DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. atoti vs. Brytlyt vs. NSDb vs. OpenEdge

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. atoti vs. Brytlyt vs. NSDb vs. OpenEdge

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.

Description

Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks

An in-memory DBMS combining transactional and analytical processing to handle the aggregation of ever-changing data.

Scalable GPU-accelerated RDBMS for very fast analytic and streaming workloads, leveraging PostgreSQL

Scalable, High-performance Time Series DBMS designed for Real-time Analytics on top of Kubernetes

Application development environment with integrated database management system

Primary database model

Document store
Key-value store

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.43
Rank	#256	Overall
	#12	Object oriented DBMS

Score	0.25
Rank	#294	Overall
	#133	Relational DBMS

Score	0.00
Rank	#386	Overall
	#41	Time Series DBMS

Score	3.56
Rank	#78	Overall
	#42	Relational DBMS

Website

atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository

atoti.io

brytlyt.io

nsdb.io

www.progress.com/openedge

Technical documentation

docs.atoti.io

docs.brytlyt.io

nsdb.io/Architecture

documentation.progress.com/output/ua/OpenEdge_latest

Developer

Atos Convergence Creators

ActiveViam

Brytlyt

Progress Software Corporation

Initial release

2016

2017

1984

Current release

1703

5.0, August 2023

OpenEdge 12.2, March 2020

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

free versions available

commercial

Open Source

Apache Version 2.0

commercial

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Java

C, C++ and CUDA

Java, Scala

Server operating systems

Linux

Linux
OS X
Windows

Linux
macOS

AIX
HP-UX
Linux
Solaris
Windows

Data scheme

Schema and schema-less with LDAP views

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

optional

yes

yes: int, bigint, decimal, string

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

specific XML-type available, but no XML query functionality.

yes

Secondary indexes

yes

all fields are automatically indexed

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

Multidimensional Expressions (MDX)

yes

SQL-like query language

yes

close to SQL 92

APIs and other access methods

LDAP

ADO.NET
JDBC
native C library
ODBC
streaming API for large objects

gRPC
HTTP REST
WebSocket

JDBC
ODBC

Supported programming languages

All languages with LDAP bindings

.Net
C
C++
Delphi
Java
Perl
Python
Tcl

Java
Scala

Progress proprietary ABL (Advanced Business Language)

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

Python

user defined functions

in PL/pgSQL

yes

Triggers

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Sharding

cell division

Sharding, horizontal partitioning

Sharding

horizontal partitioning

since Version 11.4

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

yes

Source-replica replication

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration

Immediate Consistency

Eventual Consistency

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

Atomic execution of specific operations

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

yes, multi-version concurrency control (MVCC)

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

Using Apache Lucene

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

LDAP bind authentication

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

Users and groups

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

Overview Of Atoti: A Python BI Analytics Tool
14 May 2021, AIM

ActiveViam Announces Leadership Succession
4 September 2024, Business Wire

provided by Google News

Bringing GPUs To Bear On Bog Standard Relational Databases
26 February 2018, The Next Platform

Brytlyt secures another $5M to bring big data and AI within the reach of any business
22 December 2021, Tech Funding News

About Charlie McIver
27 October 2022, Fintech Finance

provided by Google News

What's New in OpenEdge 12.8
15 April 2024, release.nl

4 sources of latency and how to avoid them
1 November 2017, InfoWorld

provided by Google News

Share this page