? Too late, 4.1 has already arrived… • DEVCLASS 5 June 2019, DevClass provided by Google News		2022 All O-Zone Football Team 17 December 2022, Ozarks Sports Zone provided by Google News

Share this page