DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Hawkular Metrics vs. MonetDB vs. SpaceTime

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Hawkular Metrics vs. MonetDB vs. SpaceTime

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	Hawkular Metrics  Xexclude from comparison	MonetDB  Xexclude from comparison	SpaceTime  Xexclude from comparison
	This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.
Description	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	Hawkular metrics is the metric storage of the Red Hat sponsored Hawkular monitoring system. It is based on Cassandra.	A relational database management system that stores data in columns	SpaceTime is a spatio-temporal DBMS with a focus on performance.
Primary database model	Document store Key-value store	Time Series DBMS	Relational DBMS	Spatial DBMS
Secondary database models			Document store Spatial DBMS	Relational DBMS
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart		Score 0.08 Rank #366   Overall #39   Time Series DBMS	Score 1.72 Rank #141   Overall #64   Relational DBMS	Score 0.03 Rank #392   Overall #8   Spatial DBMS
Website	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	www.hawkular.org	www.monetdb.org	www.mireo.com/­spacetime
Technical documentation		www.hawkular.org/­hawkular-metrics/­docs/­user-guide	www.monetdb.org/­Documentation
Developer	Atos Convergence Creators	Community supported by Red Hat	MonetDB BV	Mireo
Initial release	2016	2014	2004	2020
Current release	1703		Dec2023 (11.49), December 2023
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	Open Source Apache 2.0	Open Source Mozilla Public License 2.0	commercial
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Java	Java	C	C++
Server operating systems	Linux	Linux OS X Windows	FreeBSD Linux OS X Solaris Windows	Linux
Data scheme	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	schema-free	yes	yes
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	optional	yes	yes	yes
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	yes	no		no
Secondary indexes	yes	no	yes	no
SQL Support of SQL	no	no	yes SQL 2003 with some extensions	A subset of ANSI SQL is implemented
APIs and other access methods	LDAP	HTTP REST	JDBC native C library MAPI library (MonetDB application programming interface) ODBC	RESTful HTTP API
Supported programming languages	All languages with LDAP bindings	Go Java Python Ruby	C C++ Java JavaScript (Node.js) Perl PHP Python R Ruby	C# C++ Python
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	no	yes, in SQL, C, R	no
Triggers	yes	yes via Hawkular Alerting	yes	no
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding cell division	Sharding based on Cassandra	Sharding via remote tables	Fixed-grid hypercubes
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	yes	selectable replication factor based on Cassandra	none Source-replica replication available in experimental status	Real-time block device replication (DRBD)
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods		no	no	no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration	Eventual Consistency based on Cassandra Immediate Consistency based on Cassandra		Immediate Consistency
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	no	yes	no
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	Atomic execution of specific operations	no	ACID	no
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes	yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes	yes	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes	no		no
User concepts Access control	LDAP bind authentication	no	fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard	yes
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Atos Standard Common Repository	Hawkular Metrics	MonetDB	SpaceTime
Recent citations in the news		Waiting for Red Hat OpenShift 4.0? Too late, 4.1 has already arrived… • DEVCLASS 5 June 2019, DevClass provided by Google News	In 2024 the MonetDB Foundation was established for the preservation, maintenance and further development of the ... 31 January 2024, Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica (CWI) MonetDB Secures Investment From (and Partners With) ServiceNow 9 December 2021, Datanami PostgreSQL, MonetDB, and Too-Big-for-Memory Data in R - Part I - DataScienceCentral.com 6 April 2018, Data Science Central How MonetDB Exploits Modern CPU Performance | by Dwi Prasetyo Adi Nugroho 14 January 2020, Towards Data Science MonetDB Solutions secures investment from ServiceNow 30 September 2019, Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica (CWI) provided by Google News

Share this page