DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. FileMaker vs. Google Cloud Bigtable vs. Transwarp StellarDB

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. FileMaker vs. Google Cloud Bigtable vs. Transwarp StellarDB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	FileMaker  Xexclude from comparison	Google Cloud Bigtable  Xexclude from comparison	Transwarp StellarDB  Xexclude from comparison
	This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.
Description	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	FileMaker is a cross-platform RDBMS that includes a GUI frontend.	Google's NoSQL Big Data database service. It's the same database that powers many core Google services, including Search, Analytics, Maps, and Gmail.	A distributed graph DBMS built for enterprise-level graph applications
Primary database model	Document store Key-value store	Relational DBMS	Key-value store Wide column store	Graph DBMS
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart		Score 47.91 Rank #20   Overall #14   Relational DBMS	Score 3.15 Rank #95   Overall #14   Key-value stores #8   Wide column stores	Score 0.07 Rank #371   Overall #39   Graph DBMS
Website	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	www.claris.com/­filemaker	cloud.google.com/­bigtable	www.transwarp.cn/­en/­product/­stellardb
Technical documentation		www.claris.com/­resources/­documentation	cloud.google.com/­bigtable/­docs
Developer	Atos Convergence Creators	Claris a subsidiary of Apple	Google	Transwarp
Initial release	2016	1983	2015
Current release	1703	19.4.1, November 2021
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	commercial	commercial	commercial
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	yes	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Java
Server operating systems	Linux	iOS client part only Linux OS X Windows	hosted
Data scheme	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	yes	schema-free
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	optional	yes	no
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	yes	yes A http query request can return the data in XML format	no
Secondary indexes	yes	yes	no
SQL Support of SQL	no	yes via plugins	no	SQL-like query language
APIs and other access methods	LDAP	Filemaker WebDirect JDBC ODBC	gRPC (using protocol buffers) API HappyBase (Python library) HBase compatible API (Java)	OpenCypher
Supported programming languages	All languages with LDAP bindings	PHP	C# C++ Go Java JavaScript (Node.js) Python
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	yes	no
Triggers	yes	yes	no
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding cell division	none	Sharding	horizontal partitioning
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	yes	Source-replica replication, warm standby since Version 14	Internal replication in Colossus, and regional replication between two clusters in different zones
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods		no	yes
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration		Immediate consistency (for a single cluster), Eventual consistency (for two or more replicated clusters)
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	yes	no
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	Atomic execution of specific operations	no	Atomic single-row operations
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes	yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes	yes	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes		no
User concepts Access control	LDAP bind authentication	simple rights management via user accounts and connection to external directory services	Access rights for users, groups and roles based on Google Cloud Identity and Access Management (IAM)	yes
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Atos Standard Common Repository	FileMaker	Google Cloud Bigtable	Transwarp StellarDB
Recent citations in the news		Tilda Swinton Wasn't Prepared for 'Problemista' Horror Stories from Audiences Who Recognize Her Toxic Art World ... 14 June 2024, Yahoo Movies UK Reviews - Features 1 March 2024, Reverse Shot New customizable ERP platform based on Claris FileMaker released 11 June 2024, openPR Apple kills Claris, saves FileMaker 3 June 2024, ITPro Today Tilda Swinton on 'Problemista' Fan Horror Stories About Her Character 1 March 2024, IndieWire provided by Google News	Google Introduces Autoscaling for Cloud Bigtable for Optimizing Costs 31 January 2022, InfoQ.com Google scales up Cloud Bigtable NoSQL database 27 January 2022, TechTarget Review: Google Bigtable scales with ease 7 September 2016, InfoWorld Google Cloud makes it cheaper to run smaller workloads on Bigtable 7 April 2020, TechCrunch Google introduces Cloud Bigtable managed NoSQL database to process data at scale 6 May 2015, VentureBeat provided by Google News

Share this page