DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. BigObject vs. Blueflood vs. Quasardb

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. BigObject vs. Blueflood vs. Quasardb

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	BigObject  Xexclude from comparison	Blueflood  Xexclude from comparison	Quasardb  Xexclude from comparison
	This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.
Description	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	Analytic DBMS for real-time computations and queries	Scalable TimeSeries DBMS based on Cassandra	Distributed, high-performance timeseries database
Primary database model	Document store Key-value store	Relational DBMS a hierachical model (tree) can be imposed	Time Series DBMS	Time Series DBMS
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart		Score 0.19 Rank #329   Overall #146   Relational DBMS	Score 0.13 Rank #346   Overall #33   Time Series DBMS	Score 0.21 Rank #322   Overall #29   Time Series DBMS
Website	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	bigobject.io	blueflood.io	quasar.ai
Technical documentation		docs.bigobject.io	github.com/­rax-maas/­blueflood/­wiki	doc.quasar.ai/­master
Developer	Atos Convergence Creators	BigObject, Inc.	Rackspace	quasardb
Initial release	2016	2015	2013	2009
Current release	1703			3.14.1, January 2024
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	commercial free community edition available	Open Source Apache 2.0	commercial Free community edition, Non-profit organizations and non-commercial usage are eligible for free licenses
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Java		Java	C++
Server operating systems	Linux	Linux distributed as a docker-image OS X distributed as a docker-image (boot2docker) Windows distributed as a docker-image (boot2docker)	Linux OS X	BSD Linux OS X Windows
Data scheme	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	yes	predefined scheme	schema-free
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	optional	yes	yes	yes integer and binary
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	yes	no	no	no
Secondary indexes	yes	yes	no	yes with tags
SQL Support of SQL	no	SQL-like DML and DDL statements	no	SQL-like query language
APIs and other access methods	LDAP	fluentd ODBC RESTful HTTP API	HTTP REST	HTTP API
Supported programming languages	All languages with LDAP bindings			.Net C C# C++ Go Java JavaScript (Node.js) PHP Python R
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	Lua	no	no
Triggers	yes	no	no	no
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding cell division	none	Sharding based on Cassandra	Sharding consistent hashing
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	yes	none	selectable replication factor based on Cassandra	Source-replica replication with selectable replication factor
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods		no	no	with Hadoop integration
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration	none	Eventual Consistency based on Cassandra Immediate Consistency based on Cassandra	Immediate Consistency
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	yes automatically between fact table and dimension tables	no	no
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	Atomic execution of specific operations	no	no	ACID
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes Read/write lock on objects (tables, trees)	yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes	yes	yes by using LevelDB
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes	yes	no	yes Transient mode
User concepts Access control	LDAP bind authentication	no	no	Cryptographically strong user authentication and audit trail
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Atos Standard Common Repository	BigObject	Blueflood	Quasardb
Recent citations in the news	Infographic: What makes a Mobile Operator's setup future proof? 10 February 2024, Atos provided by Google News		Real-Time Performance and Health Monitoring Using Netdata 2 September 2019, CNX Software provided by Google News	Record quasar is most luminous object in the universe 20 February 2024, EarthSky Quasar Partners with PTC to Empower IoT Customers with High-Performance Data Solutions 11 September 2023, Datanami QUASAR yacht (Bilgin, 46.8m, 2016) 3 July 2023, Boat International Gas on the run – ALMA spots the shadow of a molecular outflow from a quasar when the Universe was less than one ... 2 February 2024, waseda.jp Quasar Selected by National Renewable Energy Laboratory to Help with Energy System De-risking and Optimization 6 June 2023, PR Newswire provided by Google News

Share this page