DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Databricks vs. Drizzle vs. STSdb

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Databricks vs. Drizzle vs. STSdb

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.

Drizzle has published its last release in September 2012. The open-source project is discontinued and Drizzle is excluded from the DB-Engines ranking.

Description

Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks

The Databricks Lakehouse Platform combines elements of data lakes and data warehouses to provide a unified view onto structured and unstructured data. It is based on Apache Spark.

MySQL fork with a pluggable micro-kernel and with an emphasis of performance over compatibility.

Key-Value Store with special method for indexing

optimized for high performance using a special indexing method

Primary database model

Document store
Key-value store

Document store
Relational DBMS

Relational DBMS

Key-value store

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	78.61
Rank	#15	Overall
	#2	Document stores
	#10	Relational DBMS

Score	0.04
Rank	#360	Overall
	#52	Key-value stores

Website

atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository

www.databricks.com

github.com/STSSoft/STSdb4

Technical documentation

docs.databricks.com

Developer

Atos Convergence Creators

Databricks

Drizzle project, originally started by Brian Aker

STS Soft SC

Initial release

2016

2013

2008

2011

Current release

1703

7.2.4, September 2012

4.0.8, September 2015

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

Open Source

GNU GPL

Open Source

GPLv2, commercial license available

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

yes

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Java

C++

Server operating systems

Linux

hosted

FreeBSD
Linux
OS X

Windows

Data scheme

Schema and schema-less with LDAP views

Flexible Schema (defined schema, partial schema, schema free)

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

optional

yes

primitive types and user defined types (classes)

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

with Databricks SQL

yes

with proprietary extensions

APIs and other access methods

LDAP

JDBC
ODBC
RESTful HTTP API

JDBC

.NET Client API

Supported programming languages

All languages with LDAP bindings

Python
R
Scala

C
C++
Java
PHP

C#
Java

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

user defined functions and aggregates

Triggers

yes

hooks for callbacks inside the server can be used.

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Sharding

cell division

Sharding

none

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

yes

Multi-source replication
Source-replica replication

none

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

Atomic execution of specific operations

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

LDAP bind authentication

Pluggable authentication mechanisms

e.g. LDAP, HTTP

More information provided by the system vendor

Specific characteristics

Supported database models : In addition to the Document store and Relational DBMS...
» more

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

DB-Engines blog posts

PostgreSQL is the DBMS of the Year 2023
2 January 2024, Matthias Gelbmann, Paul Andlinger

show all

MySQL won the April ranking; did its forks follow?
1 April 2015, Paul Andlinger

Has MySQL finally lost its mojo?
1 July 2013, Matthias Gelbmann

show all

Recent citations in the news

Infographic: What makes a Mobile Operator's setup future proof?
10 February 2024, Atos

provided by Google News

What to expect during the Databricks Data + AI Summit
30 May 2024, SiliconANGLE News

Databricks Co-founder on the Next AI Frontier
30 May 2024, Bloomberg

ROI Training Announces Partnership With Databricks as Authorized Training Partner
29 May 2024, AccessWire

Databricks is expanding the scope of its AI investments with second VC fund
21 May 2024, Fortune

AI is Driving Record Sales at Multibillion-Dollar Databricks. An IPO Can Wait … - WSJ
6 March 2024, The Wall Street Journal

provided by Google News

Share this page