DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. BaseX vs. Cachelot.io vs. Postgres-XL

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. BaseX vs. Cachelot.io vs. Postgres-XL

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	BaseX  Xexclude from comparison	Cachelot.io  Xexclude from comparison	Postgres-XL  Xexclude from comparison
	This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.
Description	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	Light-weight Native XML DBMS with support for XQuery 3.0 and interactive GUI.	In-memory caching system	Based on PostgreSQL enhanced with MPP and write-scale-out cluster features
Primary database model	Document store Key-value store	Native XML DBMS	Key-value store	Relational DBMS
Secondary database models				Document store Spatial DBMS
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart		Score 1.84 Rank #135   Overall #4   Native XML DBMS	Score 0.04 Rank #388   Overall #62   Key-value stores	Score 0.53 Rank #254   Overall #117   Relational DBMS
Website	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	basex.org	cachelot.io	www.postgres-xl.org
Technical documentation		docs.basex.org		www.postgres-xl.org/­documentation
Developer	Atos Convergence Creators	BaseX GmbH
Initial release	2016	2007	2015	2014 since 2012, originally named StormDB
Current release	1703	11.0, June 2024		10 R1, October 2018
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	Open Source BSD license	Open Source Simplified BSD License	Open Source Mozilla public license
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Java	Java	C++	C
Server operating systems	Linux	Linux OS X Windows	FreeBSD Linux OS X	Linux macOS
Data scheme	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	schema-free	schema-free	yes
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	optional	no XQuery supports types	no	yes
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	yes		no	yes XML type, but no XML query functionality
Secondary indexes	yes	yes	no	yes
SQL Support of SQL	no	no	no	yes distributed, parallel query execution
APIs and other access methods	LDAP	Java API RESTful HTTP API RESTXQ WebDAV XML:DB XQJ	Memcached protocol	ADO.NET JDBC native C library ODBC streaming API for large objects
Supported programming languages	All languages with LDAP bindings	Actionscript C C# Haskell Java JavaScript Node.js Lisp Perl PHP Python Qt Rebol Ruby Scala Visual Basic	.Net C C++ ColdFusion Erlang Java Lisp Lua OCaml OCaml Perl PHP Python Ruby	.Net C C++ Delphi Erlang Java JavaScript (Node.js) Perl PHP Python Tcl
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	yes	no	user defined functions
Triggers	yes	yes via events	no	yes
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding cell division	none	none	horizontal partitioning
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	yes	none	none
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods		no	no	no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration		none	Immediate Consistency
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	no	no	yes
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	Atomic execution of specific operations	multiple readers, single writer	no	ACID MVCC
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes	yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes	no	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes		no	no
User concepts Access control	LDAP bind authentication	Users with fine-grained authorization concept on 4 levels	no	fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Atos Standard Common Repository	BaseX	Cachelot.io	Postgres-XL
Recent citations in the news		XML Injection Attacks: What to Know About XPath, XQuery, XXE & More 18 May 2022, Hashed Out by The SSL Store™ 9 Skills You Need to Become a Data Engineer 2 November 2022, KDnuggets Xml Databases Software Market Thriving at a Tremendous Growth – TIMC 16 June 2024, TIMC provided by Google News

Share this page