DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Cachelot.io vs. Infobright vs. Splice Machine

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Cachelot.io vs. Infobright vs. Splice Machine

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	Cachelot.io  Xexclude from comparison	Infobright  Xexclude from comparison	Splice Machine  Xexclude from comparison
	This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.
Description	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	In-memory caching system	High performant column-oriented DBMS for analytic workloads using MySQL or PostgreSQL as a frontend	Open-Source SQL RDBMS for Operational and Analytical use cases with native Machine Learning, powered by Hadoop and Spark
Primary database model	Document store Key-value store	Key-value store	Relational DBMS	Relational DBMS
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart		Score 0.04 Rank #388   Overall #62   Key-value stores	Score 1.02 Rank #192   Overall #90   Relational DBMS	Score 0.54 Rank #252   Overall #115   Relational DBMS
Website	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	cachelot.io	ignitetech.com/­softwarelibrary/­infobrightdb	splicemachine.com
Technical documentation				splicemachine.com/­how-it-works
Developer	Atos Convergence Creators		Ignite Technologies Inc.; formerly InfoBright Inc.	Splice Machine
Initial release	2016	2015	2005	2014
Current release	1703			3.1, March 2021
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	Open Source Simplified BSD License	commercial The open source (GPLv2) version did not support inserts/updates/deletes and was discontinued with July 2016	Open Source AGPL 3.0, commercial license available
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Java	C++	C	Java
Server operating systems	Linux	FreeBSD Linux OS X	Linux Windows	Linux OS X Solaris Windows
Data scheme	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	schema-free	yes	yes
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	optional	no	yes	yes
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	yes	no	no
Secondary indexes	yes	no	no Knowledge Grid Technology used instead	yes
SQL Support of SQL	no	no	yes	yes
APIs and other access methods	LDAP	Memcached protocol	ADO.NET JDBC ODBC	JDBC Native Spark Datasource ODBC
Supported programming languages	All languages with LDAP bindings	.Net C C++ ColdFusion Erlang Java Lisp Lua OCaml OCaml Perl PHP Python Ruby	.Net C C# C++ D Eiffel Erlang Haskell Java Objective-C OCaml Perl PHP Python Ruby Scheme Tcl	C# C++ Java JavaScript (Node.js) Python R Scala
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	no	no	yes Java
Triggers	yes	no	no	yes
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding cell division	none	none	Shared Nothhing Auto-Sharding, Columnar Partitioning
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	yes	none	Source-replica replication	Multi-source replication Source-replica replication
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods		no	no	Yes, via Full Spark Integration
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration	none	Immediate Consistency	Immediate Consistency
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	no	no	yes
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	Atomic execution of specific operations	no	ACID	ACID
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes	yes	yes, multi-version concurrency control (MVCC)
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	no	yes	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes	no	yes	yes
User concepts Access control	LDAP bind authentication	no	fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard exploiting MySQL or PostgreSQL frontend capabilities	Access rights for users, groups and roles according to SQL-standard
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Atos Standard Common Repository	Cachelot.io	Infobright	Splice Machine
Recent citations in the news				Machine learning data pipeline outfit Splice Machine files for insolvency 26 August 2021, The Register Splice Machine Launches Feature Store to Simplify Feature Engineering 19 January 2021, Datanami New Splice Machine RDBMS unites OLTP and OLAP 18 November 2015, CIO Big Data News: Splice Machine, Carpathia, Altiscale, DataGravity 11 February 2014, Data Center Knowledge How To Axe Db2 But Keep Your Code 10 March 2020, Towards Data Science provided by Google News

Share this page