DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Citus vs. OrigoDB vs. Transwarp KunDB

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Citus vs. OrigoDB vs. Transwarp KunDB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	Citus  Xexclude from comparison	OrigoDB  Xexclude from comparison	Transwarp KunDB  Xexclude from comparison
	This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.
Description	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	Scalable hybrid operational and analytics RDBMS for big data use cases based on PostgreSQL	A fully ACID in-memory object graph database	OLTP DBMS based on a distributed architecture and highly compatible with MySQL and Oracle
Primary database model	Document store Key-value store	Relational DBMS	Document store Object oriented DBMS	Relational DBMS
Secondary database models		Document store
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart		Score 2.15 Rank #117   Overall #56   Relational DBMS	Score 0.06 Rank #380   Overall #50   Document stores #18   Object oriented DBMS	Score 0.14 Rank #341   Overall #149   Relational DBMS
Website	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	www.citusdata.com	origodb.com	www.transwarp.cn/­en/­product/­kundb
Technical documentation		docs.citusdata.com	origodb.com/­docs
Developer	Atos Convergence Creators		Robert Friberg et al	Transwarp
Initial release	2016	2010	2009 under the name LiveDB
Current release	1703	8.1, December 2018
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	Open Source AGPL, commercial license also available	Open Source	commercial
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Java	C	C#
Server operating systems	Linux	Linux	Linux Windows
Data scheme	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	yes	yes	yes
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	optional	yes	User defined using .NET types and collections	yes
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	yes	yes specific XML type available, but no XML query functionality	no can be achieved using .NET
Secondary indexes	yes	yes	yes	yes
SQL Support of SQL	no	yes standard, with numerous extensions	no	yes
APIs and other access methods	LDAP	ADO.NET JDBC native C library ODBC streaming API for large objects	.NET Client API HTTP API LINQ
Supported programming languages	All languages with LDAP bindings	.Net C C++ Delphi Java JavaScript (Node.js) Perl PHP Python Tcl	.Net
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	user defined functions realized in proprietary language PL/pgSQL or with common languages like Perl, Python, Tcl etc.	yes	yes
Triggers	yes	yes	yes Domain Events	yes
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding cell division	Sharding	horizontal partitioning client side managed; servers are not synchronized	horizontal partitioning
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	yes	Source-replica replication other methods possible by using 3rd party extensions	Source-replica replication
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods		no	no	no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration	Immediate Consistency		Immediate Consistency
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	yes	depending on model	yes
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	Atomic execution of specific operations	ACID	ACID	ACID
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes	yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes	yes Write ahead log	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes	no	yes
User concepts Access control	LDAP bind authentication	fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard	Role based authorization	yes
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Atos Standard Common Repository	Citus	OrigoDB	Transwarp KunDB
Recent citations in the news	Infographic: What makes a Mobile Operator's setup future proof? 10 February 2024, Atos provided by Google News	Ubicloud wants to build an open source alternative to AWS 5 March 2024, TechCrunch Ubicloud reels in $16M for its open-source cloud platform 5 March 2024, SiliconANGLE News Microsoft acquires Citus Data, re-affirming its commitment to Open Source and accelerating Azure PostgreSQL ... 24 January 2019, Microsoft Distributed PostgreSQL Benchmarks: Azure Cosmos DB, CockroachDB, and YugabyteDB 8 July 2023, InfoQ.com Microsoft Benchmarks Distributed PostgreSQL DBs 10 July 2023, Datanami provided by Google News

Share this page