Featured Products: Neo4j RaimaDB Milvus Datastax Astra SingleStore

DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. GBase vs. GeoMesa vs. RocksDB vs. SQL.JS

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. GBase vs. GeoMesa vs. RocksDB vs. SQL.JS

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.

Description

Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks

Widely used RDBMS in China, including analytical, transactional, distributed transactional, and cloud-native data warehousing.

GeoMesa is a distributed spatio-temporal DBMS based on various systems as storage layer.

Embeddable persistent key-value store optimized for fast storage (flash and RAM)

Port of SQLite to JavaScript

Primary database model

Document store
Key-value store

Relational DBMS

Key-value store

Relational DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	1.11
Rank	#173	Overall
	#78	Relational DBMS

Score	0.78
Rank	#214	Overall
	#4	Spatial DBMS

Score	2.84
Rank	#97	Overall
	#16	Key-value stores

Score	0.53
Rank	#246	Overall
	#115	Relational DBMS

Website

atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository

www.geomesa.org

Technical documentation

www.geomesa.org/documentation/stable/user/index.html

github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki

sql.js.org/documentation/index.html

Developer

Atos Convergence Creators

General Data Technology Co., Ltd.

CCRi and others

Facebook, Inc.

Alon Zakai

enhancements implemented by others

Initial release

2016

2004

2014

2013

2012

Current release

1703

GBase 8a, GBase 8s, GBase 8c

5.0.1, July 2024

9.4.0, June 2024

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

commercial

Open Source

Apache License 2.0

Open Source

BSD

Open Source

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

no

no

no

no

no

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Java

C, Java, Python

Scala

C++

JavaScript

Server operating systems

Linux

Linux

Linux

server-less, requires a JavaScript environment (browser, Node.js)

Data scheme

Schema and schema-less with LDAP views

yes

yes

schema-free

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

optional

yes

yes

no

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

yes

no

no

no

Secondary indexes

yes

yes

yes

no

SQL

Support of SQL

no

Standard with numerous extensions

no

no

yes

SQL-92 is not fully supported

APIs and other access methods

LDAP

ADO.NET
C API
JDBC
ODBC

C++ API
Java API

JavaScript API

Supported programming languages

All languages with LDAP bindings

C#

C
C++
Go
Java
Perl
Python
Ruby

JavaScript

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

no

user defined functions

no

no

no

Triggers

yes

yes

no

no

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Sharding

cell division

horizontal partitioning (by range, list and hash) and vertical partitioning

depending on storage layer

horizontal partitioning

none

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

yes

yes

depending on storage layer

yes

none

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

yes

no

no

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration

Immediate Consistency

depending on storage layer

none

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

no

yes

no

no

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

Atomic execution of specific operations

ACID

no

yes

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

yes

yes

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

yes

yes

yes

no

except by serializing a db to a file

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

depending on storage layer

yes

yes

User concepts

Access control

LDAP bind authentication

yes

yes

depending on the DBMS used for storage

no

no

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

DB-Engines blog posts

Spatial database management systems
6 April 2021, Matthias Gelbmann

New kids on the block: database management systems implemented in JavaScript
1 December 2014, Matthias Gelbmann

Recent citations in the news

AMD EPYC vs. Intel Xeon Cascadelake With Facebook's RocksDB Database
17 October 2019, Phoronix

Pliops Unveils Accelerated Key-Value Store That Boosts RocksDB Performance by 20x at OCP Global Summit
18 October 2022, GlobeNewswire

Did Rockset Just Solve Real-Time Analytics?
25 August 2021, Datanami

Meta’s Velox Means Database Performance Is Not Subject To Interpretation
31 August 2022, The Next Platform

Facebook’s MyRocks Truly Rocks!
21 September 2020, Open Source For You

provided by Google News

9 Best JavaScript and TypeScript ORMs for 2024
22 March 2023, SitePoint

Running PostgreSQL Inside Your Browser
8 September 2022, iProgrammer

SQLite On The Web: Absurd-sql
24 August 2021, Hackaday

React Native for beginners
31 October 2018, hackernoon.com

10 Low-Code Rules for Serious Coders
21 November 2022, Embedded Computing Design

provided by Google News

Share this page

Featured Products

Present your product here