DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Graph Engine vs. Infobright vs. SAP Advantage Database Server

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Graph Engine vs. Infobright vs. SAP Advantage Database Server

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	Graph Engine former name: Trinity  Xexclude from comparison	Infobright  Xexclude from comparison	SAP Advantage Database Server former name: Sybase ADS  Xexclude from comparison
	This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.			SAP Advantage Database Server seems to be discontinued. Therefore it is excluded from the DB-Engines Ranking.
Description	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	A distributed in-memory data processing engine, underpinned by a strongly-typed RAM store and a general distributed computation engine	High performant column-oriented DBMS for analytic workloads using MySQL or PostgreSQL as a frontend	Low-cost RDBMS with access to ISAM and FoxPro data structures
Primary database model	Document store Key-value store	Graph DBMS Key-value store	Relational DBMS	Relational DBMS
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart		Score 0.67 Rank #232   Overall #21   Graph DBMS #34   Key-value stores	Score 1.02 Rank #192   Overall #90   Relational DBMS
Website	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	www.graphengine.io	ignitetech.com/­softwarelibrary/­infobrightdb	www.sap.com/products/advantage-database-server.html
Technical documentation		www.graphengine.io/­docs/­manual
Developer	Atos Convergence Creators	Microsoft	Ignite Technologies Inc.; formerly InfoBright Inc.	Sybase, SAP
Initial release	2016	2010	2005	1993
Current release	1703
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	Open Source MIT License	commercial The open source (GPLv2) version did not support inserts/updates/deletes and was discontinued with July 2016	commercial
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Java	.NET and C	C
Server operating systems	Linux	.NET	Linux Windows	Linux Windows
Data scheme	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	yes	yes	yes
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	optional	yes	yes	yes
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	yes	no	no	no
Secondary indexes	yes		no Knowledge Grid Technology used instead	yes
SQL Support of SQL	no	no	yes	yes
APIs and other access methods	LDAP	RESTful HTTP API	ADO.NET JDBC ODBC	.NET Client API ADO.NET JDBC ODBC OLE DB
Supported programming languages	All languages with LDAP bindings	C# C++ F# Visual Basic	.Net C C# C++ D Eiffel Erlang Haskell Java Objective-C OCaml Perl PHP Python Ruby Scheme Tcl	Delphi Perl PHP
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	yes	no	yes
Triggers	yes	no	no	yes
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding cell division	horizontal partitioning	none	none
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	yes		Source-replica replication	Multi-source replication CONFLICT Trigger to resolve replication conflicts Source-replica replication
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods			no	no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration		Immediate Consistency	Immediate Consistency
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	no	no	yes
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	Atomic execution of specific operations	no	ACID	ACID
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes	yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	optional: either by committing a write-ahead log (WAL) to the local persistent storage or by dumping the memory to a persistent storage	yes	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes	yes	yes	no caching of (temporary) tables can be configured
User concepts Access control	LDAP bind authentication		fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard exploiting MySQL or PostgreSQL frontend capabilities	fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Atos Standard Common Repository	Graph Engine former name: Trinity	Infobright	SAP Advantage Database Server former name: Sybase ADS
Recent citations in the news	Infographic: What makes a Mobile Operator's setup future proof? 10 February 2024, Atos provided by Google News	Trinity 30 October 2010, Microsoft Open source Microsoft Graph Engine takes on Neo4j 13 February 2017, InfoWorld IBM releases Graph, a service that can outperform SQL databases 27 July 2016, GeekWire Aerospike Is Now a Graph Database, Too 21 June 2023, Datanami The graph analytics landscape 2019 - DataScienceCentral.com 27 February 2019, Data Science Central provided by Google News		SAP Announces Q3 2023 Results: Asia Pacific and Japan View 19 October 2023, SAP News provided by Google News

Share this page